ode-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
I can't recall, but, is podman included in a release blocking package set
which container(s) should be runable, I'd think the criteria
should mirror the current virt criteria, e.g., self hosting, and as a
container-on-previous-release. I also reckon we should mirror the
virt criteria when it comes to a runtime, and '
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:31:05PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:37:34PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Are there hardware needs here? (Like, not in the server room but in QA
> > > team member's hands?)
> > pwhalen has hardware. Not sure who else does. I'm not going
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:16:05AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Another consideration would be whether we ought to also have aarch64
> support in Taskotron, if it's going to become a primary arch. I'm not
> actually sure if Taskotron currently covers 32-bit ARM, though, even.
Taskotron does n
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:14:23PM -0400, Brian Gribble wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> My name is Brian and I am a Platform Consultant at Red Hat. My current
> role is supporting a project using PKI along with other Red Hat products.
> Prior to joining Red Hat I worked as a Linux Systems Administrato
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:17:27AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, at the Alpha go/no-go we discussed this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437299
>
> and agreed that with current behaviour of anaconda and dnf, blocking
> Alpha release on it didn't make sense.
>
> The re
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:39:20PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> At the Go/No-Go meeting today, we agreed in principle that major bugs
> in virt guest functionality should come under the Alpha criteria, not
> the Beta criteria as before. When we established the virt criteria, use
>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 06:33:01PM +0100, Stanislav Zidek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Standa, a quality engineer from Red Hat, more specifically from BaseOS
> Security team where I mostly focus on testing crypto-related libraries and
> software (GnuTLS, NSS, OpenSSH and OpenSSL to name "our big four").
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:02:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! I've got a question for everyone who helps out with release
> validation testing. It's related to the project to build a new system
> for submitting those results. We have a ticket for designing that
> system:
>
> https:/
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 11:30:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> What do you think of the idea of directly contacting people who apply
> without sending a self-intro mail?
The only issue I can think of with that is you are potentially giving
your email to a spammer. Otherwise, I like it.
Jo
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 05:28:33PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well we're definitely out of scope now...but for some key personnel
> (people with admin access to key servers and so on), we actually do
> need as many contact methods as possible. If there's a massive hack or
> a huge security iss
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 08:59:02PM -0400, Rich Talmadge wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm interested and learning the process and ins and outs on the QA side of
> life. I have been using all kinds of Linux off and on.
>
> Lets see now a little quick blurb about me names Rich living on the east
> coast
> Subject: Re: Pungi 4 milestone builds: proposals
> From: adamw...@fedoraproject.org
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org; rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:33:41 -0800
>
> On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 13:26 -0500, John Dulaney wrote:
>> .
>>>
&
.
>
> == 2. N indicates TC/RC, R indicates number ==
>
> In this scheme, we'd build e.g. 'Alpha 1.1' (Alpha TC1), 'Alpha 1.2'
> (Alpha TC2), 'Alpha 2.1' (Alpha RC1), 'Alpha 2.2' (Alpha RC2).
>
> This seems like the closest possible way to map to our current system.
> Again it's a bit weird at Final
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:11:04 +0300
> Subject: Newbie in FedoraProject team
> From: fp.kar...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> Hi all!
>
> My name is Alexander Kolesnikov, I am from St. Petersburg, Russia. I
> use Linux about 6 years:
> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 21:16:40 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Introduction
> From: kahlil.wallac...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Kahlil Wallace
> mailto:kahlil.wallac...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:33 PM
> S
> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 04:27:58 -0400
> From: mrma...@earthlink.net
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: ?howto?: find needed package in not configured repository -> intel
> video driver
>
> My Google foo is getting me nowhere fast. I want to follow-up on
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/
>
> On this machine no. The kernel is 3.17.0-301.fc21.x86_64. This is the
> first time I install Fedora on it.
>
> I have another machine with "AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor
> 4800+" and have running QEMU-KVM virtualization on it since 2007 withou
> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:39:45 +0200
> From: jon.inga...@telia.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: ERROR: could not insert 'kvm_amd': Operation not supported
>
> I installed Fedora 21 Beta TC3 (used netinstall for server) on HP DC5850
> with virtualiation software (KVM). The proces
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:42:07 -0400
> From: kpa...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: problems with QA:Testcase_base_startup
>
> In the base installation matrix
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Alpha_RC1_Base#Test_Matrix
>
> we have this test case:
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> From: rdie...@math.unl.edu
> Subject: Re: Sound problems with skype in F21
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:46:53 -0500
>
> Temlakos wrote:
>
> > That suggests when I do the upgrade from F20->F21, I should use
> > pulseaudio with no latency. True?
>
> Do you even
> Subject: Re: Test case discovery / extraction (MozTrap)
> From: adamw...@fedoraproject.org
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:43:58 -0700
>
> On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 19:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hey, folks. So as part of the possible move to MozTrap (or, really
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:33:47 -0400
> From: r...@htt-consult.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: gnome desktop image for arm?
>
> I am looking at:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=appliance&order=-id
>
> And do not see a gnome image for f21 a
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:04:49 +
> From: johan...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Leaving the project
>
> Greetings yo all
>
> With regrets I must say I feel we have grown so fat we are about to
> collapse under our own weight but instead of properly start dealing wit
> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:38:39 -0700
> From: Chris Murphy
> To: Eric Sandeen
> Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org, Test Fedora
> , x...@oss.sgi.com
> Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] XFS on Fedora i686, armv7hl
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> On 2/26/14, 11:37 PM, Chris Mur
ail dot com
> Manager Quality Engineeringirc: eanxgeek
> rhce # 805007668329332rhcva # 805007668329332
>
Ahoy, and welcome to the club!
I kind of went the other way; recently I was hired by Red Hat GSS because I had
experience
with Fedora QA.
Thanks much,
John Dulan
I'm also +1 in general; Kamil does raise a good point
about the systemwide layout being available, but not
required to log in. The only thing that worries me is
it would be nice to ensure this works on desktop
managers besides GDM and KDM (ie, non-blocking
desktops).
John.
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:20:48 -0800
> From: crobe...@cintrixhosting.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Hello Everyone,
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am looking to help out the QA team with testing. Handsome Pirate has
> helped me learn the testing process with easy karma and h
I'm plus one for the rewrite as a whole, but also for leaving out
mention of proventestors and bugzappers, while keeping in the
information in those sections.
As for the tools section, while Tim is the obvious name to put in,
what about, say, Josef or Kamil?
John.
> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:52:16 +
> From: johan...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
>
> Purpose and a fact of being "elitist" group which caused more harm then
> good in the QA community and what I'm worried abo
Ahoy,
So, I am with Adam on this one (I'm not a mod?). I've been +1 for this
idea for quite some time now.
Johann, I've been around for a long time, even longer than Adam, and I don't
remember the original purpose for the QA group; I do vaguely recall James
Laska telling me it had some purpose o
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:58:41 +
> From: johan...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Who can close BZs?
>
>
> On 12/06/2013 03:56 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dne pátek, 6. prosince 2013 16:19:35 CEST, Clyde E. Kunkel napsal(a):
> >> Is there a policy
> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:28:46 +0200
> From: denni...@conversis.de
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Introduction
>
> On 05.09.2013 18:15, John Dulaney wrote:
>
> > RE the Raspberry Pi, alas, Fedroa does not support it; for one it's ARMv6
>
Alas, I rather doubt I'll be able to make it.
John.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:06:38 +0300
> Subject: Introduction
> From: shar.lilts...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm following the Intruduction email example writing this, hope you are
> having a good time reading it :)
> I've been using Fedora since Fe
> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 21:08:21 -0400
> Subject: Self-introduction: Olga Johnson
> From: olgajohnso...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to join Fedora QA Team.
> I'm Olga from Laurel, MD. I'm fairly new to QA field. I'm freelancing
> in Web
Wiki page at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130826
Fedora 20 Planning
TC1 done
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Alpha-TC1/
TC1 has landed (handsome_pirate,
15:07:15)non working ARM platforms as of today:
pandaboard, beaglebone black, trimslice (tflink,
1
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:10:19 +
> From: johan...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: F19 Final criteria revamp
>
> On 06/10/2013 07:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Well, let me put it more baldly: up till now I can't recall a
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:31:21 +
> From: johan...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Question regarding bug filing on gnome components
>
> On 04/29/2013 05:27 PM, Michael Knepher wrote:
> > I'm running Fedora 19 alpha, and have a question on the most appropriate
> >
Testers are needed for (1), included in RC2.
