On 08/31/2012 06:30 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> On 08/31/2012 03:57 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> >>> Do you think it's a good idea to add also a link to our new blocker >>> bugs page [1] to the announcement, or is there way too many links >>> already? >>> >>> Kamil >>> >>> [1] http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ >> >> How about adding the following? (Changed for each milestone, of >> course.) >> >> Fedora 18 Alpha Blockers >> http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/18/alpha > > If we include this, I think we can remove links to Blocker and NTH tracker > bugs in Bugzilla (you can always find that by opening any bug listed there > and traverse through the Blocks: field). > > Also please note that > http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current > always points to the currently active milestone. The drawback is that there > is no clear way how to switch milestones. There are some improvements from > Tim Flink on their way that should solve this. Currently I would either use > /current or just the top-level link.
Can the Blocker and NTH bug links be posted on the corresponding blockerbugs page? Having to open an arbitrary bug and traverse through the Blocks: field seems unnatural, plus it's possible that there may not be any bugs to traverse (for example when the Blocker and NTH bugs are first created).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
