Hello Thomas,
The suggested changes would be enough to clear my DISCUSS (even if I do not
agree completely with Achim and you ;-) ).
Regards,
-éric
From: Thomas Fossati
Date: Monday, 7 July 2025 at 09:40
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-tls-dtls-...@ietf.org
, tls-cha
received is preferred or has not changed/
* add somewhere in this section an explanation why the initiator may see a
change of address/port while the responder does not see any change
Hope this helps
Regards,
-éric
From: Thomas Fossati
Date: Thursday, 3 July 2025 at 17:50
To: Eric Vyncke
clear in the text.
Regards
-éric
From: Thomas Fossati
Date: Thursday, 3 July 2025 at 19:54
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-tls-dtls-...@ietf.org
, tls-cha...@ietf.org ,
tls@ietf.org , s...@sn3rd.com
Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-18:
Thank you Nick for your reply and for the changes.
Hope that this helped to improve the document,
Regards
-éric
From: Nick Sullivan
Date: Tuesday, 14 June 2022 at 12:47
To: Eric Vyncke
Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf-tls-subce...@ietf.org"
, tls-chairs ,
"" , Joseph Salowey , Sean Turner
Subj
Martin,
The IETF Last Call on this document has completed on the 20th of April 2021 but
it is never too late of course.
I just added our security Area Directors in the loop so that know your question
for their ballot due for next week.
Regards
-éric
-Original Message-
From: dns-pr
Thank Thomas for your reply.
Re-reading the end of the section 6 gives indeed some insights on the overall
process, which I failed to understand at first reading. May I suggest to
complement the last bullet as " defined in this specification but relies on the
application using DTLS" ?
Hope thi
Sean,
Thank you for your reply. I am of course happy with them ;-)
Regards
-éric
-Original Message-
From: Sean Turner
Date: Friday, 29 January 2021 at 16:54
To: Eric Vyncke
Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf-tls-ticketreque...@ietf.org"
, TLS Chairs , TLS
List
Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's N
