No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 8:38 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
>
> I have completed a first draft of my proposed revision to the
> "QA:Testcase package install remove" Base test case. I got some input
> based on my initial e'mail on this. I believe I have addressed those
> items.
>
> I believe it i
I believe the purpose of the test case is to have a very generic test case
that works in all environments (not just graphical ones) and applies to all
package managers (notably dnf, packagekit, gnome-software, discover,
dnfdragora, etc -- but not rpm, that is one level below them). It relies on
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:02 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
>
>
> > I believe the purpose of the test case is to have a very generic test
> case
> > that works in all environments (not just graphical ones) and applies to
> all
> > package managers (notably dnf, packagekit, gnome-software, discove
On 2/7/20 10:31, Kamil Paral wrote:
So we're slowly getting back to the original version of the test case. It
still contains instructions to check that applications start correctly,
which I believe is not the point of the test case.
I can certainly see that
It's missing
verification via rp
On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 18:21 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > Proposed changes to the Desktop release criteria for ARM and AArch64 in
> > > > Fedora 32:
> > > > * drop Xfce on 32-bit ARM from release blocking desktops
> > > > * add Workstation on AArch64 to release blocking desktops
> > >
>
On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 11:53 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> In retrospect my initial thinking on this test case was erroneous.
> Most
>
> of my carrer was spent making sure the documents I wrote were as
>
> comprehensive as possible and left little to doubt. I'm getting used
> to
>
> ho
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
25 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 99/169 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fed
Hi,
It seems like every time I upgrade this system this list of problems gets
bigger. Is something broken? A repo? A process?
This is a FC32 x86_64 (Rawhide) system.
I'm not sure how to handle these problems. Can anyone offer suggestions?
Best regards,
George...
Problem 1: cannot install the
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
11 matches
Mail list logo
