On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:46:46AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 11:18 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote:
> > > I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response:
> > >
el-ark/-/issues/176
>
> The last debug kernel that worked for me was 6.12.1.
Ah, ok.
Do regulrar rawhide kernels boot ok for you?
(nothing after rc2 here works, I get it not finding the rootfs and
haven't had any time to debug too much further).
kevin
--
__
fortunately 'modules' is not
very clear to me at least. ;)
Perhaps you could provide what you are trying to do and all the output
from that?
Thanks,
kevin
--
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
nnot find any errors or rejects.
yahoo often blocks us. All it seems to take is one person marking a
mailing list that they confirmed signing up to as spam and they seem to
like blocking our entire domain for all users.
However, it doesn't seem to b
mailing list.
What url are you going to? The list is definitely active...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
esting enabled
> One specific expectation is that the updates-testing repository and any
> corresponding repositories (e.g. updates-testing-modular) must be enabled
> for upgrades to beta and fresh installs.
*modular* should be gone completely now, so drop mention of it?
> Please
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 08:40:47AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 09:21 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:26:07PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:19 PM Ian Laurie wrote:
> > > >
> &
> FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
> > TZ: Australia/Sydney
>
> Can you log in to https://kerneltest.fedoraproject.org/
> and manually upload the logs?
> see if that works.
kerneltest was just upgraded, so likely the
https://pagure.io/kernel-tests.git needs adjustments for the
ot able to accept it or do anything else because it
wanted them to accept first.
If thats the case, I can ask our matirx contacts to fix your account.
I suppose also you could make a new account and try with it to confirm
you get the agreement and things work with it?
kevin
signature.asc
Descri
or Beta, we unlock the stable pushes
again, so by the time Beta is actually released, most of those packages
are already stable and in the base repo, no?
Of course that doesn't help testers, but they likely know how to enable
updates-testing?
It seems like to me easier to just tell them 'm
not any critera/testing for branch
point. We just get a successfull compose there. Beta and Final are
actually releases with testing, etc.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 10:34:41AM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote:
> On 2/17/23 09:20, Ian Laurie wrote:
> > On 2/17/23 04:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Can you file a xfce4-session bug?
> >
> > No problem, here it is:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
eally bad idea.
No, I am pretty sure this was not intended.
Can you file a xfce4-session bug?
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@li
;t recall where off
hand).
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en
not been an issue in Fedora 37.
It's likely the crypto-policy disallowing SHA-1.
See:
https://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2023/01/31/error-rpmdbnextiterator-skipping-in-fedora-38/
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/certain-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-s
he touchbar thing and last I tried it,
fedora will boot, but the keyboard doesn't work at all. That was like a
year or so ago tho, so I should try again. ;)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.
OK
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> package bcompare is not installed
>
> This output is clearly wrong, because bcompare is installed and working.
>
> Is there a way to get around this problem and force the install?
You can change your crypto policy:
sudo update-crypto-policies --se
w that debian is moving to it also
perhaps they can re-land the port or have some kind of runtime check and
work with either.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
e 'and
such package groups as working groups decide are critical to their
edition' ?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedor
gt; be able to untag the new build and the compose won't be completely
> broken. If we had this testing deployed in prod and gating turned on,
> the update would be blocked automatically.
It's been untagged from rawhide and eln.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
logging in to a release-blocking desktop, if the user account does
> not have its own keyboard layout configuration for that desktop (if there
> is such a user/desktop-specific configuration, it must be used when that
> user logs in to that desktop)
> ~~~
nicate
>
> I came across this when I was trying to access the kernel regression wiki.
> Any update on why or am I accessing something wrong?
This sometimes happens when backups are being run. :(
Unfortunately we haven't been able to find a way to avoid it happening
someti
last week was pretty
busy for me, so I didn't reboot until the weekend, so I had a pile of
updates in that transaction that broke things. :(
Perhaps someone else has a smaller list of packages between the normal
and broken states?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Mohan Boddu wrote:
> EOL process takes some time and we cannot delay it to the next day
And why exactly would that be?
I do not think any user would complain about getting updates for one day
longer than originally announced.
Kevin Kof
e states could be added of course,
but it's more work.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora C
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:47:39AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 11:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Hey folks.
> >
> > I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of upgrades after a
> > release
> > is 'go' but before it&#
test this fully before there is an updates repo (I mean we kind
of can with updates-testing, but it's not the exact same repo).
