On 08/17/2010 08:27 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:18:22AM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>
>> can somebody tell how to install libcamel-1.2.so.19?
>
> One way, as this is i386, would be
>
>yum install /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.so.19
yum install /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.s
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:18:22AM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
> can somebody tell how to install libcamel-1.2.so.19?
One way, as this is i386, would be
yum install /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.so.19
> I can't find it in
> updates-testing, and it's needed for nautilus-sendto:
>
> Error: Package
Hi,
can somebody tell how to install libcamel-1.2.so.19? I can't find it in
updates-testing, and it's needed for nautilus-sendto:
Error: Package: 1:nautilus-sendto-2.31.6-3.fc14.i686 (updates-testing)
Requires: libcamel-1.2.so.19
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 19:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria proposals came out of today's
> go/no-go meeting. I'll propose them formally for discussion and addition
> to the official criteria here.
As there was general agreement with both the 'boot to con
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote:
> Hello!
> