Re: Unable to boot Fedora 15 Alpha.

2011-03-31 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 31.3.2011 23:36, Vamsi Krishna Brahmajosyula napsal(a): > please add "selinux=0" as kernel parameter while booting. In earlier > cases relabeling worked for me. I haven't tried with the most recent > update yet. Please don't spread bad advice! The correct parameter is enforcing=0. If anybody

Re: F15 BETA.TC1 experiences

2011-03-31 Thread Christoph Frieben
X still gets locked up when resuming from suspend for a Radeon X800 based upon the R430 chip and using the R300 Gallium driver. There is a corresponding bug report (643700) but there has been no activity for half a year after this issue had shown up for the first time under F14 whereas everything w

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 03/31/2011 10:40 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >> On 03/31/2011 07:51 PM, cornel panceac wrote: >>> >>> >>> 2011/3/31 Scott Robbinsmailto:scot...@nyc.rr.com>> >>> >>> >>> Yet another reason setting grub's timeout to 0 was a very bad idea, >>> es

Re: Screensaver

2011-03-31 Thread Mike Chambers
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 18:18 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > On 03/31/2011 06:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 04/01/2011 04:37 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > >> I've done a clean install of F15 alpha and so far, so good. How do I > >> get the screensaver configured? gnome-screensaver is configured, but

Re: Screensaver

2011-03-31 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 04/01/2011 04:48 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > Can't say I'm really happy with Gnome 3. I can't find out how to set > default fonts, too. It's not quite ready yet. For changing the font settings, install gnome-tweak-tool Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: Screensaver

2011-03-31 Thread Steven Stern
On 03/31/2011 06:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/01/2011 04:37 AM, Steven Stern wrote: >> I've done a clean install of F15 alpha and so far, so good. How do I >> get the screensaver configured? gnome-screensaver is configured, but I >> don't see anything for it in the power app or in the cont

Re: Screensaver

2011-03-31 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 04/01/2011 04:37 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > I've done a clean install of F15 alpha and so far, so good. How do I > get the screensaver configured? gnome-screensaver is configured, but I > don't see anything for it in the power app or in the control center. There isn't any UI to configure. Ther

Screensaver

2011-03-31 Thread Steven Stern
I've done a clean install of F15 alpha and so far, so good. How do I get the screensaver configured? gnome-screensaver is configured, but I don't see anything for it in the power app or in the control center. -- -- Steve -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https:

Re: Unable to boot Fedora 15 Alpha.

2011-03-31 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 04/01/2011 03:17 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > Just saw that before this message another message reported: > > Starting ABRT Automated Bug Reporting Tool failed, see 'systemctl status > abrtd.service' for details. Boot with enforcing=0. Two different but related bugs https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Re: Unable to boot Fedora 15 Alpha.

2011-03-31 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 31/03/11 23:29, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > I have few minutes ago (21:25 UTC) updated F15 Alpha and after a reboot the > boot > process stopped with the message: > > Stopping systemd Syslog Kernel Log Buffer Bridge... > > And the boot process did not proceed from here. > Has anyone seen this also?

Re: Unable to boot Fedora 15 Alpha.

2011-03-31 Thread Vamsi Krishna Brahmajosyula
I am not sure about the exact problem but mostly the issue has been incorrect selinux contexts with the new updates. please add "selinux=0" as kernel parameter while booting. In earlier cases relabeling worked for me. I haven't tried with the most recent update yet. thanks - vamsi On Fri, Apr 1,

Unable to boot Fedora 15 Alpha.

2011-03-31 Thread Erik P. Olsen
I have few minutes ago (21:25 UTC) updated F15 Alpha and after a reboot the boot process stopped with the message: Stopping systemd Syslog Kernel Log Buffer Bridge... And the boot process did not proceed from here. Has anyone seen this also? And what can I do to repair the system? -- Erik --

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Adam Pribyl
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 03/31/2011 07:51 PM, cornel panceac wrote: >> >> >> 2011/3/31 Scott Robbins mailto:scot...@nyc.rr.com>> >> >> >> Yet another reason setting grub's timeout to 0 was a very bad idea, >> especially in VMs. >> >> >> indeed, i had to boot another

Re: This is spam.

