On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:46:46AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 11:18 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote:
> > > I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response:
> > >
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote:
> I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334643
>
> I also opened an issue on the kernel-ark repo a few days ago:
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:16:09AM +0100, lejeczek via test wrote:
> Hi guys/devs
>
> Does anybody has a watchful eye on it ? not just one but at least couple of
> latest "kernel-debug" do _not_ load in.
>
> many thanks, L.
Can you provide more information here? Unfortunately 'modules' is not
ve
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 06:00:07AM +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have several questions about this "movement".
>
> 1) Why do this?
>
> 2) Are we forgetting why we have the concept of statically linked binaries?
>
> 3) When was this discussed? I ask this because I have exp
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:45:32PM -0400, Robert McBroom wrote:
> Can't access bugzilla for fedora 41. The bugzilla login I've used no longer
> works. tried to do a FAS registration but that doesn't work either.
Can you perhaps expand on 'doesn't work' ?
Do you get an error?
> Can access the te
On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 11:05:46PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> A few moons ago, I volunteered to write a Beta Release Criteria. The idea
> is to set a "criteria"
> to have Beta images with Updates Testing enabled by default. Note, we *do*
> this and have been doing this for s
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 08:40:47AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 09:21 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:26:07PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:19 PM Ian Laurie wrote:
> > > >
> &
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:26:07PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:19 PM Ian Laurie wrote:
> >
> > Performing kernel regression tests:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_kernel_regression
> >
> > I am getting errors submitting as follows:
> >
> > Your l
Could it be something like
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/registration-difficulties-on-chat-fedoraproject-org/39072/52
TLDR: matrix is supposed to show you a 'agreement' thing when you first
login to accept, somehow for this other user it got in a weird state
where they were not able to ac
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 08:21:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade.
>
> The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current
> configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a
> stable Fedora release with
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 08:18:07AM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Hello
>
>
> This has been silent for a long time now but here's the update.
> Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0].
> We DO care about not just the rpm but also the OCI image that we ship
> with
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 10:34:41AM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote:
> On 2/17/23 09:20, Ian Laurie wrote:
> > On 2/17/23 04:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Can you file a xfce4-session bug?
> >
> > No problem, here it is:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:04:05AM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote:
> In Rawhide (fc39) and the beta branch (fc38), with all updates applied, I'm
> seeing all menu icons are gone in Xfce... both the system menu and
> right-click context menus.
>
> Seems the Settings Tab in Settings->Appearance now has all
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:23:13PM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
>
> Yep. Lovely. Getting Microsoft and Google to fix this should be easy (ok,
> not really).
I read somewhere that google has already updated things internally, it's
just going thru some process to publish. (I can't recall where off
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:41:47AM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've been unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38. Example attempts:
>
> $ sudo rpm --import https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub
> [sudo] password for scott:
> error: Certificate
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says:
>
> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> existing OS X installation, install and configure a bootloader that will
> boot Fedora."
> https:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:17:22PM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote:
> In testing and playing with Rawhide 20221217.n.0 I found I was unable to
> install the 3rd party program bcompare (Beyond Compare) for which I am
> licensed.
>
> With their repo installed "sudo dnf install bcompare" produces the error:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:11:43PM -0700, Scott Beamer wrote:
>
> One thing I should mention, I checked and only 14 of the 37 extensions that
> can be installed from the Fedora repos are compatible with GNOME 43. So if
> Fedora 37 shipped today, I know of 23 packages that would be broken from th
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 03:50:02PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
>
> I can think of I guess four options:
>
> 1. Broaden the definition of the "critical path" somehow. We could just
> write in that it includes FreeIPA functionality, I guess, though that
> seems special purpose. We coul
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 12:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi folks!
> ...
> > I think doing this could really help us keep Rawhide solid and avoid
> > introducing major compose-breaking bugs, at minimal cost. But it's a
> > sign
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 03:22:38PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> This is related to bug 2003253 [1]. As reported in comment 1, our current
> "Keyboard layout configuration" criterion [2] specifies where the
> configured keyboard layout must be honored. It doesn't specify the initial
> setup utility,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:35:29AM -, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> Certain pages on https://fedoraproject.org/ are not accessible today.
