James Laska writes:
> Andre correctly reminded me that 'ssh' installer support is not intended
> as a replacement for a telnet install.  Rather, it is a means for
> enabling 'ssh' to remotely monitor install progress.  Translation, you
> can ssh into the installing system and monitor /tmp/*log or do whatever
> else you want from a shell.  Essentially, it provides the shell you
> normally get on tty2, but over the network.
> 
So, what's the new way to install on a remote machine where one has no
hands-on access? What do those of us with machines at dataplexes like
The Planet, or with virtual machines on services like Virtual Host do?

To my mind ssh would be a perfect replacement for telnet for all the
obvious security reasons.

If, however, the answer is vnc, then I'm compelled to point out that
leaves some of us out of the party.

Janina




> Thanks,
> James



> -- 
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe: 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


-- 

Janina Sajka,   Phone:  +1.443.300.2200
                sip:jan...@asterisk.rednote.net

Chair, Open Accessibility       jan...@a11y.org 
Linux Foundation                http://a11y.org

Chair, Protocols & Formats
Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Reply via email to