On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, at 06:00, Salz, Rich wrote: > > I think the draft would be ok to adopt if we don't finish > it until the outcome from the NIST competition is known. > Otherwise I would be against adoption. > > I think I agree with this, but am not sure. Can we have this on the > agenda for Vancouver?
That's a good idea. Because I'm fairly sure that I disagree. This work might form the basis of experiments. If the competition result is known, we might instead want to start the process of defining key exchange with a single algorithm rather than concern ourselves with compositions. Having the document in place so that we can define experiments with a degree of surety with respect to their risks is best. In any case, we should adopt this work. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