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
ry again and/or with "--refresh"?
> Hi Mark, thank you for your reply, but no success, same result.
>
> Trying additionally previously "dnf clean all", but without any success.
>
> Kind regards
Update to the latest systemd. It has some systemd
t have hit it just as I was doing that. ;(
Anyhow please try again and it should be working...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to t
ds from power on, but 10 seconds from the
> time the boot up reaches the state where we expect gnome-initial-setup
> or its counterparts to appear.
Sounds reasonable to me. +1
I mean, I'd be fine changing the time a little or wording, but I agree
with the general gist of it.
kevin
sign
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via test wrote:
>
> Kevin,
>
> Thanks for submitting those PRs. Do you have a sense of when the
> scripts will actually be updated and the older files flushed?
The scripts are updated now, but rawhide compose faile
Just a heads up for anyone running rawhide and using swapfiles: There's
some nasty corruption in 5.12-rc1. ;(
https://lwn.net/Articles/848265/ has details.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list --
d in a recent change in the scripts that
sync rawhide and branched. ;(
I just made some PR's to fix it:
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1014
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1015
as soon as those get reviewed this should get fixed.
Thanks for noting it!
said, for the time being I am sadly away from my computer,
> having to do things on my phone, and a Chromebook.
Sure, lots of people move off to the newly branched fedora at this time
and follow it out until release. Then re-upgrade to rawhide and repeat.
;)
kevin
signature.asc
Desc
location. If in case you need to
> > provide the image to your users, they can verify the image by the signed
> > checksum available in the above link as well.
>
> Hey Mohan, I notice the CHECKSUM file here is not readable.
Fixed.
kevin
s
jack clients
talk to pipewire, and think it's their daemon. They still use
pulseaudio-libs and jack libs to talk it, but pipewire daemon "speaks"
both those protocols, so as far as they know everything is exactly the
same.
So, you co
t yet landed.
Your best bet right now is:
sudo update-crypto-policies --set DEFAULT:FEDORA32
for now.
kevin
PS: no need to cc me on replies to the list. I'm subscribed and read
posts. ;)
--
>
> Regards
> Onyeibo
>
> On Fri Dec 18, 2020 at 5:30 PM WAT, Adam Williamson wr
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 02:01:22PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Just another heads up for folks.
>
> The glib2-2.67.1 update (in the rawhide thats composing right now) seems
> to cause gdm to crash here. Downgrading to 2.67.0 everything is working
> again.
>
>
it or gather more information for the
above bug. :)
kevin
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/co
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908018
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
t; login. glib_2 appears to be in the message as well.
>
> Any thoughts/hints/tips/suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> Best regards and STAY SAFE,
This is likely the fprintd bug that Adam mentioned in the list
yesterday. ;(
So, upgrade fprintd (or remove it).
kevin
signature.asc
n, but in the mean time as a workaround you can
use 'newgrp wheel' and then sudo.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
sy
to find the proposal in the bug... but on occasion there's a ton of
comments and it's not so easy.
Anyhow, this was just a thought, if there's no way to implement it
currently then there isn't. The new process is still a win on lots of
other levels. :)
kevin
signature.asc
De
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 08:29:52PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Sometimes the ticket titles were not very informative, but thats more
> > the fault of the bug really.
> >
>
> Well, we can easily add e.g. the
r a cleanup cycle? ie, now that f33 is out, close
out all the f33 tickets?
> Thanks a lot for your thoughts. 🍪
>
> PS: You can also report bugs or request improvements anytime in the future
> at [4].
>
> Kamil
Thanks for putting all this together!
kevin
signature.a
if you want to view the changed document:
https://pagure.io/fork/kevin/fesco/fesco-docs/raw/updates-update/f/fesco/modules/ROOT/pages/Updates_Policy.adoc
(you may want to install a adoc viewing extension in your browser to
view it)
Feedback welcome here or in the PR.
FESCo is likely to look at
odern web a bit difficult.
> Thank you all for your advice, tips, and hard work.
Thanks for your reports and testing. :)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:03:29PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> > "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
> &
bugzilla has to generate, network has to
send and deliver and we have to drop in the bitbucket.
But, perhaps there's some secret clever use for it I am not aware of?
If you can think of some reason to keep it, speak up. ;)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
this case uses a metalink? Does it?
If we want to keep supporting FTP, we may have to test it locally as
mirrormanager doesn't support it anymore.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.
hat said, we have a machine up now there and it's just needing
configuration/setup to get the service back up and running. :)
So, hopefully soon it will again be online.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@list
Sad news indeed. ;(
He will be missed...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
uilder that had it's kojid OOm.
