I have just faced this problem, on a Fedora 20 fresh install. All Fedora 19
works out of the box with the same setup. It seems a regression to me.
Raised https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022977.
>> Do Fedora maintainers raise upstream issues, or am I expected
>> to do that?
>>
>
AFAICS
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> I don't know why you see it as an F19 to F20 regression, because I'm
> fairly sure it's been broken the whole time.
I have two servers now running libvirtd + firewalld + NM, one is F19 and
the other (the newest) one is F20. I just checked
Hi!
I had a failing HD a couple weeks ago and needed something to copy a image
file inside this HD as far as I could. I was getting I/O errors during the
rsync of the image, so rdd seemed the best tool to do this, but
unfortunately it's is not available in Fedora.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/
> I recently used it to recover two HDs with read errors, successfully.
> You can find it here:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/ddrescue/ddrescue.html
>
>
Thank you for the info, I'll try ddrescue the next time I have this kind of
problem.
Regards,
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please, I need some help, I'm stuck in F19.
>
Nobody could at least point the right log files I can find anything useful?
It must be my lack of luck, but my main problem with Fedora is a reliable
upgrade tool. I was hopeful fedup would finish this, but my experience is
so far not so good...
--
B
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The journal. Almost everything is in the journal now. Certainly
> everything startup-related.
>
I tend to agree, but couldn't find something useful, so..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863
--
BrunoJCM
--
test mailing li
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night
> (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release).
>
> However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users
> will see an error about the p
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Greetings.
>>>
>>> systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last
>&g
Hi, all.
I'm using F20 and had some trouble to find where to setup my startup
applications. After a Google search, I figured out that we need to run
gnome-session-properties from a terminal or alt+f2 window. This screen is
not available when searching on Gnome Shell prompt. I personally think that
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 22:00 -0200, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> > Hi, all.
> >
> >
> > I'm using F20 and had some trouble to find where to setup my startup
> > applications.
>
> gnome-tweak-tool can
BrunoJCM
(Enviado do Tablet)
Em 17/12/2013 13:13, "Neal Becker" escreveu:
>
> success/failure?
I had this one, I reported on this list a few weeks ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863
fedup 0.8 also fixed the problem for me.
Thanks,
--
Bruno Medeiros
--
t
I have a recently installed F19 machine and I tried to fedup to F20. All
went fine until reboot... I choose the Fedup option on GRUB list, but my
system boots "normally" after that, I get a GDM login screen.
Are problems like this expected for now? Is it worth reporting as a bug?
Thanks,
--
Bru
> On 21 November 2013 11:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>>
>> Downloading failed: Errors were encountered while downloading packages.
>> ilmbase-1.0.3-7.fc20.x86_64: failure:
>> Packages/i/ilmbase-1.0.3-7.fc20.x86_64.rpm from cmdline-instrepo: [Errno
>> -1] Package does not match intended download. Sug
In the first try, 12h ago, I got the same error. I tried again a few
> minutes ago and I got the same problem
>
Just clarifying myself, 12h ago I got the same download problem reported by Ed
Greshko. I tried again now, after come back from work, and the download
problem is gone, but I got my origi
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Can you post the grub2.cfg ?
>
Sure, but it's a little big. Follows the relevant part, if you need the
whole file let me know.
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
menuentry 'Fedora, with Linux fedup' --class fedora --class gnu-linux
--c
Just to confirm that I choose the right grub entry, I opened
gnome-terminal, after GDM login, to check the booted kernel:
[brunojcm@brunojcm-fedora ~]$ cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/rootfedora/boot/vmlinuz-fedup
root=UUID=077370f6-d8b8-4be8-8cbb-2a13fb5244ac ro
rootflags=subvol=rootfedora rd.md=0
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:44 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> On 22 Nov 2013 02:20, "Bruno Medeiros" wrote:
> > I would bet it's btrfs related, as a lot of people have reported success
> on this procedure.
> >
>
> FWIW my laptop is on BTRFS from the def
17 matches
Mail list logo