#301: Translations Testing Day Proposal
---+---
Reporter: pycrash | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:11
. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
ISOs) and testin
-warlock-0.4.0-2.fc17
vfrnav-20120831-1.fc17
xine-ui-0.99.7-2.fc17
xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.6.2-2.fc17
Details about builds:
389-ds-base-1.2.11.12-1.fc17 (FEDORA-2012-13088)
389 Directory Server (base
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12367/keepalived-1.2.3-2.fc16
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12979/seamonkey-2.12-1.fc16
10
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.12 for Testing. This release includes support for
POSIX attributes in Windows Sync, several bug fixes, and cleanup of
various issues found by valgrind and Coverity. The 389 team would like
to thank Carsten Grzemba fo
Actually, never mind about the error in the first screen. That was my
mistake.
However, disk encryption does not seem to happen. It unchecks
automatically - no error message displayed!
On 08/31/2012 02:14 PM, Nonamedotc wrote:
Is disk encryption supposed to work with alpha TC4?
It lets me
Is disk encryption supposed to work with alpha TC4?
It lets me choose "Encrypt" option but does not ask for password. Then,
the main screen shows error - "Error checking storage configuration".
--
--
nonamedotc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.
On 2012-08-31 5:22, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
TC4 x86_64 has the same problem as the last 2 DVD downloads.
It stalls at "Installing Filesystem (4/1031)". As before, top(1)
shows
anaconda hogging the CPU.
This is on an AMD 6000 with ECS motherboard with 2GB RAM.
As Kamil linked, th
#313: Sub-Blockers are not detected as proposed or accepted blockers
--+
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Miles
-1.02-1.fc18
pptp-1.7.2-17.fc18
pungi-2.12-1.fc18
python-vcstools-0.1.21-1.20120828hg0fba0588.fc18
telepathy-glib-0.19.8-1.fc18
vfrnav-20120831-1.fc18
Details about builds:
389-ds-base-1.2.11.12-1
#311: Bug #847644 does not show up as a proposed blocker in the new blocker
tracker
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: critical
> TC4 x86_64 has the same problem as the last 2 DVD downloads.
> It stalls at "Installing Filesystem (4/1031)". As before, top(1)
> shows
> anaconda hogging the CPU.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853405
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin
TC4 x86_64 has the same problem as the last 2 DVD downloads.
It stalls at "Installing Filesystem (4/1031)". As before, top(1) shows
anaconda hogging the CPU.
This is on an AMD 6000 with ECS motherboard with 2GB RAM.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of I
> Can the Blocker and NTH bug links be posted on the corresponding
> blockerbugs page? Having to open an arbitrary bug and traverse
> through
> the Blocks: field seems unnatural, plus it's possible that there may
> not
> be any bugs to traverse (for example when the Blocker and NTH bugs
> are
> fir
On 08/31/2012 06:30 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> On 08/31/2012 03:57 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>>
>>> Do you think it's a good idea to add also a link to our new blocker
>>> bugs page [1] to the announcement, or is there way too many links
>>> already?
>>>
>>> Kamil
>>>
>>> [1] http://qa.fedoraproject.or
> On 08/31/2012 03:57 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> > Do you think it's a good idea to add also a link to our new blocker
> > bugs page [1] to the announcement, or is there way too many links
> > already?
> >
> > Kamil
> >
> > [1] http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/
>
> How about adding the f
On 08/31/2012 03:57 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Do you think it's a good idea to add also a link to our new blocker bugs page
> [1] to the announcement, or is there way too many links already?
>
> Kamil
>
> [1] http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/
How about adding the following? (Changed for
> As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 4
> (TC4)
> is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
> can be found at
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:9 .
> Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
> ISO
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:9 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
19 matches
Mail list logo