If y'all could get in this and post in the bug report
your findings, I'd appreciate it.
John.
(1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949912
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:39:40 -0700
> From: c...@omen.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
>
> I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker.
>
> KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute
> for Wine.
>
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:14:15 -0700
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Major criteria re-write / re-design proposal: Beta draft
>
> On 15/03/13 12:54 PM, John Dulaney wrote:
> >
> > One question: For the virt criter
One question: For the virt criterion, would it not be better to s/recommended
Fedora virtualization tools/supported Fedora virtualization tools? It seems to
me that by stating that only the recommended virt tools are supported, you
might as well be saying supported.
John.
The test list is not the place to post problems with proprietary software that
is not in the Fedora repos.
Further, it is well known that virtualbox eats kernels like candy. If you
trouble with that particular piece
of software, you brought it upon yourself for using crap and you deserve to
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:34:33 -0800
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Proposal: "automatic blockers"
>
> Hey, folks. So here's another proposal from an idea that was mentioned
> during the F18 cycle.
>
> There's a few types of blocker bug that are basica
> As two people voted for it, patch. Beta proposal is unchanged. For
> Alpha, instead of adding a new criterion, the existing criterion is
> simply modified to:
>
> * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary
> architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on
> Subject: yum -- Protected multilib versions?
> From: foxec...@wowway.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:05:45 -0400
>
> Can't seem to install .i686 and x86_64 versions of the same package.
>
> sudo yum install libxcb-1.8-2.fc17.i686 krb5-libs-1.10-5.fc17.i686
>
This has nothing to do with QA.
John.
From: geor...@spanmail.net
To: fedora-test-l...@redhat.com
Subject: is the name ok
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:24:24 -0400
There is no release criterion in the Testing/QA group for the release name.
Before millions see the latest great work from a multi
> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:37:38 -0300
> Subject: Re: Weird rawhide desktop behavior
> From: look...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a while,
> > thoug
Shiver me timbers!
It's time for another Beefy Test Day, Argh! Tomorrow, 13 March, is the USB 3.0
Test Day!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-13_USB_3.0
Testing is easy; just use your favourite up-to-date Fedora 17 image (Live or
Install); everything
is included! The testing wi
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:29:01 -0500
> From: clum...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Anaconda should be rewritten in a compiled language!
>
> > Just kidding ... sort of.
> >
> > I'm willing to bet that I wouldn't be getting a "NameError: global name
> > 'BRFSErro
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> From: robat...@fedoraproject.org
> Subject: test signed checksum files and torrents the same way ISOs are tested
> now?
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:46:14 +
>
> Currently, ISOs are posted in a temporary location, go through a
> test-fix-test-fix... cycle,
days, as
well as https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/SOP_Test_Day_management for helping
with creating the associated Wiki page and actually running the test day.
If you need any help, feel free to email me at jdula...@fedoraproject.org.
Thanks much
John Dulaney
(1) https
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:44:52 -0500
> From: kpa...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Release criteria proposal: downgrade some kickstart delivery
> methods from Beta to Final
>
> > On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 18:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Hey, folks. So, curre
> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 10:40:19 -0400
> From: dgbo...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Does RC5 - Fedora 16 gold?
>
> My question is. Since Fedora 16 RC5 was declared good does that mean
> that the ISO that will be released Nov 8 be a renamed RC5? Are they/will
> they be t
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:57:52 -0700
>
> So, that thing yesterday about RC4 being one last big push? I lied!
>
> We found two more blockers this morning, fixed 'em, and had our arms
> twisted at the go/no-go meeting to try and mak
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:06:10 -0400
> From: lmac...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: New proventester metrics
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:45:58AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 10:52 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> >
> > > Out of 23255 total
I'm for bumping up TC1
John.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:30:51 -0700
>
> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 23:44 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 4
> > (RC4) is now available for testing. Please see the follo
> Subject: Release criteria: virtualization tweak
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:20:20 -0700
> CC: pjo...@redhat.com
>
> Hey, all. pjones pointed out at a recent blocker review meeting that the
> Beta virt criterion:
>
> "The release must
> From: br...@wolff.to
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Should I make a tracking bug in fedora for problem reported upstream?
