On 11/27/19 06:29, Kamil Paral wrote:
Sure, no rush. Pat, one more thing, can you please make sure you always
reply to the same email thread instead of starting a new one? Do not change
the subject and use Reply (All) on an existing conversation. Delete all
quoted text that no longer relevant
As promised during yesterday's meeting, I looked at the proposed test case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tablepc/Draft_testcase_reboot
I have multiple comments:
- It is trying to check two things at the same time: 1. that
reboot/shutdown works as expected 2. that filesystems are properl
I've been needing a screen caster for a while. I starting "auditioning"
them and ran into a consistent problem. The folks at Ask Fedora got me
to a good place and provided an explanation as to why the video wasn't
working (link next).
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/need-help-with-screencaster
According to the forum, it sounds like you have it solved now. The
issue is that if you're using Wayland, X applications can't read the
screen. Actually, Wayland apps can't do that directly either. There's
a new system called pipewire that provides that support now and will
eventually take
Kamil,
Sure thing. I was planning to work on it today.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 12/2/19 06:01, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:30 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:10 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
Sounds reasonable to test both LiveOS a
On 12/2/19 07:03, Kamil Paral wrote:
I'm not familiar with kanban/taiga. What is the benefit over using standard
(Pagure) tickets?
The kanban/taiga is what they use at Fedora Magazine. A Writer starts by
creating an Issue proposing a new article for the magazine. There is a
back and for
On 12/2/19 06:01, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:30 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:10 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
Sounds reasonable to test both LiveOS and the installed system. Does it
make sense to test both installed system's reboot and poweroff, though? Are
t
When I saw the kanban/taiga mentioned on the test list today, I thought
about a comment KParal made a while back about that there were some Test
Cases that he knew of that needed some updating. I'm aware of some too.
It seems to me we could use the kanban to keep our test documentation up
to d
On 12/2/19 14:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 14:36 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
When I saw the kanban/taiga mentioned on the test list today, I thought
about a comment KParal made a while back about that there were some Test
Cases that he knew of that needed some
The first send didn't seem to work; so I'm trying again.
On 12/2/19 13:43, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 12/2/19 06:01, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:30 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:10 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
Sounds reasonable to test both
On 12/3/19 06:27, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 7:43 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I have the update ready. I think I interpolated the discussion
correctly, but probably leaned toward the "keep it simple for now" case.
Please let me know if there are further chan
I have just recently become aware of pipewire. If my questions are the
wrong ones please feel free to interpret them in a more correct way. I
am wondering:
Is pipewire part of Wayland?
From what I've seen so far, it seems like pipewire will replace
gstreamer, ffmpeg, pulse audio, and jack. Th
On 12/4/19 20:45, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2019-12-05 04:53, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I have just recently become aware of pipewire. If my questions are the wrong
ones please feel free to interpret them in a more correct way. I am wondering:
Is pipewire part of Wayland?
From what I&#x
On 12/5/19 03:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/4/19 12:53 PM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
Is pipewire part of Wayland?
No. It's just necessary for screen casting with Wayland because you
don't have direct access to the screen buffer now. It provides the
"pipe" between
On 12/5/19 03:56, Kamil Paral wrote:
Here's the email I had in mind, containing the important journal messages:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/S5LQTXKFPIUKBFC7HL5SNSAV3ZRFP6WV/
We need to create a command or commands that will detect any of
On 12/5/19 14:07, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 12/5/19 03:56, Kamil Paral wrote:
Here's the email I had in mind, containing the important journal
messages:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/S5LQTXKFPIUKBFC7HL5SNSAV3ZRFP6WV/
We ne
I'm thinking about a project for myself and I'm curious about some things:
Is there a tool available to automate (relval report-results)? Something
like a template with check boxes and text fields you could fill in as
you test and then do something like (relval post) and Yeah! all the
results
I think I have it close to what you want. Please let me know.
Here's the link:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tablepc/Draft_testcase_reboot
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 12/5/19 14:07, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 12/5/19 03:56, Kamil Paral
On 12/7/19 14:42, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/7/19 6:22 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
My idea is to connect 2 PCs together via USB. One PC would be running
Python pretending to be the keyboard on the test machine. So of course
I need a Python library that provides for keyboard emulation. I
The test case is running on a new install. During the install a user was
set up and that user has Admin. In that situation I've never had
problems running journalcrl, grep, or this journalctl | grep. Perhaps we
should have them login to their user account.
I've not found the need to invoke sud
On 12/12/19 08:28, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 5:14 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
What's the point of running the checks from Live image as well? The local
filesystems will likely get wiped and re-created anyway. Extra failures
in
the log might just confuse us when reading the b
On 12/17/19 09:01, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:17 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
Yes, but we use the keywords from those samples in the grep pattern. So
if
the sample is outdated, the grep pattern is likely outdated as well, and
we
need to update the test case anyway
On 12/17/19 09:01, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:17 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
Yes, but we use the keywords from those samples in the grep pattern. So
if
the sample is outdated, the grep pattern is likely outdated as well, and
we
need to update the test case anyway
Happy New Year Everyone!
In my prior experience I was expected to keep any problem reports I
filed (like bug reports) followed up on and make sure they got closed.
For me it's a long established habit.
I like to keep my bugzilla list short. Sometimes bugs that I have filed
are fixed without
First, Thanks to those who replied. I really appreciate it.
I'd say if you know that they are fixed you should just close them
explaining that. If there's some issue and the maintainer(s) want them
to stay open they can always re-open them.
To me, this seems a little pushy and I wouldn't feel
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_testcase_reboot
Hey Pat, thanks for your edits. I've made some further changes to the same
page (you can see them in history). I think the test case is good to go and
be incorporated into our official test case set (under a more fitting name,
On 1/8/20 7:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! As discussed at the meeting this week, we're sort of missing
a process for people to become QA group sponsors, and an SOP for how
sponsors should handle group membership requests. I've written a draft
for the second piece today:
https://fedora
On 1/9/20 3:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks!
To go with the draft SOP for handling group membership requests, here's
a draft SOP for applying to be a sponsor, and handling those
applications:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_sop_becoming_a_sponsor
again I kept it pret
On 1/9/20 7:21 PM, Adam Williamson
If we do turn out to have problems we can always tighten things up, but
I don't want to build a whole big procedural bureaucracy from the start
if we're not gonna need it...
Sorry, just some of my history showing up. Though my career I have been
a member of
In regard to my testing of F32 Workstation Rawhide drop 0109.n.0:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. After
the he ISO was check summed it was loaded to a thumb drive using Media
Writer. The thumb drive was written successfully and then used to boot
the test machi
I just noticed this so perhaps this is the normal case.
In regard F32 Workstation 0109.n.0 which I ran tests on yesterday and
for the most part everything seemed fine.
When I bring up a terminal window The prompt is "[tablepc@localhost-live
~]" Is th live bit right for a Rawhide version?
This is in regard to machines running Fully updated F31 and getting
Kernel tainted errors and tpm2-abrmd errors on a recurring basis.
My AMD A10 machine has not shown these errors. However, on my intel
machines I have been getting frequent Kernel oops errors in Problem
Reporter where it says
Thanks. I don't know why I never noticed it before.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 1/11/20 11:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2020-01-11 at 10:19 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I just noticed this so perhaps this is the normal case.
In regar
On 1/11/20 2:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 9:00 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
This is in regard to machines running Fully updated F31 and getting
Kernel tainted errors and tpm2-abrmd errors on a recurring basis.
Is this a 5.4 kernel? And does the Computer have Secure
On 1/11/20 4:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 1:26 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
On 1/11/20 2:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 9:00 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
This is in regard to machines running Fully updated F31 and getting
Kernel tainted
On 1/11/20 5:58 PM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 1/11/20 4:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 1:26 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
On 1/11/20 2:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 9:00 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
This is in regard to machines
On 1/13/20 2:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
In regard to the TPM2 issue:
Did you read the bug I cited?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769215
Yes, this bug seems to be the exact problem I have. It doesn't matter if
it's turned on or off.
