Is it normal to have F15 beta boot times that are much longer than F14?
I have a fully up-to-date F14 running on a single-core Athlon-3300+
(4000 bogomips) on an AsRock MB and using a midrange Radeon RV770 gpu
and a single primary WD-1200JB PATA drive on the first PATA interface.
It boots to the l
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 10:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 06:08 AM, John Mellor wrote:
> >
> > What can I look at to determine where in the boot sequence that the
> > problem bottleneck is, and how do I do it?
> >
>
> systemd-analyze
>
>
On 2021-11-08 9:31 a.m., Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:25 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:05 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
"dnf install foo bar"
This is a single operation, comparable to having multiple packages installed
via graphical package manager, not schedu
current GUI installer behaves more like Windows, and does not allow this
situation when it most certainly should. Fedora should consider fixing
these packages that routinely allow developer errors instead of
downloading the resulting problems to the end user, and the installer
tools should
On 2022-01-20 11:54 a.m., Kamil Paral wrote:
This is another attempt at creating a new release criterion specific
for graphical package managers. We already discussed it in November,
but we couldn't agree easily on some particular details, and then I
was gone for a long time:
https://lists.fed
On 2022-01-21 5:54 p.m., Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 14:20 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
I am unclear from this proposal on what is supposed to happen if a
package is not completely installed. E.g: a powerdown or other outage
causes the post-install script in an installed rpm to
similar, but it does point out the need to
fill a large gap in keeping the machine sane when something unexpected
happens. Perhaps F36 can expedite btrfs gui and cli tools to roll back
to the last known sane state in both the normal and diagnostic images.
You know, lik
On 2022-04-21 23:13, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm getting: There are currently no products linked to this invitation code...
I'd bet that you cut/pasted the code with the sentence end as part of
it. Take the period off.
--
John Mellor
__
On 2024-11-01 3:51 p.m., Robert McBroom wrote:
The following packages have not been able to update for the last two
weeks. There is no indication what is preventing the updates
Skipping packages with conflicts:
libavcodec-free x86_64
7.0.2-6.fc42 rawhide
On 2025-01-23 2:51 p.m., Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 06:00 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
. . .
2) Are we forgetting why we have the concept of statically linked binaries?
What does that have to do with where they are?
If I may offer some insight:
In the Unix philos
On 2025-01-23 5:32 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/23/25 2:17 PM, John Mellor wrote:
On 2025-01-23 2:51 p.m., Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 06:00 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
. . .
2) Are we forgetting why we have the concept of statically linked
binaries?
What does
11 matches
Mail list logo