>
> I have reported https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41862 for an
> issue with 3.1 kernels crashing, typically on the order of hours after
> bootin
Subject: Re: Proposed Alpha criteria adjustments
From: jla...@redhat.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:56:38 -0400
>On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 21:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wr
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-07-25/fedora-qa.2011-07-25-14.59.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-07-25/fedora-qa.2011-07-25-14.59.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-07-25/fedor
> >
> > I have to admit that I find the idea of a meeting sop between perplexing
> > and amusing... if you want to meet, you meet. Are we really so
> > process-orientated that we can't perform the most basic things without a
> > 'sop' ?
>
> I think it is a handy checklist for someone running a mee
> We will to have add tests cases for checking whether the filesystem
> degrades gracefully when it is being filled up but design is not the
> scope of the test cases. We would trust the experts, in this case, the
> filesystem developers to take care of that.
To take care of the design, yes, b
Vita, I'll see if there is anyone at Southeast Linux Fest associated with xcfe
and lxde.
If so, I'll talk to them directly and report back here.
John
> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:37:13 -0400
> From: vhu...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal: Too similar applicat
> A nice start!
Thanks kindly
> If, later on, you also manage to include in subcases that would test the
> various new features of btrfs (as much as utilities present allow, that
> is...), I think the test case would be amazing - and essential, should we
> have btrfs in Fedora 16/17.
Indeed
I am working on a draft btrfs test case (1) under the assumption
that it will be default for F16. I'd appreciate any additions or
suggestions for addition. Note that it isn't finished yet, I'm just
done for the day.
John.
(1) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_btrfs
> That all said, question remains on what to actually do on this. In a
> long term I'd suggest trying advocate that there is a appropriate
> solution based in the upstream, might it be pop-ups (sounds reasonable
> to do for all the desktop environments) or something based on how KDE
> does it. Al
> This is a call for having a discussion on trying to establish some compromise
> - on what to put as a name in the desktop[1] file for corresponding
> applications around different Fedora desktops as well as among applications
> inside each of those. The goal is simply to avoid people being u
Your network issues with KDE are probably due to the change in
the Network Manager API, which caused all sorts of fuss.
> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:03:57 -0700
> From: c...@omen.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: F15: KDE To the Rescue
>
> After some experimentation I was able to
thing
I use. I wonder who maintains it (I'll look it up)? This is an app
that, because of Fluxbox and several other 'minority' desktops
that would be good to have for some time. I'm thinking that it should
be quite some time before we have to worry about NM API changes
again (at
orks fine standing
alone without
any other Gnome components loaded. Since it was included in my clean F15
install,
I assume that it is still available. I have had no functionality issues at all
with it.
John Dulaney
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorap
This thread should be preserved for all time, now.
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:35:46 -0500
> From: subscribed-li...@sterndata.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: hello
>
> On 05/24/2011 04:27 PM, test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > hello!
> >
> > My name is Kate,
It has been my understanding that anyone from QA that's present (it happened
I was the only one present for F14 final) can cast the vote (which I did, +1).
If I was wrong in this, then maybe F14 shouldn't have shipped?
I do think that having the meeting as a failsafe is a good idea.
> Hey, all.
rwise
> I'll do another one a bit after the release to pick up the LXDE change.
I know that SoaS will be changed here shortly. It will happen sooner if I can
get off my butt and get some work done.
John Dulaney
j_dulaney
--
te
> Check if you actually have the repo enabled, then.
Not enabled. Don't know what's going on here.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Obviously, that package is not the issue on my system. rpm -e says it is
not installed.
yum.log shows nothing. I'm going to experiment some, but I'm not hopeful.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorap
> Too specific. Just do:
>
> sudo yum remove yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info
That got me the same result.
