Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-23 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 10/23/24 11:54, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 03:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: fedora-release-common-39-36.noarch was not removed (had a duplicate of 41) by the upgrade. This caused dnf to think I was still on 39 and why all the 39 packages remained Duplicate

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-22 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 10/22/24 7:48 AM, Scott Dowdle via test wrote: On Monday, October 21st, 2024 at 5:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, I do not know if this is the correct place for this, but ... Now this is weird. Really, Really WEIRD! Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-22 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 10/21/24 16:00, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, I do not know if this is the correct place for this, but ... Now this is weird.  Really, Really WEIRD! Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41 Beta. Now a fresh "# dnf upgrade" wants to download 3000+ FC39 rpm&#x

Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

2024-10-21 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
Hi All, I do not know if this is the correct place for this, but ... Now this is weird. Really, Really WEIRD! Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41 Beta. Now a fresh "# dnf upgrade" wants to download 3000+ FC39 rpm's. And "rpm -qa" shows 39 on everything. # cat /etc/redhat-r

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-28 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-28 11:07, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-04-27 09:43, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 6:22 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:48, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: "dnf remove network-scripts" And I just put it

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-28 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-04-27 09:43, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 6:22 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:48, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: "dnf remove network-scripts" And I just put it back in as qemu-kvm requires it to do bridge netwo

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 18:22, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:48, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: "dnf remove network-scripts" And I just put it back in as qemu-kvm requires it to do bridge networking (br0) Error starting domain: Cannot get interface MTU on 'br0&#

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 14:48, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: "dnf remove network-scripts" And I just put it back in as qemu-kvm requires it to do bridge networking (br0) ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

Re: ifdown access denied

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 16:08, Richard Ryniker wrote: Try: nmcli general permissions I suspect network-scripts is the "old way" and with Network Manager you need something else to specify who may do what with respect to network connections. Dang! maybe I am, missing something # nmcli general permi

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 15:41, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:44 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Why does    /usr/sbin/NetworkManager down eno2 not work? NetworkManager is the server, you never run it directly.  You talk to it over dbus using either an applet or the nmcli command. Then the man

Re: ifdown access denied

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 14:55, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, Fedora 32 # grep USERCTL /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno2 USERCTL=yes $ /usr/libexec/nm-ifdown eno2 Error: failed to load connection: access denied. $ ifdown eno2 Error: failed to load connection: access denied. GR -T

ifdown access denied

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
Hi All, Fedora 32 # grep USERCTL /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno2 USERCTL=yes $ /usr/libexec/nm-ifdown eno2 Error: failed to load connection: access denied. $ ifdown eno2 Error: failed to load connection: access denied. GR -T ___ tes

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 14:44, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:39, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:38 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:31, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:28 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:22, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:07 PM

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 14:39, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:38 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:31, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:28 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:22, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Fedora 32 ifup/ifdown

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 14:31, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:28 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-26 14:22, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Fedora 32 ifup/ifdown warns me it is about to be depreciated and to use NetworkManager instead. Question: Why

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 14:22, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/26/20 2:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Fedora 32 ifup/ifdown warns me it is about to be depreciated and to use NetworkManager instead. Question: Why does    # /usr/sbin/NetworkManager down eno2 not disconnect me, but    # nmcli dev

Re: NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-26 14:07, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Fedora 32 ifup/ifdown warns me it is about to be depreciated and to use NetworkManager instead. Question: Why does   # /usr/sbin/NetworkManager down eno2 not disconnect me, but   # nmcli dev disconnect eno2 does? Many thanks, -T

NetworkManager down eno2

2020-04-26 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
Fedora 32 ifup/ifdown warns me it is about to be depreciated and to use NetworkManager instead. Question: Why does # /usr/sbin/NetworkManager down eno2 not disconnect me, but # nmcli dev disconnect eno2 does? Many thanks, -T ___ test m

Re: Brave blocking upgrade

2020-04-21 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-21 21:28, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-04-22 11:49, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: On 2020-04-21 19:32, Ed Greshko wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 09:41 ToddAndMargo via test mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote:     On 2020-04-21 18:36, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020

Re: Brave blocking upgrade

2020-04-21 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-21 19:32, Ed Greshko wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 09:41 ToddAndMargo via test mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On 2020-04-21 18:36, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-04-22 08:21, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: >> Now the 64,000 dollar question is

