[TLS] Minutes for TLS IETF 102 uploaded

2018-07-28 Thread Christopher Wood
Minutes for both TLS sessions at IETF 102 have been uploaded: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-102-tls/ Many thanks to Joe Hall and Gurshabad Grover for taking detailed notes. Please review the minutes and check for inaccuracies. If anything is incorrect, please let the chairs know ASAP.

Re: [TLS] TLS DANE chain, detailed response to concerns raised in the room on Monday

2018-07-28 Thread Paul Hoffman
(Reviving this thread to help the WG move forward on getting this document published) On 18 Jul 2018, at 5:41, Shumon Huque wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:55 AM Eric Rescorla wrote: To the extent to which this is true, it's an argument that one should be pinning at a different layer.

Re: [TLS] Double-Checking after TLS 1.3 pre-RFC copy edits

2018-07-28 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 12:48 AM, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 04:20:43PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Dear TLS WG members. > > > > I am doing my final copy-edits for the TLS 1.3 RFC and I noted one > > technical point and two points I would like to edit for clarity but I >

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-rescorla-tls-esni

2018-07-28 Thread Tim Wicinski
I support adoption of this draft, but as a consumer of SSL certificates which have *17* wildcards on one certificate, I feel that the handling of wildcard DNS records in this draft needs some more thought. Tim On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:22 PM, Victor Vasiliev < vasilvv=40google@dmarc.ietf.or

Re: [TLS] Double-Checking after TLS 1.3 pre-RFC copy edits

2018-07-28 Thread Ilari Liusvaara
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 04:20:43PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Dear TLS WG members. > > I am doing my final copy-edits for the TLS 1.3 RFC and I noted one > technical point and two points I would like to edit for clarity but I > wanted more eyes on. > > 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf