Re: [TLS] ECH is an abomination

2021-12-06 Thread Tony Rutkowski
Although you may not agree with the assertions and choose to ignore the comments, they are in fact professional and highly relevant even if there is indirect reference to individuals. BigTechAntitrust also raises a substantial antitrust issue which is being ignored.  TruePosition v Ericsson sug

Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenges with TLS 1.3

2021-09-30 Thread Tony Rutkowski
Ruslan, Speaking as as a lawyer has participated in many EU proceedings over several decades, your assertion here is not accurate.  A European Council Resolution is by definition a "legal document." It was adopted on 14 Dec 2020 after an extensive policy making proceeding and consultations am

Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenges with TLS 1.3

2021-09-30 Thread Tony Rutkowski
e protocol then which does not put such claim. Regards, Ruslan Am Mittwoch, dem 29.09.2021 um 18:21 -0400 schrieb Tony Rutkowski: Hiya, Assuming you live in the EU, your assertion is not accurate.  In November of last year, the European Council adopted a EU wide Re

Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenges with TLS 1.3

2021-09-29 Thread Tony Rutkowski
Hiya, Assuming you live in the EU, your assertion is not accurate.  In November of last year, the European Council adopted a EU wide Resolution on Encryption.  See at https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13084-2020-REV-1/en/pdf Clause 6 establishes a regulatory framework, and claus

Re: [TLS] 3GPP forbids support of MD5, SHA-1, non-AEAD, and non-PFS in TLS

2020-03-08 Thread Tony Rutkowski
x27;t want to be cautious, then lawyer up...or at least get ISOC to buy you more insurance. :-) Oh, is it clear who is covered by the insurance? cheers, tony On 2020-03-08 12:59 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: On 08/03/2020 16:35, Tony Rutkowski wrote: Stephen, It is not false. We disagree.

Re: [TLS] 3GPP forbids support of MD5, SHA-1, non-AEAD, and non-PFS in TLS

2020-03-08 Thread Tony Rutkowski
work was recognized by those there. Whit was also there also there and gave a great presentation. Unfortunately, women in this field seem not to get the credit they deserve. --tony On 2020-03-08 10:56 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: On 08/03/2020 14:46, Tony Rutkowski wrote: TLS is particular

Re: [TLS] 3GPP forbids support of MD5, SHA-1, non-AEAD, and non-PFS in TLS

2020-03-08 Thread Tony Rutkowski
Hi John, There are several orders associated with the settlement agreement - which is relevant here.  You need a PACER account to access the docket.  It was a complicated case that stretched over several years and cost ETSI a considerable amount of money - and involved several companies.  Tru

Re: [TLS] 3GPP forbids support of MD5, SHA-1, non-AEAD, and non-PFS in TLS

2020-03-07 Thread Tony Rutkowski
One comment.  Perhaps some caution might be advised in light of the antitrust court order in /Trueposition v. Ericsson/. Ref. Order in Case No. 2:11-cv-4574, (U.S. E.D. Pa, 14 Jul 2014). --amr On 2020-03-06 7:02 PM, John Mattsson wrote: Hi, I am happy to report that 3GPP just took the decisi

Re: [TLS] 3GPP forbids support of MD5, SHA-1, non-AEAD, and non-PFS in TLS

2020-03-07 Thread Tony Rutkowski
One comment.  Perhaps some caution might be advised in light of the antitrust court order in /Trueposition v. Ericsson/. Ref. Order in Case No. 2:11-cv-4574, (U.S. E.D. Pa, 14 Jul 2014). --amr On 2020-03-06 7:02 PM, John Mattsson wrote: Hi, I am happy to report that 3GPP just took the decisi