On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 12:13 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 15:22 -0300, Beatriz Michelson Reichert wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > Thank you so much for replying, it helped a lot!
>
> No problem! I'm aware this is all a bit complicated and sometimes I
> struggle to actually writ
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 6:54 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> 197 of these in the non-working instance
>
> 08:18:38,802 WARNING
> org.fedoraproject.Anaconda.Modules.Storage:WARNING:blivet:device/model
> is not a valid attribute
>
> 2 in the working instance. Seems suspicious.
>
> OK so I'm finding that
The following Fedora 33 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
71 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c3d587d52c
shim-15.4-1
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bf2458347f
glibc-2.32-7.fc33
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-24
197 of these in the non-working instance
08:18:38,802 WARNING
org.fedoraproject.Anaconda.Modules.Storage:WARNING:blivet:device/model
is not a valid attribute
2 in the working instance. Seems suspicious.
OK so I'm finding that Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210620.0.x86_64.raw was
created in a UEFI VM, h
From the rawhide x86_64 cloud base log:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/Fedora-Cloud-Base/Rawhide/20210620.n.0/data/logs/image/oz-x86_64.log
08:19:56,227 WARNING
org.fedoraproject.Anaconda.Modules.Storage:INFO:program:Running in
chroot '/mnt/sysroot'... grub2-install --no-f
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 6:21 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/912650
>
> Does openqa only do qcow2 tests? I'm not seeing raw tests. I'm just
> curious for another data point. :P
>
> I'm seeing Rawhide and 33 images passing (couple warn, no fail). And
> on 34 only x
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/912650
Does openqa only do qcow2 tests? I'm not seeing raw tests. I'm just
curious for another data point. :P
I'm seeing Rawhide and 33 images passing (couple warn, no fail). And
on 34 only x86_64 fail, but all of them fail and they're all failing
at the fir
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 15:22 -0300, Beatriz Michelson Reichert wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Thank you so much for replying, it helped a lot!
No problem! I'm aware this is all a bit complicated and sometimes I
struggle to actually write it all out clearly even if I know
(or...think I "know" :P) how it wo
Hi Adam,
Thank you so much for replying, it helped a lot!
--
Best regards,
Beatriz
Santa Catarina State University - UDESC
Em dom., 20 de jun. de 2021 às 03:45, Adam Williamson <
adamw...@fedoraproject.org> escreveu:
> On Sat, 2021-06-19 at 13:53 -0300, Beatriz Michelson Reichert wrote:
> >
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/134 (aarch64), 15/199 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210619.0):
ID: 913018 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/913018
ID: 913027 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210619.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210620.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210619.0):
ID: 912645 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/912645
ID: 912646 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qc
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210619.0):
ID: 912635 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
14 matches
Mail list logo
