Re: F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

2013-10-04 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:47:35 -0400 Gene Czarcinski wrote: > Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named: > Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso > rather than: > Fedora-20-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso > > I notice that the spin and live ISOs are all named "Beta

Re: F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

2013-10-03 Thread Andre Robatino
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:15:01 + (UTC) > Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > In principle it would be nice if both TCs and RCs were named > > uniquely, but I realize it would be even more of a hassle to rename > > the RC and recreate/edit the checksum

Re: F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

2013-10-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:15:01 + (UTC) Andre Robatino wrote: > BTW, the same name issue appears when booting the install images - > they are named "20-Beta", instead of "20-Beta-TC1". How important is > it to name the TCs differently? It seems like just a user convenience > (and a hassle for who

Re: F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

2013-10-03 Thread Andre Robatino
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes: > No, his point is that that's how it *should* be, but for TC1, doesn't > appear to be the case - the DVD and netinst images are named as if they > were RCs. BTW, the same name issue appears when booting the install images - they are named "20-Beta", instead o

Re: F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 3 October 2013 12:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 11:20 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > > > On 3 October 2013 08:47, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > > Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named: > > Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso > > rather th

Re: F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

2013-10-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 11:20 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On 3 October 2013 08:47, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named: > Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso > rather than: > Fedora-20-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso > >

Re: F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 3 October 2013 08:47, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named: > Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.**iso > rather than: > Fedora-20-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso > > I notice that the spin and live ISOs are all named "Beta-TC1" rather than > just "Beta" > > Yes, I know, a nit. >

F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

2013-10-03 Thread Gene Czarcinski
Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named: Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso rather than: Fedora-20-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso I notice that the spin and live ISOs are all named "Beta-TC1" rather than just "Beta" Yes, I know, a nit. Gene -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs