r shows me the
internal display enabled and available.
Not sure, if it's a GDM issue then.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 15/06/16 09:26, Joachim Backes wrote:
> I installed switchdesk and tried the change my desktop environment
> simply by calling
>
> switchdesk
>
> The switchdesk manpage says: This should present a dialog box
> which allows the user to choose between the available desktops
> installed on t
pply.
Matthias
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
65658
[2]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-9006/redhat-lsb-4.1-14.fc19
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Good to know, thank you.
Interesting part is a kernel from f18 works, and the 3.10-rc?? from
rawhide-nodebug works as well.
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
> Any hints, how to debug this? The output I see is caps-lock/scroll-lock
> blinking
Just for completeness, I filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964066
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
_reply="0"
destination="org.freedesktop.NetworkManager" (uid=0 pid=416
comm="/usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon ")
which doesn't really look connected for me at all.
Any hints, how to debug this? The output I see is caps-lock/scroll-lock
blinking..
can never
> remember how to prevent that, or find instructions to do so, since
> systemd replaced sysvinit. :-(
Instead you should:
yum install systemd-analyze
and then execute systemd-analyze blame
or systemd-analyze plot > bootchart.svg
(probably the latter, and please post that grap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2012 01:41 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 13:23:10 +0100 Matthias Runge
> wrote:
>
>> I remember that one on a kvm virtual machine, filed as bug:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870007
dm files in integral states, check
> /etc/lightdm if you're using the old or the updated config files
> (if you have *.rpmnew files, these are the new ones so you might
> want to merge them. rpmconf is a tool made for that). Also make
> sure you reverted that comment on /etc/pam.d/light
lling a virtual machine, e.g via aeolus or so,
imho that doesn't get counted. In most cases, these are machines run on
kvm/xen hosts.
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
se of virtualization....
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
of real hardware? Because it's the 21st century and we would
loose warranty?
N!, right?
We definitely need to ensure, Fedora runs quite well as dual boot
installation.
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://a
x27;s a review request for bumblebee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827167
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
each time, when dependencies break?
IMHO requiring bz reports will drastically lower the number of testing
reports, especially when you need to file a bug.
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
rk for me on f17 (with unchanged config)
for cifs-filesystems. I'm seeing here many nfs4 mounts. It may be
related to some kerberos change? sssd?
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
ent a run-time test-suite dffers from a test suite to
be executed during build.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me.
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
PI/ABI bumps, but also changed/broken behaviour, produced somewhere else.
Most of required description is already there, so it can't be to hard,
to execute those tests from check-section.
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
when submitting an update run checks of dependent
packages)
If yes, how to automate this? Is there a way to access the check-section
of a package from outside?
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
esh-packagekit
Determining fastest mirrors
fedora/metalink | 31 kB
[...]
No Matches found
Where did you get that binary? You should report an error against that.
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
his was an error, as it is not intended to have installed
both.
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796373
--
Matthias Runge
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
o reproduce the
situtation _now_ on _my_ special system? Since I can't login, I can't
get a package list.
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBA
with newegg?
I can't reproduce this.
firefox-7.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64
Further more: is this a bug in fedora or is this a bug on this special
web page? I would say the latter, although I understand your annoyance.
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
> kevin
>
>
>
> ___ test-announce
> mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
>
>
>
- --
Matthias Runge
this problem.
I'm pretty sure, nearly nobody would notice 10% deviation.
Looking at the bug report[1] knurd mentioned, I'll try a kernel 2.6.40
to see, what happens.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735268
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEG
rg-Update (Xorg-common, Xorg-server). I'm
nearly sure, this regression was fixed with that update, which circles
me back to the benchmark-question.
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux
me and 'bam' tab was shown. Currently it
looks like one can track each element painted on the screen.
Is there a graphics benchmark to try out?
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - htt
gt;>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> 2011/3/31 Matthias Runge:
>>>>>
>>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> the subject sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
the subject says all:
Since systemd(?) update an hour ago, my test system does not boot any
more. removing "rhgb quiet" from kernel command line shows
Failed to load SELINUX policy
Failed to set security context... for /run: invalid argument
Fa
On 30/11/10 10:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:31:31 +0100, Matthias wrote:
>
>> On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>>
>>> Things that some people see as problematic are:
>>>
>>> * Having to wait a week to push a
On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> Things that some people see as problematic are:
>
> * Having to wait a week to push an update if you can't find testing
> * Testing being required for packages with automated test suites
> * The de
On 22/11/10 18:01, Marudhu Pandiyan wrote:
> I'm using F13 on a Intel Core2 duo i686 architecture 32bit.
> Intel Mobile chipset Graphics card.
>
> Gnome as the Prefered Desktop.
>
> But i dn know wat does the "desktop environment" going to do in suspending
> the
> system. And i686 or i386 or i
On 02/09/10 08:29, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
>> Anyhow, what a waste of time all around. I spend a couple of painful hours
>> booting and rebooting my system to try and isolate this bug and the
>> developers couldn't take two minutes to mention that they needed to post the
>> kernel and that they would
On 02/09/10 03:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Because there are always suspend issues, kernel team doesn't consider
> suspend problems a blocker for release.
This is really sad; just a few Fedora releases suspended and resumed
fine right of the box on my T43 Thinkpad, F 13 belonged to them.
I really
35 matches
Mail list logo