> Eg.
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
> Communicate -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help?rd=Communicate
>
> I came ac
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:08:36AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:49 AM Igor Raits
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a
> > ~month) I can't get Wayland working on my laptop anymore. I've tried to
> > downgr
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 01:25:50AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> I had an idea and if instead of calling it stable, we call it RC1
> (release candidate 1) and only after adding all the updates in the base
> version and (re) testing, we finally call it Fedora 34 stable ?
Yeah, we could add a few
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:47:39AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 11:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Hey folks.
> >
> > I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of upgrades after a
> > release
> > is 'go' but before it&#
Hey folks.
I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of upgrades after a release
is 'go' but before it's actually released. We hit at least two issues I
am aware of with f34 due to multilib. ;(
first:
pipewire.i686 is in the base x86_64 repo and users had/have it installed.
pipewire.i68
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:08:15AM +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
>
> On 3/22/21 10:44 AM, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> > It's two hours later, but I am also in Germany and my full daily upgrade
> > (sudo dnf upgrade --refresh) went through fine.
> >
> > Maybe try again and/or with "--refresh"?
> Hi
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:11:26PM +, Jan K wrote:
> As far as I know there is some work being done on that server, so maintenance
> by infra team
Yeah, sorry, it would have been down for about 2 minutes.
I was trying to fix something on it and had to stop the webserver.
You must have
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:13:45AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> In the wake of the BZ 1924808[1] discussion in Thursday's Go/No-Go
> meeting[2], I am proposing an addition to the Basic Release
> Criteria[3]. This would go into Post-Install Requirements -> Expected
> installed system boot behavior ->
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via test wrote:
>
> Kevin,
>
> Thanks for submitting those PRs. Do you have a sense of when the
> scripts will actually be updated and the older files flushed?
The scripts are updated now, but rawhide compose failed today
(due to x
Just a heads up for anyone running rawhide and using swapfiles: There's
some nasty corruption in 5.12-rc1. ;(
https://lwn.net/Articles/848265/ has details.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproj
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 08:53:10PM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via test wrote:
> Not sure if anyone here can address this minor problem, but here goes.
> For more than a week The top-level Fedora development repository at
> //dl.fedoraproject.org/fedora-linux-development/34 and /rawhide haven't
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:17:59PM -0600, David wrote:
> At this present state of Fedora 34 and Rawhide,
>
> I see almost the same exact packages getting the same bumps in version
> numbers, with only
> the suffix "fc34" and fc35" being the difference.
>
> 1 )Does this just mean that the ide
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 03:54:53PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:41:13PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > The image has been synced to
> > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/official-respins/ and the future
> > images will be available in the same location. If in case you
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 02:10:47PM +0100, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think there's a misunderstanding in how all the "frameworks" and stacked
> > on top of each other. I'm not very knowledgeable in this area, but I think
> > the layers are more or less like this:
> >
> > 6. Totem | Firefox
ote:
> > On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 07:33 -0700, James Szinger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800
> > > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> > > > will stop wor
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 02:01:22PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Just another heads up for folks.
>
> The glib2-2.67.1 update (in the rawhide thats composing right now) seems
> to cause gdm to crash here. Downgrading to 2.67.0 everything is working
> again.
>
>
Just another heads up for folks.
The glib2-2.67.1 update (in the rawhide thats composing right now) seems
to cause gdm to crash here. Downgrading to 2.67.0 everything is working
again.
I've filed:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2273
on it.
Rawhide users may want to exclude it or
If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to
remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss).
For now, downgrade nss or avoid updating to it until things can get
sorted out.
https://bugzil
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:02:41AM +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded this system after running "dnf upgrade". At the invitation to
> login screen I type in any userid and hit enter. I get a message about
> "corefile" and "segfault" and "glib_2" which QUICKLY disappe
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:53:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
>
> There were bug reports already that I hadn't found as I was looking for
> glibc bugs:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905667
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905964
>
> so, skip fprintd
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:04:51PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
...snip...
> I'd much rather see something like:
>
>
> Bug details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875677
>
> The bug seems to have been proposed as a blocker/freeze exception in
> [comment 13](https://bugzilla.redhat
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 08:29:52PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Sometimes the ticket titles were not very informative, but thats more
> > the fault of the bug really.
