On 03/31/2011 06:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58:22 -0400, Scott Robbins<scot...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:I thought that enforcing=0 was considered a better option, no, as it avoided relabling. (I would be grateful if someone can either confirm or correct that statement.)Yes, enforcing=0 is a better temporary workaround than selinux=0 because the latter will force a relabel.
I think this plays no role for me because *I* have SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config.
-- Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