2011-03-31 Thread Chris W Tucker
SPAM On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Joe wrote: > http://www.flambeauant.nl/catalog//images/myblog.html > > > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

[no subject]

2011-03-31 Thread Joe
http://www.flambeauant.nl/catalog//images/myblog.html -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 31 marca 2011 18:26 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh napisał: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/31/2011 12:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> W dniu 31 marca 2011 18:18 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh >> napisał: >> [..] >>> Well if you don't have /etc/selinux/config then boot

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Scott Robbins
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:51:43PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote: > > > Yet another reason setting grub's timeout to 0 was a very bad idea, > especially in VMs. > > > indeed, i had to boot another operating system to increase the timeout so that > i can change the kernel line when needed.

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 03/31/2011 07:51 PM, cornel panceac wrote: > > > 2011/3/31 Scott Robbins mailto:scot...@nyc.rr.com>> > > > Yet another reason setting grub's timeout to 0 was a very bad idea, > especially in VMs. > > > indeed, i had to boot another operating system to increase the timeout > so that i can

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2011-03-31 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvirt-0.8.2-3.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-12.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2011-03-31 Thread updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvirt-0.8.3-6.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.2.4-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/loggerhead-1.18.1-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraprojec

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/31/2011 12:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > W dniu 31 marca 2011 18:18 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh > napisał: > [..] >> Well if you don't have /etc/selinux/config then booting without >> selinux=0 will cause the system to crash. If you want to d

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread cornel panceac
2011/3/31 Scott Robbins > > Yet another reason setting grub's timeout to 0 was a very bad idea, > especially in VMs. > indeed, i had to boot another operating system to increase the timeout so that i can change the kernel line when needed -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Joachim Backes
On 03/31/2011 06:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58:22 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: I thought that enforcing=0 was considered a better option, no, as it avoided relabling. (I would be grateful if someone can either confirm or correct that statement.) Yes, enforcing

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 31 marca 2011 18:18 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh napisał: [..] > Well if you don't have /etc/selinux/config then booting without > selinux=0 will cause the system to crash.  If you want to disable > SELinux you need to tell the system by settingup /etc/selinux/config. > > If the system is blow

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31/03/11 18:09, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 03/31/2011 05:50 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> W dniu 31 marca 2011 17:39 użytkownik Joachim Backes >> napisał: >>> On 03/31/2011 05:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, 2011/3/31 Mat

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/31/2011 12:14 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > W dniu 31 marca 2011 18:09 użytkownik Joachim Backes > napisał: >> On 03/31/2011 05:50 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> >>> W dniu 31 marca 2011 17:39 użytkownik Joachim Backes >>> napisał: >>>

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 31 marca 2011 18:09 użytkownik Joachim Backes napisał: > On 03/31/2011 05:50 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> >> W dniu 31 marca 2011 17:39 użytkownik Joachim Backes >>  napisał: >>> >>> On 03/31/2011 05:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, 2011/3/31 Matthias Runge: >

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/31/2011 09:58 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > Yet another reason setting grub's timeout to 0 was a very bad idea, > especially in VMs. virt-rescue (part of libguestfs) is very handy for changing the grub timeout of an offline VM. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682 Libvirt v

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58:22 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > I thought that enforcing=0 was considered a better option, no, as it > avoided relabling. (I would be grateful if someone can either confirm > or correct that statement.) Yes, enforcing=0 is a better temporary workaround than selin

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Joachim Backes
On 03/31/2011 05:50 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: W dniu 31 marca 2011 17:39 użytkownik Joachim Backes napisał: On 03/31/2011 05:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, 2011/3/31 Matthias Runge: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, the subject says all: Since systemd(?) updat