It's supposed to be fixed now. If you'r
On 1/15/20 1:19 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:05 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
On 1/13/20 2:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
In regard to the TPM2 issue:
Did you read the bug I cited?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769215
Yes, this bug seems to be the
On 1/15/20 3:22 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/15/20 11:58 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I get the fwupd on these machines, but from what I've read the TMP is
a separate chip on these machines and is not programmable. I checked
the Lenovo web site under support and for these models. The
On 1/15/20 4:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/15/20 1:29 PM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 1/15/20 3:22 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/15/20 11:58 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I get the fwupd on these machines, but from what I've read the TMP
is a separate chip on these machines and i
The topic came up in our meeting today that seemed to be a problem with
Japanese jeyboards (kana kanji) working in F32. I think I must have
initially misunderstood the issue. Apparently the observed problem was
that when in the GCC under Region & Language the Japanese keyboard
option "Kana Kanj
On 1/21/20 6:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Indeed you can't really show a graphic of an input method - but in that
case, the 'show layout' button *shouldn't be there at all* for list
entries that are input methods. Don't show a button that can't do
anything sensible. That's
https://gitlab.gno
On 1/31/20 6:35 AM, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200131.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
In regard to my testing of F32
This proposal is for changes to Base test case: "QA:Testcase package
install remove" The existing test case is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_package_install_remove
Though there is a requirement to install packages, there are no commands
provided to accomplish this. Also, t
On 2/4/20 06:20, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 3:48 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
This proposal is for changes to Base test case: "QA:Testcase package
install remove" The existing test case is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_package_install_remo
I have completed a first draft of my proposed revision to the
"QA:Testcase package install remove" Base test case. I got some input
based on my initial e'mail on this. I believe I have addressed those items.
I believe it is an important part of testing if an install happened
properly to see
I believe the purpose of the test case is to have a very generic test case
that works in all environments (not just graphical ones) and applies to all
package managers (notably dnf, packagekit, gnome-software, discover,
dnfdragora, etc -- but not rpm, that is one level below them). It relies on
On 2/7/20 10:31, Kamil Paral wrote:
So we're slowly getting back to the original version of the test case. It
still contains instructions to check that applications start correctly,
which I believe is not the point of the test case.
I can certainly see that
It's missing
verification via rp
On 2/10/20 09:45, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I thought the best way to see if the install went well was to see if the
application would start and close.
I think the major difference is that you keep thinking in terms of
applications
On 2/10/20 09:45, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
That's why I kept asking
whether you'd like to create a test case tailored to GUI installation
workflows (and looking at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop
On 2/14/20 10:08, Kamil Paral wrote:
We do have the test case for Core Applications and the ones for Browser
and Terminal. Software even gets a tryout for updating. Question is: Is
this sufficient?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_workstation_core_applications is
just about a few ap
In the test list at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_32_Branched_20200212.n.1_Desktop
There are 27 rows of things to test on between 1 and five platforms.
Even given that much of the testing is automated. You still need test
engineers to keep that all updated, running, and c
Kamil,
Please accept my apology, I had no desire to cause a problem.
Have a Great Day!
Pat
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
I put some commentary in a wrong thread. and I should not have copied
all in my response to Kamil.
Pat
On 2/18/20 08:27, Alessio wrote:
On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 08:17 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
Kamil,
Please accept my apology, I had no desire to cause a problem.
Excuse me
On 2/21/20 09:03, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 32 Branched 20200221.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
In regard to my testing of Fedora-Workstation-32-x86_64-20200225.n.0
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. After
the ISO was check summed it was loaded to a thumb drive using Media
Writer. The thumb drive was written successfully and then used to boot
the test machi
In regard to my testing of Fedora-Workstation-32-x86_64-20200226.n.0:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. After
the ISO was check summed it was loaded to a thumb drive using Media
Writer. The thumb drive was written successfully and then used to boot
the test mach
This is concerning firewall-applet. I see that firewalld and the
firewall applet are based at https://firewalld.org, but it has been
suggeted that gnome is the problem area for why firewall applet won't
work under gnome but works fine under xfce.
Reference:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On 3/16/20 14:36, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:53 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
So our performance in these cases is likely to be severely affected. This might prevent
any "test this RC in 24 hours" efforts
What do you think about pushing back the whole schedule one week? Or tw
In regard to my testing of F32 Workstation beta drop 0316.n.0:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to delete all a
On 3/23/20 20:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks!
