Hi Tom,
* ec
Reason: Red Hat Legal says the license is non-free, primarily because of
the requirement that modifications must always be accompanied by
unmodified originals.
I've been talking to rms/brett/bkuhn about this. I know this
second-hand email can't be considered authorit
* free-math-font-survey
Reason: Could not find a license.
I've talked with Stephen (Hartke) several times over the years about the
lack of license. I hope one day he'll be able to update it. Meanwhile,
I've removed it from TL.
(Robin, I guess it should become "noinfo" in the Catalogue.
FYI, regarding these two:
* ec
Reason: Red Hat Legal says the license is non-free, primarily because of
the requirement that modifications must always be accompanied by
unmodified originals.
* midnight
It is non-free, because it forces you to distribute only with the
a
[Discuss] * floatflt
Reason: License is non-free due to explicit clause forbidding modification:
Tom, Jindrich, all -- Robin and I have had no luck finding an
alternative email address for Mats Dahlgren. The obvious one
(matsd at sssk dot se) bounces.
Would anyone else be willing to try
* authoraftertitle
Reason: The only indication of license is "License: Absolutely Free :)",
which, while cute, is not a license.
Agreed. I have removed it from TL.
Robin, please change it to other-nonfree in the Catalogue, if you're
so inclined.
This code is circa 2006 and
Subject: TeX Live 2011 License Audit - Non Free Items [01/02]
Subject: TeX Live 2011 License Audit - Mislabeled Components [02/02]
Thanks much Tom, I/we will review.
karl
___
TeXLive mailing list
TeXLive@linux.cz
http://www.linux.cz/mailman/list
