Re: Questions about the testing process

On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 15:03 -0300, Beatriz Michelson Reichert wrote: > Hi, I'm Beatriz and I'm a student at the Santa Catarina State University. Hi Beatriz! Glad to help out. > > Currently, I'm studying the Fedora Release Life Cycle, and would like to > know if anyone could help me with some que

Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)

On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 13:56 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 1:50:57 PM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2021-06-16 10:08 a.m., Garry T. Williams wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 12:46:06 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 up

Questions about the testing process

Hi, I'm Beatriz and I'm a student at the Santa Catarina State University. Currently, I'm studying the Fedora Release Life Cycle, and would like to know if anyone could help me with some questions about this subject: 1. Is the Fedora CI infrastructure ( https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/

Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)

On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 1:50:57 PM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2021-06-16 10:08 a.m., Garry T. Williams wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 12:46:06 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can > >> push it stable ASAP: > >> > >> http

Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)

On 2021-06-16 10:08 a.m., Garry T. Williams wrote: On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 12:46:06 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can push it stable ASAP: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7b1dc57fe The above update removes

Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)

On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 12:46:06 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can > push it stable ASAP: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7b1dc57fe > > aom was recently updated in F34 and Rawhide (the update for F33 is

Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)

Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can push it stable ASAP: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7b1dc57fe aom was recently updated in F34 and Rawhide (the update for F33 is pending), and the new version of libaom depends on jpegxl-libs...which, it tur

Fedora-IoT-35-20210616.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210613.0): ID: 909778 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/909778 ID: 909779 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os

Fedora-Rawhide-20210616.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 27/134 (aarch64), 22/198 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210616.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210615.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210616.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 33 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.48 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-IoT-34-20210616.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210610.0): ID: 909339 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/909339 ID: 909340 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210616.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210615.0): ID: 909368 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/909368 ID: 909369 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-

Re: Mentor/Sponsor please

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:40 PM Barry Griffin wrote: > Hey Lukas, > > Thank you for the reply! > > On my welcome ticket on Pagure, there is a link to How to be a > successful contributor > > > There is a section ab

Re: Mentor/Sponsor please

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:15 AM Barry Griffin wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking for a mentor/sponsor to help and guide me to becoming a > successful and regular contributor to the Fedora QA team. > > I can contribute at least one hour per day to the Fedora Project but am > unsure what to do at t

Re: Mentor/Sponsor please

Hey Lukas, Thank you for the reply! On my welcome ticket on Pagure, there is a link to How to be a successful contributor There is a section about "Find a mentor or sponsor" With Sumantro, I did a Kernel test on

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210616.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210615.0): ID: 909322 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Introduction - Max R.

Hello Max, you can join to take part in release validation testing, for example https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_35_Rawhide_20210615.n.1_Desktop?rd=Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test . By doing this: - you will be extremely helpful as there is a lot of tests to be tested reg

Re: Mentor/Sponsor please

Hello, I am not sure what you mean by a "sponsos" but if it means you have someone to ask questions, then you can ask me anytime. Could you perhaps make clear what test process you have been lead through by sumantro? Have you seen the test matrices for release validation tests? If not, this is a