On 2022-01-25 05:02, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 6:19 PM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

    On Mon, 2022-01-24 at 15:28 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
    > If this is about power outages, I don't see any problem here. A
    power
    > outage is not the package manager's failure, and so those
    criteria don't
    > apply.

    I can see someone proposing it, though. "I lost power in the middle of
    an update and now the system is unbootable". Whether it was
    "caused" by
    the power failure or the package manager is kind of a matter of
    perspective. I just figured it might be worth a footnote to explicitly
    specify that such situations aren't covered, for clarity. It's
    technically true that a system whose power got cut could fail all
    sorts
    of criteria, I guess...it just feels more likely that someone might
    think this criterion means the package manager is meant to handle
    it, I
    guess.


OK, so what about adding a note like this:

Note: Systems in an inconsistent state
While the package manager must not be the primary cause for breaking a system (unbootable, invalid internal structures, etc), it doesn't have to '''prevent''' these events from happening. So if there's e.g. a power outage during its operation or a package with harmful scriptlets is installed, which breaks the system, this is not the fault of the package manager and the criteria above are not considered violated. Similarly, when the package manager operates on an already broken system (e.g. with an inconsistent rpm database), the correct behavior cannot be guaranteed, and therefore the criteria also don't apply.

I'm ok with that or something similar, but it does point out the need to fill a large gap in keeping the machine sane when something unexpected happens. Perhaps F36 can expedite btrfs gui and cli tools to roll back to the last known sane state in both the normal and diagnostic images.  You know, like the Sun time-slider on the gui and maybe even the Apple time machine functionality.

--

John Mellor
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to