We have a proposed F32 blocker bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809717
1. Run a GNOME-on-Wayland session, and see if the bug happens:
1. a) out-of-the-box
1. b) with display scaling manually enabled if it was not auto-enab
In regard to my testing of F32 Workstation beta drop 0322.n.0:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to delete all a
At last Monday's meeting there was mention of a need to start testing
with NVMe. I volunteered to get some and help with that. Part of my
motivation was the desire to become familiar with it and see if it's
something I might have an application for. NVMe seems to have been
created created mo
On 4/4/20 10:24, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 9:14 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
One thing that seems rather puzzling is that NVMe is offered in three
different connection configurations. PCI-E, USB (with a USB connector),
and SSD via SATA (with an SATA connector. Since
I just finished my testing of 0401 on my bare metal test system. The
results were not reported because the current event is 0404.
Everything looks good except for the bugs I already reported and they
are not blockers.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812510
https://bugzilla.redha
On 4/4/20 15:27, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:45 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I'm not sure the having UEFI is the differentiator... I have a 6th gen I5
computer which boots UEFI fine but predates NVMe. On that one I use a
PCIEx4 adapter and have /boot and /boot/E
In regard to my testing of Workstation-Live RC1.3:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to delete all and reclaim
The approach the current criteria were intended to back was one where
we would have something like rawhide-backgrounds or development-
backgrounds which contained a background image that was very obviously
a WORK IN PROGRESS kind of thing - picture of Beefy with "PRE RELEASE"
written on it, or
On 4/16/20 11:21, Adam Williamson wrote:
If we're gonna write test cases like that, we should probably just have
an alternative template, or an alternative "mode" for the template we
have. I don't like using a template which clearly expects the "Here are
the steps, and here are the expected
It's not about interpretation or not, it's just about a preference for
this:
Test Steps
--
1. Step 1
2. Step 2
3. Step 3
Expected Results
1. Expected result 1
2. Expected result 2
3. Expected result 3
versus this:
Test Steps and Expected Results
--
On 4/16/20 16:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 13:57 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
It's not about interpretation or not, it's just about a preference for
this:
Test Steps
--
1. Step 1
2. Step 2
3. Step 3
Expected Results
1. Expecte
I've seen that SELinux is still not allowing the accounts-daemon access
to sys-nice. I see there is a bug filed on this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811407
There seem to be two lines of thought about a solution. One to change
SELinux granting daemons access and the other see
In regard to my testing of F32 Workstation-Live x86-64 RC1.4:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to delete all a
On 4/21/20 13:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
stardict-dic-en
stardict-dic-ja
These were both retired as they were unmaintained. You can always check
this in dist-git:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stardict-dic-ja
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stardict-dic-en
general
On 4/22/20 16:54, tmsta...@t-mittelstaedt.de wrote:
Am 22.04.2020 11:54 schrieb Silvia Sánchez :
But from *where* do I download the ISO ?
On the wiki page are the download links.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/32/Fedora-32-20200421.0/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/
In regard to my testing of: Fedora-WS-Live-rawh-20200510-n-0
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to delete all and
In regard to: QA:Testcase base service manipulation
Back about a year ago now I started fiddling around with this test case
to see if I could make it a bit easier to run.
A little background first. After I have my test machine set up and ready
to start testing a new drop I always do the login
On 5/13/20 12:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
I ended up putting
(sudo su) at the top of each script and just ran the commands without
the (su -c). That seemed to work fine.
Is there a critical to the test reason to use (su -c)?
No. It really just means "do this as root". There are various ways y
This is in regard to my testing of Rawhide F33 Workstation drop 00620.n.1:
This was a bare metal install on a Lenovo M53 with a i5-4570 CPU. The
ISO was check summed and loaded to a thumb drive using Media Writer. The
test machine booted to Live normally. Anaconda started normally. Options
to
After the QA meeting today, I spent a few hours trying the get Rawhide
0703 WS Live installed with btrfs.
I have Rawhide 0703 WS Live on a thumb drive. I know this works fine
when taking the default for the disk. I was trying to do a bare metal
install to my test machine (Lenovo M53 with a
On 7/6/20 19:53, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:43 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I was not
successful in getting the disk configuration set in a configuration that
Anaconda would accept for installation.
Yeah, custom installation is a little bit of a mind-screw. :(
You are
On 4/13/19 13:17, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hello!
