Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/17/2013 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: FWIW, I didn't do any debugging. I did experience slowness but my goal was to install since my DVD download got corrupted (my fault). Once installed and Guest Additions installed all works fine. I cannot run any application, including anaconda. Perh

Re: Screen Saver?

On 04/18/2013 01:36 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 04/18/13 08:31, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On 17/04/13 05:00 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> I've been doing most of my testing by installing from the DVD to a VBox VM. >>> Today I decided to try the Live Desktop. I walked away from the process >>> and w

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 17/04/13 10:53 PM, Joerg Lechner wrote: Hi, " Fedora-Live-LXDE-i686-19-Alpha-1.iso 17-Apr-2013 02:24 709M ", this build seems to be the same code as the last build(s). Successful boot not p

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

Hi, " Fedora-Live-LXDE-i686-19-Alpha-1.iso17-Apr-2013 02:24 709M ", this build seems to be the same code as the last build(s). Successful boot not possible on a Samsung X22 laptop. Kind Regards Joerg -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: Andre Robatino An: test-announce Versch

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

Hi On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Red Hat bugzilla seems to be acting up. I will file a review request when > that problem is fixed > Done https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384 Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: h

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/17/2013 08:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/18/13 11:15, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 04/17/2013 09:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Try 4.2.10. I saw someone somewhere mention that 4.2.12 was crazy slow but 4.2.10 worked fine. Same behavior with 4.2.10. I can boot into the console ("3" on

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > unarchiver is supposed to have a free software implementation that is > capable of extracting RAR3 format. It isn't packaged for Fedora yet. > > https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/free-rarv3-extraction > > Someone should do that and ge

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/18/13 11:15, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 04/17/2013 09:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> Try 4.2.10. I saw someone somewhere mention that 4.2.12 was crazy slow >> but 4.2.10 worked fine. > > Same behavior with 4.2.10. > > I can boot into the console ("3" on kernel cmdline) and CD access

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

Hi On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > We can't use the code because it isn't free. It has use restrictions. > Someone would have to write an unrar from scratch with a free license for > it to get into Fedora. > unarchiver is supposed to have a free software implementatio

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/17/2013 09:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Try 4.2.10. I saw someone somewhere mention that 4.2.12 was crazy slow but 4.2.10 worked fine. Same behavior with 4.2.10. I can boot into the console ("3" on kernel cmdline) and CD access stops and nothing uses any CPU. It seems X related, but I

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 17/04/13 06:54 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Is there a trick to getting F19 and VirtualBox to play nice? Host: Fedora 18 x86_64 VBox 4.2.12 3ghz quad core When I load the latest F19 Alpha LiveCD ISO it takes about 5 minutes just to get to the desktop. Once there, the CD access never stops,

F19 alpha and VirtualBox

Is there a trick to getting F19 and VirtualBox to play nice? Host: Fedora 18 x86_64 VBox 4.2.12 3ghz quad core When I load the latest F19 Alpha LiveCD ISO it takes about 5 minutes just to get to the desktop. Once there, the CD access never stops, and a CPU core is always 100%. My clicks take a

Re: Screen Saver?

On 04/18/13 08:31, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 17/04/13 05:00 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> I've been doing most of my testing by installing from the DVD to a VBox VM. >> Today I decided to try the Live Desktop. I walked away from the process and >> was a bit surprised to find it in "screen saver" m

Re: Screen Saver?

On 17/04/13 05:00 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: I've been doing most of my testing by installing from the DVD to a VBox VM. Today I decided to try the Live Desktop. I walked away from the process and was a bit surprised to find it in "screen saver" mode when I got back. Screen was Black, but return

Screen Saver?

I've been doing most of my testing by installing from the DVD to a VBox VM. Today I decided to try the Live Desktop. I walked away from the process and was a bit surprised to find it in "screen saver" mode when I got back. Screen was Black, but returned to show the clock when the mouse was mo

Fedora 19 Alpha status, karma requests

Hi folks! So, good news: following the blocker review meeting this morning, we're looking quite close to signing off on Alpha. We just need to fill out the RC4 test matrices before tomorrow's go/no-go meeting, and hope we don't find any more blocker bugs. Of course, if you do, please nominate

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2, Thursday, April 18 @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19 Alpha. Thursday, April 18, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine

F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #8 Minutes

= #fedora-blocker-review: f19alpha-blocker-review-8 = Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-04-17/f19alpha-blocker-review-8.2013-04-17-16.00.html Minutes (text): http:/

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

On 04/17/13 15:54, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > Both 32 and 64 bit Alphas made successful installs > from USB drive installing GNOME plus C dev. > > 64 bit version segfaults on NFS mounts but the mounts succeed. > > 32 bit version still refuses NFS mounts. IMO a broken NFS should > be a b

New fpaste update could do with some testing

Hi folks, I've just pushed a fpaste update with a few enhancements. I've personally tested it quite a bit, but it could always do with more testing before we push to stable. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpaste-0.3.7.1-8.fc19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpaste-0.3.7.1-8.fc1

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3). As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedoraho

F-19 Branched report: 20130417 changes

Compose started at Wed Apr 17 09:15:22 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=

rawhide report: 20130417 changes

Compose started at Wed Apr 17 08:15:37 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [amide] amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit

Re: Cursor moves to bottom-right after logging in in GDM

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Ozan Çağlayan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:32 PM, drago01 wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Ozan Çağlayan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't remember seeing this on F18 with gnome 3.6. After entering my >>> password and clicking Enter in GDM for log

Re: Cursor moves to bottom-right after logging in in GDM

> Probably because the old upper-left corner behavior was more annoying, in > that it brought up the Activities overview after logging in instead of your > desktop. Hm but why doesn't it stay in the center and moves to another point? -- Ozan Çağlayan Research Assistant Galatasaray University - C

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

Both 32 and 64 bit Alphas made successful installs from USB drive installing GNOME plus C dev. 64 bit version segfaults on NFS mounts but the mounts succeed. 32 bit version still refuses NFS mounts. IMO a broken NFS should be a blocker. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.