Re: Blocker bug process proposal: make FESCo blockers automatic

On 07/10/2014 03:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! So, we have this Alpha release criterion: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs it was added back in 2013 - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-June/116531.html - to provide a

Re: Rawhide users: ceph packaging issues

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 15:36:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but it'd be best if the packages

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 258 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 70 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 59 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 70 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20 50 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6551/chicken-4.8.0.6-2.fc20 48 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6615/dru

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On 2014-07-10 14:39 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: mirrormanager was still sorting itself out, as of about two minutes ago nirik (Kevin Fenzi) says it should be sorted. so, just try again. maybe it might take some time for all mirrors to have the file straight, so if you still hit the prob

Re: empty .bash_history

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:08 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > I've a system that's just started zeroing out .bash_history at every reboot > since last week. Is this huge annoyance happening to everyone? Intended? It happened to me once for my root account, but doesn't seem to be happening every reboot,

Re: Rawhide users: ceph packaging issues

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages > manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but > it'd be best if the packages were fixed up, and I figured I'd let folks > know about the pr

Rawhide users: ceph packaging issues

I just thought it'd be good to alert Fedora 21 and 22 users to this issue. Some major changes were introduced to the 'ceph' package in the 0.81.0-3 build, and maintained in the 0.81.0-4 build. These builds were done for all current releases, but not submitted as updates to any stable release, so l

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:26 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > File /var/cache/yum/x86_64/21/fedora/metalink.xml does not exist > Could not parse metalink > https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-21&arch=x86_64 error > was > No repomd file > > > /var/cache/yum/x86_64/21/rawhide contai

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On 2014-07-10 13:33 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 04:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> ISTR many times in the past having trouble turning onto the fork instead of >> keeping on Rawhide, and solving the dilemma with something along the lines >> of: >> # rpm -e --node

Re: Blocker bug process proposal: make FESCo blockers automatic

On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:54:02 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! So, we have this Alpha release criterion: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs > > it was added back in 2013 - > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-June/11653

empty .bash_history

I've a system that's just started zeroing out .bash_history at every reboot since last week. Is this huge annoyance happening to everyone? Intended? -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Lin

Re: mount -t nfs delayed

On 2014-05-29 13:20 (GMT-0700) Felix Miata composed: > On 2014-05-29 11:29 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: >> On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 12:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> On 2014-05-29 09:08 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: >>> > On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 00:48 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >

Blocker bug process proposal: make FESCo blockers automatic

Hi folks! So, we have this Alpha release criterion: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs it was added back in 2013 - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-June/116531.html - to provide a documented process by which FESCo could designate

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 04:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2014-07-10 01:03 (GMT+0700) Adam Williamson composed: > > > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 03:48 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> On 2014-07-09 23:37 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: > > >>> 'fedora-repos-rawhide' package (that replaced fedor

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 10:16 +0200, František Zatloukal wrote: > Rawhide wiki page should be updated, because: > > *Q:* How do I get out of Rawhide again? I want to continue on the branch > leading to the next release. > > A: Remove the [image: Package-x-generic-16.png] >

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:37:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: sudo yum-config-manager --enable fedora and, optionally, enable updates-testing: sudo yum-config-manager --enable updates-testing The updates-testing repo isn't there yet. I am hoping we get empty repos created for both update

F-21 Branched report: 20140710 changes

Compose started at Thu Jul 10 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On 2014-07-10 01:03 (GMT+0700) Adam Williamson composed: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 03:48 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: On 2014-07-09 23:37 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: 'fedora-repos-rawhide' package (that replaced fedora-release-rawhide # yum remove fedora-release-rawhide Er. I said

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

Rawhide wiki page should be updated, because: *Q:* How do I get out of Rawhide again? I want to continue on the branch leading to the next release. A: Remove the [image: Package-x-generic-16.png] fedora-release-rawhide

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 03:48 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2014-07-09 23:37 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: > > > Hey folks! As we just hit a branch point, here's a refresher on what > > this means for folks who've been running Rawhide. > > > If you want to keep running Rawhide, which will n

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On 2014-07-09 23:37 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: Hey folks! As we just hit a branch point, here's a refresher on what this means for folks who've been running Rawhide. If you want to keep running Rawhide, which will now contain packages tracked for Fedora *22*, you don't need to do an

Re: 2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Mike Ruckman wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:07:12 +0400 > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >> Hi, >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman >> wrote: >> > # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 >> > # Date: 2014-07-09 >> > # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) >> > # Loc