We are looking into the problem to prevent it from happening again.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le..
is clear.
It was an issue with the docs pipeline, it should be all fixed now.
kevin
--
>
> vriendelijke groeten Jaap Bosman
>
>
> On 21-06-2020 18:11, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> > fo
h.
Well, rpms should be easy to remove as well. flatpaks are handy if you
are running silverblue, they are also sometimes nice because the stack
some application uses in rawhide is broken somwhere, and you can just
use the flatpak until it's fixed. The sandboxin
ntain the latest OS version,
> so it differs very much from what is commonly available on the market these
> days.
I have a new macbook here I can use to test this. I just need to get
some spare time to install it. It's one of the new ones with a touchbar,
etc.
kevin
signature.
k for others. :)
Anyhow, this list is probibly not the place for desktop advocacy,
so I'll stop here.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.
> I can't find the ticket where I went nuts about this before any more,
> but I've been saying it for a while :P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435423
You can blame me, because I said I would work on fixing it,
then never did. ;(
kevin
signature.asc
Descriptio
e don't track things in
general... although there is a initiative coming up to hopefully get
more information on that:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing lis
npackager sees your bug and fixes it. They can tell
you/update the bug, but if you send email to maintainers, they would
have no idea it even happened.
Anyhow, just a few cents...as others have noticed, there's no hard
guidelines here, just be kind and do the
could see the bugs users REALLY
want fixed.
I guess I would be most in favor of something leveraging bugzilla, since
thats where our bugs are (at least now).
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 06:05:34PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> In the upcoming Fedora 32, is Firefox defaulting to DNS over HTTPS (RFC
> 8484)?
No.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751410#c2
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
On 9/19/19 12:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 11:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 11:11 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On 9/18/19 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the record, it makes me sa
o I made:
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/ansible/vars/all/FedoraBranchedBodhi.yaml
You could use that?
Failing that we should try and get something in fpdc.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.f
ch to NetworkManager.
If it's not that I am not sure what it would be... check your journal
for any errors on boot?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
.. there are some bugs, but
most people seem to find them to not be too serious or numerous.
You're welcome to try and convince the Xfce sig over on the Xfce list.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tes
quest:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_fix_bugs_on_the_Fedora_Project_website
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora C
ist
> of attendees when the minutes come out. The only clue I have is that my
> user name appears in red. I suppose that might be to mark what I type.
>
> Any help will be appreciated.
Yeah, sorry about this... spammers made us set many of the channels so
that registered/identif
er it gets
picked up in the mass rebuild (if it's a toolchain change). It just
depends.
Mass rebuilds are done usually to enable some compiler or the like
change...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- t
.cgi?id=1637496
it's been fixed now, but you may need to do some manual cleanup.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedo
unday, but got distracted. ;(
In any case I think it's all cleared up now.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedorapro
be? Can we get someone to fix that please?
Thats yum not having the ability to handle rich deps.
It's very unlikely that anyone wants to implement rich deps handing in
yum at this point, so I don't think this is likely to ever be fixed.
kevin
signatur
it in the scriptlet. However, this might be a special case, because on
some arches we don't use grub2. But perhaps it could be conditionalized.
I'd say file a kernel bug or perhaps just mail the
ker...@lists.fedoraproject.org list to discuss.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
On 03/03/2018 10:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 21:59 -0600, Jay, Kevin wrote:
Hello Everyone,
My name is Kevin Jay. I am 55 and currently live and work in East
Texas.
I have personal and professional adminstering computer systems since
the
mid 80's. My interests turn
Hello Everyone,
My name is Kevin Jay. I am 55 and currently live and work in East Texas.
I have personal and professional adminstering computer systems since the
mid 80's. My interests turned to Linux about 17 years ago and continue
to this day.
I'm looking forward to working with
Hey stan.
I ran into this same issue here. It seems it's caused by
environment-modules. There's a bug on it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539856
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test ma
need a fix for
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/1685 in order to get this
working again.
Hopefully we will have a patch soon and they will be re-enabled.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list --
c/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-28-primary
in the latest fedora-repos-27 and fedora-repos-28.
If you are in an older release you could get it from
https://pagure.io/fedora-repos/blob/f27/f/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-28-primary
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
is doing right here and not applying updates
that break anything for you, so you just have to wait until they are
fixed and then they will be applied.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedor
a problem, I'll look into it...
