On 07/10/2014 03:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! So, we have this Alpha release criterion:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs
it was added back in 2013 -
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-June/116531.html -
to provide a documented process by which FESCo could designate bugs as
blocking the release. Practically, FESCo has always been able to do
this, but we didn't used to have a way of keeping track of it.
It occurs to me that there's really no reason for FESCo-designated
blockers to go through the review process: there's really nothing to be
discussed, if FESCo says "we designate this bug as a blocker", then it's
a blocker. We don't need to propose and review it. So I suggest we
should amend the Automatic Blockers policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers
with this additional bullet:
* Bugs designated as release blockers by FESCo (see [[{{FedoraVersion|
long|next}}_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs]])
does this make sense to you all? Thanks!
Makes sense. Make it so.
--
Dan Mossor, RHCSA
Systems Engineer at Large
Fedora QA Team | Fedora KDE SIG | Fedora Server SIG
Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice
FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx
San Antonio, Texas, USA
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
