On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 00:16 -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
> James Laska writes:
> > Andre correctly reminded me that 'ssh' installer support is not intended
> > as a replacement for a telnet install. Rather, it is a means for
> > enabling 'ssh' to remotely monitor install progress. Translation, you
James Laska writes:
> Andre correctly reminded me that 'ssh' installer support is not intended
> as a replacement for a telnet install. Rather, it is a means for
> enabling 'ssh' to remotely monitor install progress. Translation, you
> can ssh into the installing system and monitor /tmp/*log or d
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 20:56 -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jon Hermansen writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Janina Sajka wrote:
> >
> > > Seems telnet installs are again broken. I've filed bug 639629 Submitted
> > > - Installation over telnet isn't working
> > >
> >
> If not, I have no way to install Fedora without assistance from
> someone. That would not be good at all.
>
Have you considered upgrading instead of a fresh install? Some users
reported success about a month ago:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-09-02_Preupgrade
Alternatively, you m
Hi,
Jon Hermansen writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
> > Seems telnet installs are again broken. I've filed bug 639629 Submitted
> > - Installation over telnet isn't working
> >
>
> James Laska recently mentioned that "the ability to telnet into the
> ins
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Seems telnet installs are again broken. I've filed bug 639629 Submitted
> - Installation over telnet isn't working
>
James Laska recently mentioned that "the ability to telnet into the
installer and direct the installation from the teln
Seems telnet installs are again broken. I've filed bug 639629 Submitted
- Installation over telnet isn't working
This has happened more than once in the past. It would be REALLY REALLY
nice if this functionality could be among the things verified before new
distribution releases. Since it does kee
I am looking at all the bug issues online and decided I would like to
give some encouraging words or reports about Fedora 14 Beta.
I am running Dell 9400 Inspiron with a T7400 processor, 4 g of memory,
Go7900GTX gpu and all seems to run well.
The only things that are still in trouble are the
Greetings,
It's time to summarize F-14 Beta RC validation tests. Apologies for the
absence of some RC3 install testing, but I'm glad to see that it went on
smoothly, so special thanks for the ones who helped executing the cases.
Though Beta has been declared gold based on the Beta release
criterio
I had tried to attend, but internets went down just before the meeting started.
J. H. Dulaney
> Subject: Re: Fedora 14 Beta Readiness
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:00:43 -0700
>
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 12:45
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 12:45 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:49 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We did not have representatives from Documentation, QA, or Translation
> > at the Fedora 14 Beta Release Readiness meeting today.
>
>
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:49 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We did not have representatives from Documentation, QA, or Translation
> at the Fedora 14 Beta Release Readiness meeting today.
Apologies, I was unable to attend.
> Please make sure that your team has dou
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:38 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:27:21 -0700, Adam wrote:
>
> > Ah, I see. Sorry, I was a little tired; you said 'F14 RC3 i386 DVD iso
> > is broken',
>
> It was my summary/conclusion of the longer paragraph above it in
> the same mail. :)
>
>
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:27:21 -0700, Adam wrote:
> Ah, I see. Sorry, I was a little tired; you said 'F14 RC3 i386 DVD iso
> is broken',
It was my summary/conclusion of the longer paragraph above it in
the same mail. :)
> so I didn't quite grok that you were referring to a more
> complex case th
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 10:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:13:29 -0700, Adam wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 19:57 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > > A bug. F14 RC3 i386 DVD iso is broken.
> > >
> > > F13 x86_64 installer doesn't suffer from that problem when us
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:13:29 -0700, Adam wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 19:57 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > A bug. F14 RC3 i386 DVD iso is broken.
> >
> > F13 x86_64 installer doesn't suffer from that problem when using exactly
> > the same steps to install it.
>
> ajwerkman and robatino
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 19:57 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A bug. F14 RC3 i386 DVD iso is broken.
>
> F13 x86_64 installer doesn't suffer from that problem when using exactly
> the same steps to install it.
ajwerkman and robatino both marked this test as passing in the matrix:
https://fedorap
Hi,
We did not have representatives from Documentation, QA, or Translation
at the Fedora 14 Beta Release Readiness meeting today.
Please make sure that your team has double-checked and coordinated any
tasks you depend on other teams for to be completed on time for a
successful Beta release
> A bug. F14 RC3 i386 DVD iso is broken.
>
> F13 x86_64 installer doesn't suffer from that problem when using exactly
> the same steps to install it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/627789
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:38 -0600, Petrus wrote:
> > When booting this installation, I arrive at gdm's greeter without
> > any firstboot procedure. No user account is available except root.
> > Firstboot package is installed, but not added to any runlevel.
> > What has gone wrong?
>
> I had this a
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> When booting this installation, I arrive at gdm's greeter without
> any firstboot procedure. No user account is available except root.
> Firstboot package is installed, but not added to any runlevel.
> What has gone wrong?
