[TLS] Re: Second WG Adoption Call for Use of SLH-DSA in TLS 1.3

+1 to adopting this draft with the addition of the applicability statement to clarify the use case. Andrew -Original Message- From: Sean Turner Sent: 15 July 2025 00:06 To: TLS List Subject: [TLS] Second WG Adoption Call for Use of SLH-DSA in TLS 1.3 We kicked off an adoption cal

[TLS] Re: Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 16:46 Watson Ladd mailto:watsonbl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > How on earth would providing another incompatible set of suggestions help? No > matter what text was in there it would still raise the question of what > people should be doing. Hi Watson You may of course no

[TLS] Re: Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support

On 22/11/2024, 13:37, Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com wrote: > My point was much broader though: the IETF is sending deployers a bunch > of mixed messages, and this is on us as a community. > > RFC 9325 basically tells them: we prefer that you switch to TLS 1.3, b

[TLS] Re: Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support

+1, especially given the previous discussion on this topic on the list back in 2016. Andrew -Original Message- From: Salz, Rich Sent: 05 November 2024 19:01 To: Sean Turner ; TLS List Subject: [TLS] Re: Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support I strongly support adopt

[TLS] Re: [DNSOP] Re: Re: Re: Re: AD review draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech

If appropriate, we could pick up this issue in our ECH Deployment Considerations draft. Happy to discuss in Dublin if there is interest in adding to our existing text. Andrew On 4 Oct 2024, at 19:39, Salz, Rich wrote:  * I would not be in favor of this. This is been intensely controver

Re: [TLS] Late holiday gifts

Any further news on this? I thought the wglc was expected very shortly after 118 and suddenly we're pretty close to 119. GitHub has been pretty quiet too, with no movement on the four open issues since mid-November? Is it just general workload or is something else affecting progress? Andrew

Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:20 BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A mailto:db3...@att.com>> wrote: > As Stephen said, couldn?t resist, first cup of coffee- > > That?s always the question of the day- what is an operator, vendor, > researcher? > > I know ?academia? on this list that have more operational experience than