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Scott Robbins
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:39:41PM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 03/31/2011 05:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > >Hi, > > > >>the subject says all: > >>Since systemd(?) update an hour ago, my test system does not boot any > >>more. removing "rhgb quiet" from kernel command line shows > >>Failed

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 31 marca 2011 17:39 użytkownik Joachim Backes napisał: > On 03/31/2011 05:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> 2011/3/31 Matthias Runge: >>> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> the subject says all: >>> Since systemd(?) update an hour ago,

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Joachim Backes
On 03/31/2011 05:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, 2011/3/31 Matthias Runge: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, the subject says all: Since systemd(?) update an hour ago, my test system does not boot any more. removing "rhgb quiet" from kernel command line shows Failed to

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/3/31 Matthias Runge : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > the subject says all: > Since systemd(?) update an hour ago, my test system does not boot any > more. removing "rhgb quiet" from kernel command line shows > Failed to load SELINUX policy > Failed to set

since last update system does not boot any more

2011-03-31 Thread Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, the subject says all: Since systemd(?) update an hour ago, my test system does not boot any more. removing "rhgb quiet" from kernel command line shows Failed to load SELINUX policy Failed to set security context... for /run: invalid argument Fa

Re: A lot of SElinux error messages during boot after update to systemd-systemd-21-2.fc15.x86_64

2011-03-31 Thread cornel panceac
2011/3/31 Daniel J Walsh > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/31/2011 10:15 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > > Hi all, > > after having updated to the most recent packages (including update to > > systemd-21-2.fc15.x86_64), I got a lot of SElinux error messages during > > boot:

Re: update to gnome-shell-2.91.93-3.fc15 resets the activities bar to the system defaults

2011-03-31 Thread Brian Pepple
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi, > > after updating to gnome-shell-2.91.93-3.fc15, my activities bar on the > desktop was reset to the system default so I lost all own entries. This was actually done in 2.91.93-1, and the change was noted in the update details. https:

Re: A lot of SElinux error messages during boot after update to systemd-systemd-21-2.fc15.x86_64

2011-03-31 Thread Joachim Backes
On 03/31/2011 04:16 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/31/2011 10:15 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi all, after having updated to the most recent packages (including update to systemd-21-2.fc15.x86_64), I got a lot of SElinux error messages during boot:

update to gnome-shell-2.91.93-3.fc15 resets the activities bar to the system defaults

2011-03-31 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, after updating to gnome-shell-2.91.93-3.fc15, my activities bar on the desktop was reset to the system default so I lost all own entries. Somebody had this effect too? Kind regards -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signa

Re: A lot of SElinux error messages during boot after update to systemd-systemd-21-2.fc15.x86_64

2011-03-31 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/31/2011 10:15 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi all, > after having updated to the most recent packages (including update to > systemd-21-2.fc15.x86_64), I got a lot of SElinux error messages during > boot: > > Failed to load SElinux policy > Faile

A lot of SElinux error messages during boot after update to systemd-systemd-21-2.fc15.x86_64

2011-03-31 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi all, after having updated to the most recent packages (including update to systemd-21-2.fc15.x86_64), I got a lot of SElinux error messages during boot: Failed to load SElinux policy Failed to set security context system_u:object_r:sysfs_t:s0 for /sys: Invalid argument Failed to mount /sy

[Test-Announce] ABRT Retrace Server Test Day today (2011-03-31)

2011-03-31 Thread Kamil Paral
Fedora QA holds Test Day regarding ABRT 2 and Retrace Server on March 31: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-31_ABRT_Retrace_Server This test day will focus on Retrace Server feature [1] in Fedora 15 as well as ABRT 2.0. Refreshed and bright new test cases are prepared for your cons

ABRT Retrace Server Test Day on Thursday March (2011-03-31)

2011-03-31 Thread Michal Nowak
Fedora QA holds Test Day regarding ABRT 2 and Retrace Server on March 31: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-31_ABRT_Retrace_Server This test day will focus on Retrace Server feature [1] in Fedora 15 as well as ABRT 2.0. Refreshed and bright new test cases are prepared for your cons