> >
>
> Well, we can easily add e.g. the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hello,
> some of you used the Blockerbugs discussion tickets during the F33 cycle.
> I'd love to have your feedback on that functionality.
>
> As a refresher, those discussion tickets are available from the Blockerbugs
> website [1] af
Greetings.
FESCo is looking to update the updates policy document that is here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
For the most part the updates are not changing any policy, but simply
removing old/no longer accurate information (taskotron no longer exists,
bodhi is alway
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 08:16:58PM -0500, David wrote:
> My install of Rawhide went smoothly today.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/yg08wi8f9abckg1/Photo%20Oct%2003%2C%208%2008%2045%20PM.jpg?dl=0
>
>
> I see a stable rpm 4.16 replaced the rc-version.Is that a major
> milestone ?
> Does that me
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:03:29PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
> > "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
> &
Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their
"QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org.
Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as:
"The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is unconfirmed,
and for verifying the fix once the bug has been resolved."
Ho
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:05:09PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I'd like to clarify some of our criteria which only refer to HTTP and don't
> mention HTTPS. In particular:
>
> "When using a release-blocking dedicated installer image, the installer
> must be able to use either HTTP or FTP repositori
Sad news indeed. ;(
He will be missed...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fe
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:17:29PM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> what about kernel-5.7.5-200.fc32 in Koji? Since yesterday, it seems to be in
> building process.
> Anybody knows when one can expect the building completion?
It's done. It got stuck on a ppc64le builder that had it's k
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:17:27AM +0200, Jaap Bosman wrote:
> Hello
>
> today servers are being moved?
>
> cannot read
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-and-using-a-live-installation-image/index.html
> and other docs.
>
> will wait until all is clear.
It was an issue
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:56:33AM -0500, David wrote:
> It looks or appears to me that many if not all packages in Rawhide are
> slightly
> more recent versions that the ones available via flatpak.I know some
> flatpaks
> also offer a choice of a nightly version.
>
> I was just wondering or p
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 06:52:05PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
...snip...
> * Testcase_dualboot_with_macOS -- Our old Mac Mini stayed in the office, so
> we can't evaluate this one. OTOH, our tests decrease in value every cycle,
> because our Mac is archaic and doesn't even contain the latest OS vers
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 01:44:19PM -0500, David wrote:
> Stan,
>
> I am just trying to become as familiar with possible and to try to
> understand why Xfce fans still cling to Xfce.
Why?
I agree that Xfce is definitely not for everyone, but what works for
some may not work for others. :)
Anyho
> I can't find the ticket where I went nuts about this before any more,
> but I've been saying it for a while :P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435423
You can blame me, because I said I would work on fixing it,
then never did. ;(
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:42:16AM -0500, David wrote:
> Disclaimer: I am a novice, for the purposes of this
> report.
We all learn every day, if we are lucky. :)
>
> Today's Rawhide update went smoothly.I am now on the
> third iteration of kernel 5.6.0-rc2.
>
> I explored the settings
On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 12:28:41PM -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
...snip...
> Question: Is this an okay thing to do? I asked this once before in the
> context of a particular bug and the recommendation was that I should send an
> e'mail to the assignee. I just want to determine if this is a g
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 01:29:40PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> We've talked about replacing blocker bug review meetings with something
> else for a long time. The meeting has an upside of a higher communication
> bandwidth, but also a downside of requiring participants to be available at
> the same
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 06:05:34PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> In the upcoming Fedora 32, is Firefox defaulting to DNS over HTTPS (RFC
> 8484)?
No.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751410#c2
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On 9/19/19 12:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 11:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 11:11 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On 9/18/19 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the record, it makes me sa
On 9/18/19 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> For the record, it makes me sad that we don't have a good way to know
> whether we're in Beta or Final phase, and also that the canonical
I was sad about this too, and we needed it in various places in ansible,
so I made:
https://infrastructure.fedora
Just a stabl in the dark: In the past, network-scripts (subpackage if
initscripts) was getting pulled in by dependencies, and I think some of
these got fixed this last week or so.
