On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: >> >> Greetings. >>> >>> systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last >>> night >>> (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). >>> >>> However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users >>> will see an error about the package not being signed. >>> >>> This has already been corrected and the signed package will be in >>> tomorrow's branched compose. Please wait for that compose to >>> update, or >>> if you need to test that the blocker is fixed, you can use >>> --nogpgcheck to upgrade to the new package. >>> >> >> BTW, any special reason for not having --nogpgcheck documented on "man fedup" ? I'm the reporter of bug >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863 [1] and I'm trying >> >> fedup 0.8.0 as suggested on this issue. I got the same error, but for >> the package systemd-libs: >> >> Package systemd-libs-208-9.fc20.x86_64.rpm is not signed >> >> Is this package also corrected? >> > > They all come from the same source package, so yes, it will be. > Thanks for the info. -- BrunoJCM
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
