No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
17 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 78/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedo
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200310.0):
ID: 542281 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200309.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200311.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 13
Added packages: 34
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 261
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 303.16 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200309.n.0):
ID: 538025 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/538025
ID: 538051 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 15:25 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:49 AM Felix Miata wrote:
>
> > From Adam's description I thought no modules were supposed to get reset,
> > and I
> > don't know what module dwm is about.
> >
>
> The reverse. All modules are getting reset during
This is concerning firewall-applet. I see that firewalld and the
firewall applet are based at https://firewalld.org, but it has been
suggeted that gnome is the problem area for why firewall applet won't
work under gnome but works fine under xfce.
Reference:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:49 AM Felix Miata wrote:
> From Adam's description I thought no modules were supposed to get reset,
> and I
> don't know what module dwm is about.
>
The reverse. All modules are getting reset during upgrade, that's intended.
_
> Sorry for the delay on this, but I have updated[1] the Release
> Blocking wiki page[2] to include the IoT blocking images as I
> understand them. If I have misunderstood, please let me know.
That looks fine to me, Paul can you please double check.
> [1]
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?
Samuel Sieb composed on 2020-03-11 00:41 (UTC-0700):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> I tried pulling the 31 to 32 trigger, but see this:
>> ...
>> vim-minimal
>> Resetting modules:
>> dwm
>> Transaction summary
>> ...
>> Install 19
>> Upgrade 1169
>> Downgrade33
>> Tot
On 3/11/20 12:28 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
I tried pulling the 31 to 32 trigger, but see this:
...
vim-minimal
Resetting modules:
dwm
Transaction summary
...
Install 19
Upgrade 1169
Downgrade 33
Total download size: 909M
DNF will only download...
That looks fine to me,
Adam Williamson composed on 2020-03-10 17:15 (UTC-0700):
> So we have F30 and F31 updates that need testing:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-02ee4b1a1c (F30)
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-717d521d35 (F31)
> These are intended to fix problems when upg
13 matches
Mail list logo