So, if you were using network-scripts for your network, and it's not
installed anymore, install that? Or switch to Net
On 4/12/19 8:18 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Would you guys please consider going back to Xfce 4.12
> in Fedora 30? Xfce 4.13 is just too buggy!
Well, this is likely a topic for the fedora xfce list, not the test list.
That said, I don't really see that happening... there are some bugs
On 4/8/19 3:25 PM, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
>
> The page https://getfedora.org/workstation/prerelease/ mentions using the
> fedora media writer to write ISOs to USB drives.
>
> It says you can download it using dnf, but it does not give the package name.
>
> The package name is "mediawriter".
On 4/1/19 10:37 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> I have been lurking at the last few QA meetings, but I must still be
> missing something. I followed all the reference pages people were kind
> enough to send me. I have Hex Chat set up and I registered at the
> website. In fact when I re-did the r
On 12/21/18 11:55 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> Recently I have been doing some testing on the Rawhide drops. I didn't
> find any new problems to talk about so far. Just for note, I have not
> tested any of the drops where the e'mail called out gating failures.
>
> Since this is my first time
On 10/12/18 3:27 PM, Michael Erwin wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I Saw the same thing as well in every one of my F29 environments, however it
> seems to be a script issue, if you rerun the upgrade, the problem for me
> didn’t reappear.
This is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637496
it'
On 10/9/18 2:46 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Am I the only one who's worried that the f29 buildroot is broken right
> now, on the day of the final freeze?
>
> It looks like unbound was updated with an soname bump yesterday. This
> buildroot override for f29 is breaking a lot of things right now
On 07/09/2018 02:37 PM, George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to use yum-deprecated but am getting a screwy message "Error:
> Invalid version flag: or".
>
>
> Somewhere in the bowels of yum-deprecated one of the python programs is
> having trouble maybe? Can we get someone to fix that p
On 03/21/2018 05:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I know this isn't strictly a "test" question. But I think maybe more folks
> with
> greater insight my be lurking here.
>
> In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the user's list it was finally
> determined
> that if one erased "grubby" the kerne
Hey stan.
I ran into this same issue here. It seems it's caused by
environment-modules. There's a bug on it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539856
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test
On 08/25/2017 09:41 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Hi, guys.
>
> I don't know if this is the correct forum for this, but over on the
> users' list people have been talking about the fact there haven't been
> any delta RPMs released for F26 updates. For those of us who don't have
> download limits, this
On 08/19/2017 02:15 PM, Bowen Wang wrote:
> Hi,
> I am currently upgrade my rawhide, it seems I need to import a GPG key. I
> looked
> in the directory /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/, but I couldn't find keys for fedora 28,
> where can I get GPG key for fedora 28? Thanks.
It's in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-
On 07/29/2017 06:44 AM, George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to keep my Fedora 27 (Rawhide) system up to date by running "dnf
> upgrade" at least daily. For the past week I have seen a list of packages
> with broken dependencies. 165 in number. dnf --best reports 118 or so
> "problems".
On 06/19/2017 11:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 06:15 +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote:
>> Missing expected images:
>>
>> Workstation live i386
>> Kde live x86_64
>> Workstation live x86_64
>> Kde live i386
>
> Indeed that's a problem, I'll look into it...
Turns out to be a pun
Greetings.
Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide
composes in a while (13 days as of today).
This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now
failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items.
Here's a partial list:
2017-0
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:24:29 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Russel Winder
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 12:10 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 11:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> […]
> >> > You can always just pull
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:40:05 +
Russel Winder wrote:
> Advice required…
>
> I have four installations of Rawhide. Three of them seem fine,
> consistent, and as expected: all packages except the kernel installed
> once and up to date – I keep multiple kernels for fairly obvious
> reasons.
>
>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:24:20 -0500
Dusty Mabe wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 09:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 17:25 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> >> Missing expected images:
> >>
> >> Atomic qcow2 x86_64
> >
> > There seems to be some sort of problem in pungi-make-
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:02:14 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
> Or this order:
>
> 1. Pick an image to test
> 2. Pick a test to run on the image
I do this. Usually because I am wanting to test a particular image I
care about like the cloud base or Xfce live. I also usually tend to
just
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:37:46 -0500
Bowen Wang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I haven't seen updates from Rawhide since Monday, does it stop rolling
> or frozen?