Re: Brave blocking upgrade

2020-04-21 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-21 18:36, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-04-22 08:21, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Now the 64,000 dollar question is, is this a bug or normal operation? It is an issue for the Brave distribution to address.  Not related to Fedora. So, rpm was not suppose to overwrite the key? Sound a

Re: Brave blocking upgrade

2020-04-21 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 2020-04-20 18:30, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-04-19 04:58, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Dear Testers,  To get FC32 to upgrade on one of my VM's, I have to add     --disablerepo=brave*  to the following: #dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh --disablerepo=brave* ... # dnf s

Brave blocking upgrade

2020-04-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
Dear Testers, To get FC32 to upgrade on one of my VM's, I have to add --disablerepo=brave* to the following: #dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh --disablerepo=brave* ... # dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 --allowerasing --best --disablerepo=brave* I opened: G

Thunderbird 68.8

2020-04-13 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
Dear Testers, I am getting reports from colleagues that Thunderbird 68.8 dumps your message filters. Reverting to 68.7 brings them back. Would you please make sure messages filters work with an new Thunderbird release on our horizon? Many thanks, -T

Re: Qemu issue upgrading to FC31

2019-11-04 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 11/2/19 5:01 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, Fedora 30, attempting to upgrade to Fedora 31 # dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31 --allowerasing --best --skip-broken Error:  Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package qemu-system-x86-core-2

Re: Qemu issue upgrading to FC31

2019-11-02 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
On 11/2/19 5:01 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, Fedora 30, attempting to upgrade to Fedora 31 # dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31 --allowerasing --best --skip-broken Error:  Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package qemu-system-x86-core-2

Qemu issue upgrading to FC31

2019-11-02 Thread ToddAndMargo via test
Hi All, Fedora 30, attempting to upgrade to Fedora 31 # dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31 --allowerasing --best --skip-broken Error: Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package qemu-system-x86-core-2:4.1.0-4.fc30.x86_64 - problem with installed packag

Re: Cups, SMB and passwords

2019-04-19 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 4/17/19 12:21 AM, berend.de.schou...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, In F30, does anyone else have a problem printing to network printers that require passwords?  I've got a work printer that uses SMB and has a password prompt, but authentication no longer works. I get a popup that says "authenticat

add legacy bios to boot

2019-04-18 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, Please forgive the slightly off topic nature of this letter. I am posting here because I know you guys have the answer. And it worked under 29, but not 30 beta. So, maybe not so off topic. I have a flash drive with FC30 beta installed on it. /dev/sda1 has a 1 M "grub_bios" partition

add legacy bios to boot

2019-04-17 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, Please forgive the slightly off topic nature of this letter. I am posting here because I know you guys have the answer. And it worked under 29, but not 30 beta. So, maybe not so off topic. I have a flash drive with FC30 beta installed on it. /dev/sda1 has a 1 M "grub_bios" partition

Re: Xfce 4.12

2019-04-13 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 4/13/19 1:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 4/12/19 8:18 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, Would you guys please consider going back to Xfce 4.12 in Fedora 30?  Xfce 4.13 is just too buggy! Well, this is likely a topic for the fedora xfce list, not the test list. That said, I don't reall

dual boot not working

2019-04-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-30-20190329.n.0.iso I am attempting to get a flash drive with Fedora and Xfce installed on it to dual boot. This procedure worked under Fedora 29. It boots fine from EUFI. From legacy bios, it goes to "system setup" What am I doing wrong? Many thanks, -T Thi

Xfce 4.12

2019-04-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, Would you guys please consider going back to Xfce 4.12 in Fedora 30? Xfce 4.13 is just too buggy! Many thanks, -T ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora C

Re: 30 upgrade does not take

2019-04-08 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 4/8/19 6:16 PM, sixpack13 wrote: some days ago I did: 1. sudo dnf upgrade --refresh 2. sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade 3. sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30 --setopt='module_platform_id=platform:f30' --allowerasing - the above is ONE line with a blank

Re: 30 upgrade does not take

2019-04-08 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 4/8/19 6:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 17:13 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, This is what I am running to upgrade from 29 to 30 beta: # rpm --rebuilddb # rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest if anything is too new, do a # dnf downgrade offender(s) (no

30 upgrade does not take

2019-04-08 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, This is what I am running to upgrade from 29 to 30 beta: # rpm --rebuilddb # rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest if anything is too new, do a # dnf downgrade offender(s) (no problems found) # dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh # dnf install python3-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade # dnf