On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 21:49 +, John Harding wrote:
> Would it be possible/worthwhile to maintain the Bronze award as a
> non-accreditated cert as a stepping stone for the Silver (and higher)
> awards for those that need it? Otherwise there would surely be little
> point if the Bronze is never
On 10/14/07, Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 20:09 +, John Harding wrote:
> > Having skimmed through at that document, I can see little overlap.
> > This is almost a gentle introduction to non-computer literate or
> > technophobes to basic computer-based operation
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 20:09 +, John Harding wrote:
> Having skimmed through at that document, I can see little overlap.
> This is almost a gentle introduction to non-computer literate or
> technophobes to basic computer-based operations - from office suites
> to using a GUI and even talks of pa
Richard Rothwell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've tried to make a very simple summary of where we are at:
>
> http://www.thepilots.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.PostSurveyOverview
>
> Can we move to this page to construct something coherent? I'm hoping I've
> not
> missed anything major. For now if we
Would it not be possible to have the Bronze award as "I understand basic IT
administration concepts" - Networking, Whats in a Computer? Basic OS
architecture, How to list running processes? How to install an OS (or run a
Live distro)? etc
This can be skipped by those who have this knowledge either
Having skimmed through at that document, I can see little overlap. This is
almost a gentle introduction to non-computer literate or technophobes to
basic computer-based operations - from office suites to using a GUI and even
talks of password security (someone should tell my users because they won´
Richard,
Just as a thought could we not have a section called "Virtualisation and
thin clients" and include virtualisation and LTSP as they are both important
technologies and would compliment each other very well.
On 10/14/07, Richard Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 14 October
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:04 +0100, Richard Rothwell wrote:
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 14:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I think most things are covered on the web site, but Ian's suggestions
> > make sense in terms of tying it in with school's overall requirements
> > for CPD (using existing ent
On Sunday 14 October 2007 14:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think most things are covered on the web site, but Ian's suggestions
> make sense in terms of tying it in with school's overall requirements
> for CPD (using existing entry level, levels 1-3 etc).
what do you think about raising each o
I think most things are covered on the web site, but Ian's suggestions
make sense in terms of tying it in with school's overall requirements
for CPD (using existing entry level, levels 1-3 etc). One thing that
seems to be missing is applications, i.e. how and what to run on the
servers in
On Sunday 14 October 2007 12:01, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 11:30 +0100, Richard Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've tried to make a very simple summary of where we are at:
> >
> > http://www.thepilots.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.PostSurveyOverview
> >
> > Can we move to this pa
Hi All,
I've tried to make a very simple summary of where we are at:
http://www.thepilots.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.PostSurveyOverview
Can we move to this page to construct something coherent? I'm hoping I've not
missed anything major. For now if we can restrict is to one or two points
pe
On Sunday 14 October 2007 02:02, Kris Douglas wrote:
> On 14/10/2007, John Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There seems to be little reference to virtualisation as a whole (VMWare
> > is mentionned as an item on a topic after the survey) but the use of
> > virtual servers is just exploding -
13 matches
Mail list logo
