On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com>wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 12:12 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > To be frank, they don't have time to look at everything, and suspend is > a bit of a way down the list. They are aware of your bug - I know > because one of the kernel team asked me if I was aware of any problems > with 2.6.34 more serious than suspend issues, so obviously they've seen > yours, but haven't had time to respond to it yet. > > To be frank, I don't have time to test things at the request of developers if my test results are just going to be ignored. It's a lot of work to test stuff (as you would know) and no-one likes to be ignored. Even a simple not in the bug report saying that there was a compelling reason for upgrading the kernel to 2.6.34 that meant that the issue wouldn't be resolved and that I should make sure that I avoid updates if I require suspend/resume to work can't be too much pressure on a developer time - this of course assumes that there was a compelling reason and that it wasn't upgrades for the sake of upgrades in a stable product.) Might I ask what great good has come from this? Rodd
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