John.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I am having a similar problem:
This is what happened when I tried to remove
yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info-1.1.30-2.fc15.noarch
[jdulaney@jdulaney ~]$ sudo yum remove
yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info-1.1.30-2.fc15.noarch
[sudo] password for jdulaney:
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, re
> * A system logging infrastructure must be available and enabled by
> default. It must provide at least basic local file-based logging of
> kernel messages, and allow other components to write log messages. This
> must be done in accordance with relevant standards accepted by the
> Project
+1
ere.
John Dulaney
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I had tried to attend, but internets went down just before the meeting started.
J. H. Dulaney
> Subject: Re: Fedora 14 Beta Readiness
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:00:43 -0700
>
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 12:45
32 bit version, downloaded yesterday.
J. H. Dulaney
> Subject: Re: F14B RC3 Boot Failure
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:00:07 +0100
>
> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:24 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
> > List:
> >
List:
I attempted to boot from the LiveCD, and on every box I've tried, I've received
the same error, RHB #636380. I've burned the ISO twice, and have checked the
checksum, so I do not believe that the problem is a download/burn error.
James, I'll go with that. I find it confusing if I have F13 and F14 on the
same box, and if the wrong artwork is used, it may get confusing.
Subject: Release criteria proposal: fedora release artwork
From: jla...@redhat.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:49:55 -0400
Adam,
I will be available.
> Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting August 19,
> 2010 @ 12:00 AM UTC
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:36:46 -0700
>
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:59 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >
ad to send it over my network. Annoying, but workable.
Further information will be in the bug report.
John Dulaney
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I vote yes to both Beta and Alpha proposals.
> Subject: Release criteria proposal: boot to console
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:19:30 -0700
>
> Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria proposals came out of today's
> go/no-go meetin
I agree to both. In some instances, if you boot the liveCD and you don't
have vesa available, then you won't be able to get to the install bit, as
I well know
John Dulaney
> Subject: Release criteria proposal: basic graphics mode boot
> From: awill...@redha
Why would we have to make it submit reports now? Unless the steps needed to
implement this are very few, there are plenty of other things that have a higher
priority right now, no?
John Dulaney
> Subject: Release criteria proposal: automated bug checking tools functionality
> From:
Either that, or include a recomended procedure with package discription?
Easily automatable, me thinks.
John Dulaney, great grandson of Arthur Sr.
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:34:40 -0400
> From: boblf...@gmail.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Proven tester spe
Good idea, me thinks.
> Subject: Proven tester special testing procedures: PackageKit?
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:01:36 -0700
>
> We've talked about special proven testers testing procedures for
> kernels, and now another candidate
German and
French
versions, although there shouldn't be enough difference there to matter in
terms of breaking stuff.
John Dulaney (jdulaney or j_dulaney), grandson of Arthur.
> Subject: Re: L10N QA Template for F14
> From: r...@redhat.com
> To: igorsoa...@gmail.com; nor...@fedorapro
At the appropriate points, will we be able to download complete ISOs for each
desktop, ready to rock and roll?
j_dulaney
> Subject: Desktop validation testing expansion
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: x...@lists.fedoraproject.org; l...@lists.fedoraproject.org;
> k...@lists.fedoraproject.org;
I am wondering, how hard would it be to modify Bodhi to require extra Karma for
kernels? Who should I talk to about this possibility?
John, Son of Clay.
> Subject: Re: Proven tester wiki love
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:16:47 -0700
>
I'd say only those interested in being mentors.
Dulaney
> Subject: Re: ProvenTesters Sponsorship
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:16:56 -0700
>
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:47 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > Hel
All: My only comment is that it seems that #2 would certainly lengthen meeting
times. I myself don't object to this as I do not currently have a job, but one
of these days that may impede my ability to make said meetings.
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:47:21 -0500
> Subject: ProvenTesters Sponsors
I like it
J. H. Dulaney
> From: dafr...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 19:33:35 -0500
> Subject: Proven tester wiki love
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> I went to work a bit on jdulaney's fork of the proven tester page to
> make the mentorship-merging stuff
I ran through the same thing back when I wrote my own operating system.
Getting the keyboard to work properly was, in my opinion, the hardest part. Of
course, I cheated and used Linux's memory management... I think some Russian
keyboards do give out different signals, but don't quote me on t
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
