"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) said:
> On 09/06/2012 01:02 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) said:
> >>On 09/06/2012 09:40 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >>>Johann, I don't really understand your point. The term 'default package
> >>>set' no longer
On 2012-09-06 6:54, Kamil Paral wrote:
Hi,
we should amend the beta criterion:
'At the package installation stage, the install should show no
uncategorized package groups'
There should be something like 'Software selection spoke' instead of
'package installation stage', also I'm not sure if 'u
On 2012-09-06 0:58, Petr Schindler wrote:
Hi,
I think that require LVM and encryption in alpha phase is quite too
early. It isn't feature which should slow down the alpha release. I
propose to demand it in beta phase. So I propose to change alpha
criterion:
'The installer must be able to comple
On 2012-09-06 0:59, Kamil Paral wrote:
Hi,
Because of changes in package set selection in new anaconda, I
propose
to amend the alpha criterion:
'The installer must be able to complete package installation with
the
default package set for each supported installation method'
to:
'The installe
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:28 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 04:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> The design of the new UI isn't a step-through wizard like the old one, but
>> hub-and-spoke: there is no 'next' exactly, as there's no set order for the
>> spokes. You can do them
On 09/06/2012 04:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The design of the new UI isn't a step-through wizard like the old one,
but hub-and-spoke: there is no 'next' exactly, as there's no set order
for the spokes. You can do them in any order. What 'back' really means
is 'back to the hub'. I agree this
On 09/06/2012 12:14 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
> meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Alpha.
>
> As previously announced last week, we moved Go/No-Go two hours earlier.
>
> Thursday, September 06,
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Alpha.
As previously announced last week, we moved Go/No-Go two hours earlier.
Thursday, September 06, 2012 @21:00 UTC (15:00 EDT/21:00 CEST)
"Before each public
On 09/06/2012 06:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-09-06 1:03, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi F18 testers,
>>
>> some general issues concerning all F18 test candidates:
>>
>> 1. Selecting the different options seems not to be
>>comprehensible for Fedora newcomers: Why to press "back" for
>>
On 2012-09-06 1:03, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi F18 testers,
some general issues concerning all F18 test candidates:
1. Selecting the different options seems not to be
comprehensible for Fedora newcomers: Why to press "back" for
selecting the next options (for example, after have done the
k
On 09/06/2012 01:02 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) said:
On 09/06/2012 09:40 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Johann, I don't really understand your point. The term 'default package set' no
longer exists in Fedora 18.
Unless yum "groups" have been removed in F1
I downloaded the 64 bit TC6 ISOs. The DVD image checksum failed.
The netinstall CD could not find a repository to load from.
The DVD installed a Gnome desktop, but the resultant Fedora
refuses to start a graphical desktop.
I was finally able to install a Gnome desktop using pxeboot et al.
The fi
> I currently maintain my local mirror with rsync:
> /usr/bin/rsync -av --delete --progress --stats \
> mirrors.kernel.org::fedora/development/18/x86_64/os /z/fc18
>
> Is this the best place to rsync from to get up to date Fedora 18?
> If not, where?
Hello,
you may find the informatio
> Hi,
>
> we should amend the beta criterion:
>
> 'At the package installation stage, the install should show no
> uncategorized package groups'
>
> There should be something like 'Software selection spoke' instead of
> 'package installation stage', also I'm not sure if 'uncategorized
> package
I currently maintain my local mirror with rsync:
/usr/bin/rsync -av --delete --progress --stats \
mirrors.kernel.org::fedora/development/18/x86_64/os /z/fc18
Is this the best place to rsync from to get up to date Fedora 18?
If not, where?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.c
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) said:
> On 09/06/2012 09:40 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >Johann, I don't really understand your point. The term 'default package set'
> >no longer exists in Fedora 18.
> >
>
> Unless yum "groups" have been removed in F18 I dont see how the term
> "defaul
DVD also seems to be missing packages, xorg-x11-server-Xorg
(and possibly related). X server is not installed when desktop
manager is selected (tested GNOME and KDE).