Nope, it's just been broken the last few days.
See
https://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2016/10/03/how-to-debug-fedora-rawhide-compose-probl
On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 12:10:58 -
"Zdenek Chmelar" wrote:
> Many thanks for your help.
> Would you be so kind and check Anitya
> (https://release-monitoring.org/) as well please? I added several
> projects there yesterday but the Telegraphist badge
> (https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/tele
On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:16:33 -
"Zdenek Chmelar" wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I would just like to kindly ask someone to check if my account
> (zdenek) works correctly on bodhi. Even if I added some karma these
> days, my bodhi profile page still says "Last bodhi-related activity:
> 2 years ago". M
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 14:14:36 -0500
Bowen Wang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I found the web page about how to upgrade the Rawhide to the newest
> version: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
>
> there are totally 4 commands
> 1. dnf upgrade --refresh
> 2. dnf install dnf-plugin-system-up
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:08:49 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hmm, sorry. Someone said this was the case on IRC, and I didn't
> actually check - I should have.
>
> Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. I'll
> come up with a separate proposal for that.
Note that the one c
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:48:39 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we
> became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already,
> but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to
> qa group moderators/spons
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:22:46 +0530
Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Hey , send a mail to accou...@fedoraproject.org . I will personally be
> checking this as we are onbaording new contributors . We would expect
> the system to not give out such errors which might make the newcomers
> interest to wither
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:21:55 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 16:27 +0300, Pavlo Rudyi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 16:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > Well the server is also open source, so sure, you could make a
> > > private
&
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:24:32 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 09:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Well, if you use https://meet.jit.si/ (Their hosted server) you
> > can use any web browser, it doesn't need any kind of dedicated
> > client.
>
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:26:38 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "RW" == Russel Winder writes:
>
> RW> From what I can see DRPMs for Rawhide have not been picked up by
> RW> the mirrors for quite a long time now.
>
> I don't believe drpms are generated for rawhide. I'm not sure they
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:17:22 +0300
Pavlo Rudyi wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 03:16 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2016-06-24 at 10:12 +0800, Dev wrote:
> > >
> > > I found opensource alternative - https://jitsi.org
> >
> > I found 2 rpm spec to build it on Fedora :
> > https://bui
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 08:58:29 -0600
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 01:14:16PM +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> > On current Fedora Rawhide It seems that GDM starts but then hangs as
> > there is no Xorg and no Xwayland. Is this other people's situation
> > or am I alone in seeing
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 02:48:34 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
> # rpm -qa | grep curl
> curl-7.49.1-2.fc25.i686 2016-06-03 12:07 297K
> libcurl-7.49.1-2.fc25.i6862016-06-03 12:07 273K
> python3-pycurl-7.43.0-3.fc25.i686 2016-04-14 08:44 240K
> python-pycurl-7.43.0-3.fc25.i686
On Thu, 26 May 2016 10:42:39 +0100
Russel Winder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Systemd is currently blocked from upgrading for me due to a problem
> with a samba dependency. Trying to remove the Samba dependency so as
> to do the upgrade indicates that gdm and much of GNOME Shell would be
> removed – clearly
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:27:29 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:08 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Friday, March 25, 2016 12:25:08 AM CDT cornel panceac wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Is there a Wayland live image available?
> > > If not, how can one be created?
> > > Co
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:15:49 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:54:30 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?page=22&releases=F24
> > >
> > > There are 22 pages of updates for F24 and push requests as old as
> > > 11 days. When will be t
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:43:51 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?page=22&releases=F24
>
> There are 22 pages of updates for F24 and push requests as old as
> 11 days. When will be the next push to "stable"?
As soon as Fedora 24 Alpha is signed off on, and ev
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:52:44 -0600
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:09:49AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> > I should be generated when you do a kernel install next.
>
> >
> > though I do wonder how my resuce
> > kernel from 2013 will do with a fedora 24 system
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:49:06 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> i.e. they're actually marked 'i386' and are in a directory called
> 'i386'.
>
> CCing Jan and nirik (who's shown as creating the page in the edit
> log).
Yeah, just missed/typo/mistake.
I have changed them to the i386 path and marked
1 - 100 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