Just installed F30 beta workstation on a brand new E490 thinkpad[1]. I
am happy to report that everything's gone very well---installation and
set up. I've run into the gnome-clocks issue, which won't let me login
without the workaround[2,3].
I've clo
On 4/15/19 22:17, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Branched 20190415.n.2. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
h
In regard to my testing of F30 Workstation Live 0419 drop:
I downloaded the ISO and the check sum passed. The ISO was burned to DVD
and the DVD check sum passed. The test system (Lenovo M58p with E8400
processor) was booted to the DVD. The media test ran and passed.
Anaconda started and ran no
In the last QA team meeting (04/29/2019) I volunteered to help with
adding something to the blocker bug process to handle Last Minute
Blocker Bugs.
I started by reading:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q46M75GUKRHMI5IMNGBNL6XHLD5GLLTS/
Follo
I regard to testing Rawhide (F31) 0505 drop:
I ran several of the standard test cases and logged the results via
relval. I've continued testing with my local test cases and the notable
result so far is that RHBZ #1694782 applies to this drop.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tabl
This is a resend.
In the last QA team meeting (04/29/2019) I volunteered to help with
adding something to the blocker bug process to handle Last Minute
Blocker Bugs.
I started by reading:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q46M75GUKRHMI5IMNGBNL
This is the message I sent to the Desktop list on 04/29/2019.
Hi,
In the QA team meeting today. A suggestion came up in regard to Media
Writer. The idea is that it would be handy for Media writer to be part
of the standard install for Workstation Live. Media writer gets used a
lot to make boo
possible to use Live system to make USBs because there might be memory
issues.
Lukas
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:35 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
This is the message I sent to the Desktop list on 04/29/2019.
Hi,
In the QA team meeting today. A suggestion came up in regard to Media
Writer. The idea
In regard to my testing of Rawhide Workstation Live (F31) drop 0514.
The ISO was downloaded, checked summed, burned to DVD and check summed.
The DVD was used to boot bare metal (Lenovo M58p with E8400 processor)
The system booted to the DVD, media check ran and passed, and Anaconda
started and
Tomorrow is a holiday here; so I won't be at the QA meeting.
I did submit a draft to test@ as something to consider for the Last
Minute Blocker Bugs process. I received two e'mails with input, but I
thought it best to get the input from the meeting before I revised the
draft. Please let me kno
The following are notable results from my testing of Rawhide Workstation
Live (F31) drop 0529:
These are outside the scope of fedora standard testing, but I have
several test cases I run to test my "as deployed" configurations.
DNF fails to load large packages see RHBZ #1715617. The bug repor
I have added the requested information to the bugs as shown below:
Bug 1694782 - Authorization pop up can not be satified or dismissed
> So basically, the problem is that if you have an admin user with no
> password, when an action requiring admin privileges is attempted, you
> get this non-sat
I discovered something strange. In both F30 and Rawhide (F31) the file
/sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices is empty. That is it's a file of 0 bytes.
This file used to contain all the information about connected USB
devices. Does anyone know if this is part of an intended change or is it
a bug? If it
On 6/6/19 13:11, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 6:05 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I discovered something strange. In both F30 and Rawhide (F31) the file
/sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices is empty. That is it's a file of 0 bytes.
This file used to contain all the information
On 6/6/19 13:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 11:15 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 9:49 AM Richard Ryniker wrote:
I think you will find the file is not truly empty. /sys is not an actual
file system, merely an interface to kernel information. There is no
On 6/6/19 14:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/6/19 11:11 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 6/6/19 13:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 11:15 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 9:49 AM Richard Ryniker
wrote:
I think you will find the file is not truly empty. /sys
Proposed additions to the Blocker Bug Procedure to cover Last Minute
Blocker Bugs (tidied up version). In case we cover this today at the QA
meeting.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
BlockerBugs.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
The following are the notable results for my testing of Rawhide (F31)
drop 0624:
Several of the standard tests were run with passing results and the
results were logged via relval.
The new bug I reported last time seems to be fixed now. There were no
recurrences after many package removals a
Today I was just checking some stuff on my personal machine and found a
problem. This PC is a Lenovo H50-55 with an AMD® A10-7800 radeon r7, 12
compute cores 4c+8g processor. This problem does not show up on any of
the intel based Lenovo machines. I'm running fully updated F30
Workstation in
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