Turns out to be a pungi bug... we already have a fix and a updated pungi
package on branched/rawhide composers, so it should be back tomorrow
hopefully.
If you like we can run another compose today...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
. We need to try and
do better there. (I was out on vacation last week, so it can't always be
me).
Anyhow, hopefully we will have a rawhide compose today, and if not I
will keep poking it to get it going...
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
a f26 kernel on a different release which means
> it'll be signed with a different key.
Note that if a package is signed and there's a written out rpm with
that signature you can download the signed copy with:
koji download-build --key= --arch=x86_64 kernel-whatever
where ke
;dnf history list' (it will
have a big E next to it for error) and then doing a 'dnf history redo
N' where N is the number of the transaction.
I've had mixed luck with that. sometimes it works, other times packages
have changed too much and it refuses.
If that doe
first. If you open an issue to track this then please
> link me to it.
I guess I only replied to the desktop list when I replied to this. ;)
This was fixed I think in https://pagure.io/pungi/pull-request/542
but we need a new pungi release/version with the fix on the compose
host(s).
kevin
pgpzBYGEg_aHI.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
tend to
just go through all the tests I easily can while I have the image
booted/installed.
kevin
pgp4uEfvlCtGl.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
ora-rawhide-compose-problems/
on how to look and see if it's failing and why.
Hopefully we will have a successfull compose this afternoon.
It looks like there were several issues to work through.
kevin
pgpTbMblpVCxC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Glenn, at All Things Open I learned from Preethi Thomas in her
presentation that there are Test days:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days
That might be a good place to start? I'm not sure because I'm in the
same position you are in, wanting to get involved.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:11 AM,
ages... but the badge didn't fire off.
I'd suggest filing a ticket with the badges folks to look and check.
kevin
pgpHZmTJxj1Ug.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
luations but badge for
> 20 karma didn't arrive.
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback in advance.
There was recently some problems with the bodhi web frontends not
properly sending fedmsgs.
It's since been fixed. The messages during that period are sadly lost,
but everyth
reboots you into the dnf
system-upgrade and it applies those downloads to bring your stable or
branched release to rawhide.
Hope that helps,
kevin
pgpPIMXh2cKSo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedorapr
that.
Note that the one change we did make was for the wiki... it needs cla+1
now.
We have talked about making a 'wikieditors' group and sponsoring in
anyone that needs to edit the wiki to that, but we haven't really
sorted that out yet.
kevin
pgpkK50ag9Km_.pgp
Description: O
even be enforced? You can sign into mailman with
yahoo or persona (which have no ideas about groups).
Fas does, but you can add arbitrary email addresses to your account.
In short, this is not the case that I know of, so no adjustment should
need to be made.
kevin
pgpL3RE1RN2FQ.pgp
Descriptio
make the decision
with.
kevin
pgprElwb6YVsJ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:21:55 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 16:27 +0300, Pavlo Rudyi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 16:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > Well the server is also open source, so sure, you could make a
> > > private
&
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:24:32 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 09:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Well, if you use https://meet.jit.si/ (Their hosted server) you
> > can use any web browser, it doesn't need any kind of dedicated
> > client.
>
>
> Do you not see drpms being generated for all of the release branches?
> (I certainly do.) If so, how could you come to the conclusion that
> drpms are being abandoned?
Right. They are not at all, no matter how much I might like it from the
server side. ;)
kevin
t; I'm very surpsised that jitsi isn't available in Fedora/RPMFusion.
Well, if you use https://meet.jit.si/ (Their hosted server) you
can use any web browser, it doesn't need any kind of dedicated client.
kevin
pgpu6T6Xdg1Rx.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
tes
ken for you on your hardware. It works fine for me here and I
think at several others, so it's not completely broken.
Anyhow, will try and get some X folks to look at that bug... sounds
like it might be affecting all ATI folks.
kevin
pgpKNFvbzTh51.pgp
Description: Ope
curl libcurl
show any problems?
Might be some 32bit fallout from fixing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340757
?
kevin
pgpRNpA09f08G.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
rd wired into the Fedora
> package dependencies?
Sure, otherwise the deps wouldn't be there. ;)
samba uses (optiionally) systemd logging.
samba libs are linked to by a lot of things to provide samba support.
kevin
pgpNiFB2uYo4Y.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
test ma
1 - 100 of 592 matches
Mail list logo
