Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On 02/09/10 08:29, Rodd Clarkson wrote: >> Anyhow, what a waste of time all around. I spend a couple of painful hours >> booting and rebooting my system to try and isolate this bug and the >> developers couldn't take two minutes to mention that they needed to post the >> kernel and that they would

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

> Anyhow, what a waste of time all around. I spend a couple of painful hours > booting and rebooting my system to try and isolate this bug and the > developers couldn't take two minutes to mention that they needed to post the > kernel and that they would address my bug some time soon. > Anyhow, e

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > > My system suspends and resumes fine on f13 with the 2.6.33 kernels, so it > > isn't unreasonable to expect this functionality to continue on a stable > > release. > > On the ot

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On 02/09/10 03:58, Adam Williamson wrote: > Because there are always suspend issues, kernel team doesn't consider > suspend problems a blocker for release. This is really sad; just a few Fedora releases suspended and resumed fine right of the box on my T43 Thinkpad, F 13 belonged to them. I really

SOLVED: Re: firefox always starts offline

2010/9/2 cornel panceac > > > 2010/9/2 cornel panceac > > something strange happens on one of my test pcs running f14 (updated). >> firefox always starts in offline mode. i uncheck work offline and >> eevrythings fine until i close and start again firefox, when it's in offline >> mode again. wha

Re: firefox always starts offline

2010/9/2 cornel panceac > something strange happens on one of my test pcs running f14 (updated). > firefox always starts in offline mode. i uncheck work offline and > eevrythings fine until i close and start again firefox, when it's in offline > mode again. what could be the problem? NetworkManag

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:00 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Why was kernel-2.6.34.x pushed to updates in f13 when three people had >> > reported suspend is

firefox always starts offline

something strange happens on one of my test pcs running f14 (updated). firefox always starts in offline mode. i uncheck work offline and eevrythings fine until i close and start again firefox, when it's in offline mode again. what could be the problem? NetworkManager is stopped because it's not wor

Re: Suddenly no more sound in F14 - solved

On 09/02/2010 06:58 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: > What have you tried to rectify it? Not necessarily the yum update - do > you have pulseaudio is installed? Perhaps a gconf error > > On 09/02/2010 02:28 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> suddenly no more sound (after yum update on Sep 1, aftern

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 12:12 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > To be frank, they don't have time to look at everything, and suspend is > a bit of a way down the list. They are aware of your bug - I know > because one of the kernel team asked m

Re: Suddenly no more sound in F14

What have you tried to rectify it? Not necessarily the yum update - do you have pulseaudio is installed? Perhaps a gconf error On 09/02/2010 02:28 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, suddenly no more sound (after yum update on Sep 1, afternoon). Anybody else

Suddenly no more sound in F14

Hi, suddenly no more sound (after yum update on Sep 1, afternoon). Anybody else sees this? Sep 01 17:31:08 Installed: fedpkg-0.5.1.4-1.fc14.noarch Sep 01 17:32:12 Erased: fedora-packager Sep 01 17:32:12 Erased: fedpkg Sep 01 17:34:27 Updated: libgnome-keyring-2.31.91-1.fc14.i686 Sep 01 17:34:31 U

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 12:12 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > It is however, perfectly reasonable to expect that having tried a > kernel at the request of a fedora developer on fedora-test-list and > then having filed a bug against said kernel reporting problems, that > someone might actually have

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On 09/01/2010 09:12 PM, Rodd Clarkson wrote: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:00 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > Hi all,

Non-debug kernel

Hi everyone, I'm doing some F14 testing here with the latest NVidia beta driver. Have been rolling my own kernel thus far. Is there a sanctioned non-debug F14 kernel in koji or otherwise somewhere? cheers, Brendan -- test mailing list test@li

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:00 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Why was kernel-2.6.34.x pushed to updates in f13 when three people had > > reported suspend issues with the kernel and no attempt was made to > > address these issu

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:00 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > Hi all, > > Why was kernel-2.6.34.x pushed to updates in f13 when three people had > reported suspend issues with the kernel and no attempt was made to > address these issues. > > see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615560 >

Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

Hi all, Why was kernel-2.6.34.x pushed to updates in f13 when three people had reported suspend issues with the kernel and no attempt was made to address these issues. see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615560 I Rodd -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscrib

