Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review. Some initial responses are inline.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 5:22 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Thanks for putting together the -06 based on my preliminary comments, and
> my apologies for taking so long to get back to it. It turns out that going
> through the 80-od
If we wanted to go further, defining a new flag that says ‘use “main” as the
prefix’ in the ClientHello?
I agree that text indicating the interop requrements of master is useful. And
then don’t obscure it.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 06:51:48AM +, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> David Fifield writes:
>
> >Peter is surely referring to the influential "The Parrot is Dead" paper from
> >2013
>
> Yep, that was it, thanks (at least one person catalogues their reading by the
> looks of it :-). Thanks for the re
Hi Ekr, this is great! I just wanted to suggest that, instead of obscuring
the word "master", we add a (foot)note to the text explaining its
persistence in the spec and give some historical context.
Best,
Chris P.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:11 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just po
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:52 PM Peter Gutmann
wrote:
> ... in reference to a question someone else asked about ECH and TLS
> 1.3, since it's not defending against anything the censors are doing I
> can't
> see what its presence or absence would do. Something like ECH seems like
> classic inside