Martin
- Original Message -
> From: "Jaroslav Reznik"
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 6,
> Thanks for the explanation. In my case, there is only one other
> localization (my native language) which I'm using in parallel
> with English (US). Sometimes it's very funny to read mixed
> message strings in some apps like Disk Manager or sealert, so
> I thought I could participate and at last
Seems like lives are missing a few packages available on TC5 -
chrony causes 854899, also rsync is reported to be missing.
R.
- Original Message -
> As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 6
> (TC6)
> is now available for testing. Content information, including ch
Hi F18 testers,
I was able to install F18/TC8 into VirtualBox using
Fedora-18-Alpha-TC6-x86_64-netinst.iso. The installed OS is operable.
Additionally, I made some issues you can read in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854881
(Title:Improvement suggestions for all F18 test candidates)
On 09/06/2012 09:40 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Johann, I don't really understand your point. The term 'default package set' no
longer exists in Fedora 18.
Unless yum "groups" have been removed in F18 I dont see how the term
"default package set" can no longer exist and no longer apply...
JBG
-
> > To be as broad as possible is nice, but for now, there is nothing
> > like
> > 'default package set', you have to choose some, so the amending of
> > this
> > criterion is necessary.
>
> No it's not.
Johann, I don't really understand your point. The term 'default package set' no
longer exist
On 09/06/2012 09:01 AM, Petr Schindler wrote:
The good reason for this change is that we need to test our blocking
desktops (Gnome, KDE), so it would be nice if anaconda could install
them in alpha. We don't need any minimal system or web server. For the
start we just need a working desktop for t
> On 09/06/2012 10:15 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >> Hi F18 testers,
> >>
> >> some general issues concerning all F18 test candidates:
> >>
> >> 1. Selecting the different options seems not to be
> >>comprehensible for Fedora newcomers: Why to press "back" for
> >>selecting the next options (f
On Čt, 2012-09-06 at 08:45 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 07:21 AM, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > Please, let me know if you have some suggestions or objections.
>
> Please keep it
>
> 'The installer must be able to complete package installation with the
> default package set f
Hi,
we should amend the beta criterion:
'At the package installation stage, the install should show no
uncategorized package groups'
There should be something like 'Software selection spoke' instead of
'package installation stage', also I'm not sure if 'uncategorized
package groups' makes sense.
On 09/06/2012 07:21 AM, Petr Schindler wrote:
Please, let me know if you have some suggestions or objections.
Please keep it
'The installer must be able to complete package installation with the
default package set for each supported installation method'
We are try to be as broad as possible
> Hi F18 testers,
>
> some general issues concerning all F18 test candidates:
>
> 1. Selecting the different options seems not to be
>comprehensible for Fedora newcomers: Why to press "back" for
>selecting the next options (for example, after have done the
>keyboard
>selection I w
On 05.09.2012 19:07, A S Alam wrote:
> ਬੁੱਧਵਾਰ 05 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2012 03:48 ਸ਼ਾਮ ਨੂੰ, Mateusz Marzantowicz ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
>> Is there a single place for reporting translation issues in Fedora 18 or
>> should I contact each project separately?
>
>
> 1) if there are many issues specific to a language, it can be re
> Hi,
>
> I think that require LVM and encryption in alpha phase is quite too
> early. It isn't feature which should slow down the alpha release. I
> propose to demand it in beta phase. So I propose to change alpha
> criterion:
>
> 'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
Hi F18 testers,
some general issues concerning all F18 test candidates:
1. Selecting the different options seems not to be
comprehensible for Fedora newcomers: Why to press "back" for
selecting the next options (for example, after have done the keyboard
selection I want to select the tim
> Hi,
>
> Because of changes in package set selection in new anaconda, I
> propose
> to amend the alpha criterion:
>
> 'The installer must be able to complete package installation with the
> default package set for each supported installation method'
>
> to:
>
> 'The installer must be able to i
Hi,
I think that require LVM and encryption in alpha phase is quite too
early. It isn't feature which should slow down the alpha release. I
propose to demand it in beta phase. So I propose to change alpha
criterion:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the entire
disk, ex
Hi,
Because of changes in package set selection in new anaconda, I propose
to amend the alpha criterion:
'The installer must be able to complete package installation with the
default package set for each supported installation method'
to:
'The installer must be able to install the default deskt
34 matches
Mail list logo