I had this a coupla weeks ago. No sweat, just lo
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:35:19 -0400, James wrote:
> How did you install?
DVD iso placed on a storage partition. Created a GRUB entry for the
installer vmlinuz+initrd and pointed Anaconda at the iso partition.
> Manually vs kickstart?
Manually, but unattended after filling in the necessary screen
t-1.113-3.fc14,metacity-2.30.0-8.fc14,kdebase-workspace-4.5.1-3.fc14
Those packages are included in F-14-Beta (RC3)
# for DVD in Fedora-14-Beta-*-DVD.iso ; do isoinfo -f -i $DVD | grep
"\/\(firstboot\|metacity\)" ; done
/Packages/firstboot-1.113-3.fc14.i686.rpm
/Packages/metacity-2.
> $ rpm -q upstart-sysvinit firstboot
> upstart-sysvinit-0.6.5-8.fc14.i686
> firstboot-1.112-3.fc14.i686
This one ought to be included with RC3:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firstboot-1.113-3.fc14,metacity-2.30.0-8.fc14,kdebase-workspace-4.5.1-3.fc14
> $ chkconfig --list firstboot
> s
7;s Beta RC3 you're
> testing, you didn't accidentally download an earlier image?
Well, it's the image advertised/linked in the RC3 release announcement:
http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.RC3/Fedora/i386/iso/
$ sha256sum Fedora-14-Beta-i386-DVD.iso
8cf3
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 09:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 03:48:58 -0400, Andre wrote:
>
> > Fedora 14 Beta RC3 is now available [1].
>
> Is this the one that was declared GOLD a day later?
Yes.
> Downloaded the i686 DVD iso yesterday. Installe
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 03:48:58 -0400, Andre wrote:
> Fedora 14 Beta RC3 is now available [1].
Is this the one that was declared GOLD a day later?
Downloaded the i686 DVD iso yesterday. Installed it onto a multiboot
machine. Custom partitioning. Root on LVM. Boot on primary partition.
Home
At the Fedora 14 Beta Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 14 Beta was
declared GOLD and ready for release on September 28, 2010.
Thank you to everyone who made this on-time release possible!
===
#fedora-meeting: Fedora 14 Beta Go
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:59 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
>
> Wednesday, September 22, 2010 @ 21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
I will be at the meeting, but may be a bit delayed depending on traffic.
* AdamW has posted
eting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting."
"Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of
the QA Team."
For more details about this meeting see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
In the meantime keep an eye on the Fedora 14 Beta Blocker list
-09-21 at 03:48 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Fedora 14 Beta RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
> pages for download links and testing instructions.
>
> Installation:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
>
Fedora 14 Beta RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 14 Beta RC2 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 14 Beta RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Greetings testers,
Again, thanks to the hard working of developers, release engineers and
testers, F-14-Beta-TC1 was posted and the tests have been executed. Here
I summarize the test results from installation and desktop sides grouped
by release criterion:
* *Installatio
John Poelstra said the following on 09/09/2010 05:19 PM Pacific Time:
> When: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
> Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> Without these bugs fixed we can't compose the Fedora 14 Beta Release
> Can
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:21:41 -0400
James Laska wrote:
> I've added this to F14Blocker as hard drive installs are covered under
> the final release criteria...
I tested the hard drive install at the same time I was testing
the vesa driver, and hard drive install was indeed working OK
in TC1 (as w
Thanks for the feedback Tom, comments below.
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 21:59 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> This one seemed pretty bad to me:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073
>
> Maybe the ATI problem is fixed now (it sort of seemed like
> it might already have been fixed but didn
On 09/09/2010 05:46 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1].
This image (http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/i386/os/)
appears to be useless for network/kickstart installs. I've pxe booted the
images from there and downloaded the install.
This one seemed pretty bad to me:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073
Maybe the ATI problem is fixed now (it sort of seemed like
it might already have been fixed but didn't quite make it
into F14 alpha), but vesa also not working was pretty mysterious.
I'd certainly hope this one
When: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Without these bugs fixed we can't compose the Fedora 14 Beta Release
Candidate on 2010-09-16.
We'll be discussing these bugs to determine if they meet the criteria,
should stay on the lis
Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Greetings testers,
As scheduled, F-14 Beta Test Compose is going to be available soon,
please keep attention on it and execute the installation[1] and
desktop[2] tests to help ensure that the F-14 Beta Release Criterion is
met[3].
Test result pages with detailed testing instructions are at:
h
#fedora-bugzappers: F-14-Beta blocker review
Meeting started by jlaska at 16:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-08-27/f-14-beta-blocker-review.2
> When: Friday, 2010-08-27 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST)
> Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Right of the coat tails of Fedora 14 Alpha, it's time for another
installment of the blocker bug review meeting! Friday kicks
off the first of several Beta bug review meetings.
If you are the owne
45 matches
Mail list logo
