Hi Ekr, this is great! I just wanted to suggest that, instead of obscuring the word "master", we add a (foot)note to the text explaining its persistence in the spec and give some historical context.
Best, Chris P. On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:11 AM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've just posted draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00. > > This document does two things: > > 1. It rolls up all the various errata that have been filed for > RFC 8446. Some of these have created some reader confusion > and so hopefully this will help. > > 2. It renames the "master" secrets to "main" secrets in service > of more inclusive language [0] > > > My intention here is not to make technical changes but just to produce > a document that's easier to work with. If there are other pieces of > text that you think need to be fixed, now would be a good time to flag > them. I am working on this document at > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec > > Thanks to David Benjamin for suggesting this and talking over the > mechanics. > > -Ekr > > [0] Note that I was not totally unable to remove "master" because the > key schedule labels include it. However, I have removed it from the > text and I think we should probably change the labels to hex to > obscure it. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