Re: F14 updates-debuginfo repo is missing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/31/10 9:47 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > The F14 updates-debuginfo repository appears to not exist. I get the > following error when I try to access it from my F14 VM: > > # yum --enablerepo=updates-debuginfo list kernel > updates-debuginfo/metali

Re: [Fedora QA] #112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/16

#112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/16 ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

Re: dkms package not available for F13

On 09/01/2010 11:00 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Rick Stevens wrote: >> Are there plans afoot to release a dkms package for F13? I ask because >> there seems to be none available for F13 although the database shows it >> as being approved. Should I simply force-install the F12 version in >> t

Re: [Fedora QA] #112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/16

#112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/16 ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

Re: dkms package not available for F13

Rick Stevens wrote: > Are there plans afoot to release a dkms package for F13? I ask because > there seems to be none available for F13 although the database shows it > as being approved. Should I simply force-install the F12 version in > the interim? A friendly reminder: This mailing list is fo

Re: dkms package not available for F13

> "RS" == Rick Stevens writes: RS> Are there plans afoot to release a dkms package for F13? "yum info dkms" indicates that a dkms package is available for F13. The fact that the release references "fc12" has no bearing on whether the package is available for F13. It simply did not need to

dkms package not available for F13

Are there plans afoot to release a dkms package for F13? I ask because there seems to be none available for F13 although the database shows it as being approved. Should I simply force-install the F12 version in the interim? -- -

Broken dependencies with Fedora 14 + updates-testing - 2010-09-01

== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Fixed packages compared with F-14 Branched report: ekg2 evolution-sharp fmt-ptrn gnome-c

Re: rawhide report: 20100901 changes

On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:20:34PM +, Rawhide Report wrote: > python3-PyQt4-4.7.4-2.fc14.i686 requires python(abi) = 0:3.1 > python3-PyQt4-4.7.4-2.fc14.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:3.1 > python3-PyQt4-devel-4.7.4-2.fc14.i686 requires python(abi) = 0:3.1 > python3-PyQt

_csrf_token (Re: Firefox out of date)

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 10:14 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-3.6.7-1.fc14,xulrunner-1.9.2.7-2.fc14?_csrf_token=d9a1b71eaac4e787200ef64fb8f8e819a5793074 Yay, now I can perform a CSRF attack on you if you still have that browser session open. Symfony s

Re: Firefox out of date

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:33:43PM -0400, David wrote: > The current Firefox 4.0 is beta 4 with beta 5 scheduled for release > (Tentative) Sept 6, 2010. > > The current stable release of Firefox is 3.6.8 with the release for > Firefox 3.6.9 also scheduled for release on Sept 7, 2010. > > The curr

rawhide report: 20100901 changes

Compose started at Wed Sep 1 08:15:32 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: [Fedora QA] #112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/16

#112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/16 ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

Re: [Fedora QA] #120: Proposed Test Day - Preupgrade - 2010-09-02

#120: Proposed Test Day - Preupgrade - 2010-09-02 ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Day |

Re: Firefox out of date

On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:33 -0400, David wrote: > The current Firefox 4.0 is beta 4 with beta 5 scheduled for release > (Tentative) Sept 6, 2010. > > The current stable release of Firefox is 3.6.8 with the release for > Firefox 3.6.9 also scheduled for release on Sept 7, 2010. > > The current ver

[Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day - Thursday 2010-09-02

Greetings, Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current Several problems have been reported when preupgrading to F-14 Alpha, this day we will focus on preupgrade[1] to summarize the issues. The tests were designed to cover general circumstances, incl

Re: python: symbol lookup error

> > after all the updates, the bug is still there, and i believe it's the same > bug as > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626852 > anyway, as joachim backes kindly suggested, yum downgrade at-spi2-atk fixed the problem, for now. -- Among the maxims on Lord Naoshige's wall, th

Re: python: symbol lookup error

2010/8/31 cornel panceac > 2010/8/31 Matthias Clasen > > >> Please check for updates first. There is already an update that fixes >> this. No need to file more bugs. >> >> >> i'll check tomorrow, at work. > > after all the updates, the bug is still there, and i believe it's the same bug as http