Background
--
Every release since possibly the dawn of time (or, at least, [Fedora
Core 5][1]), we make a [Common Bugs page][2] on the wiki. This is where
we document things that we judge not to be blockers but are concerned
many people might run into on upgrade or first install of a new F
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 106/206 (x86_64), 62/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not faile
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, 11:40 Kamil Paral wrote:
> I'm not sure if you understood it correctly (or if I even expressed it
> correctly). The operations are of course executed sequentially, always
> (that's how our package managers work). But they can be *scheduled*
> concurrently, i.e. you can instal
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:12 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> "Multiple operations" is one of the reasons for proposing this criterion. In
> this release, and previous releases, we often had a bug that you can install
> a package, but then you can't remove it. But if you restarted the package
> manager
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211103.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211104.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 114
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 33.23 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 5:15 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:32 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
>> ~~
>> The default graphical package manager for a given software type must
>> appropriately:
>> * install, remove and update software, even if multiple operations are
>> sc
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 4:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 7:32 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > * install, remove and update software, even if multiple operations are
> scheduled sequentially or concurrently
>
> I don't like the "multiple operations" part but to be honest I'm not
>
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:48 PM Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> On 11/3/21 6:31 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> During the F35 release cycle, there was a dissatisfaction that we use the
> "basic functionality" criterion [1] too broadly when discussing package
> manager issues (like multiple issues in plasma-d
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211103.0):
ID: 1051516 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211103.0):
ID: 1051384 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211103.0):
ID: 1051368 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
11 matches
Mail list logo
