On 3 October 2013 12:23, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 11:20 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > > > On 3 October 2013 08:47, Gene Czarcinski <g...@czarc.net> wrote: > > Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named: > > Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso > > rather than: > > Fedora-20-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso > > > > I notice that the spin and live ISOs are all named "Beta-TC1" > > rather than just "Beta" > > > > Yes, I know, a nit. > > > > > > > > Not a nit, a misunderstanding. All Test Candidates are prominently > > named TCn with the version number as 1. Only at the Release candidate > > stage does the extra letters go away. > > No, his point is that that's how it *should* be, but for TC1, doesn't > appear to be the case - the DVD and netinst images are named as if they > were RCs. > My apologies to everyone. I have clearly failed 4th grade English comprehension. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
