On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 09:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 08:21:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade.
> >
> > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current
> > configuration*. So in the "ty
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 18:03 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:22 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade.
> >
> > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current
> > configuration*. So in the "typical" cas
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 08:21:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade.
>
> The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current
> configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a
> stable Fedora release with
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:22 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade.
>
> The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current
> configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a
> stable Fedora release with default repo
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 12:30 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as
> freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the
> base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder,
> isn't this approac
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:05 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
> The added work for a FE seems pretty minimal to me (3 people write +1, I
> push it to the accepted FE in about a minute), not sure if the releng
> perspective is different here though?
>
I see it a bit differently. Even when just consid
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:31 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as
> freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the
> base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder,
> isn't this approach
Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as
freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the
base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder,
isn't this approach mostly relevant for the Final release? Does it make
sense to