On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 18:21 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > Proposed changes to the Desktop release criteria for ARM and AArch64 in > > > > Fedora 32: > > > > * drop Xfce on 32-bit ARM from release blocking desktops > > > > * add Workstation on AArch64 to release blocking desktops > > > > > > I am not following recent developments of chap arm based mini computers > > > (read: Raspberry Pis and alike), hence my question might be a bit stupid > > > here, but isn't Workstation a bit too resource-consuming for devices our > > > users are likely to run Fedora "desktop" on? I'm fine if we are targeting > > > the AArch64 based laptops, but are we OK with recommending either > > > Workstation or non-bocking spins for arm devices with less than 4GB RAM? > > > > Are there significant resource consumption differences between GNOME > > and GNOME Classic? Would GNOME Classic by default on aarch64 be a > > valid option? > > My understanding is that Classic is purely a look and feel thing.
Me too, more or less. They're still both composited by GNOME Shell. Maybe Classic uses fewer 3D effects, but I doubt that's going to make a significant difference. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
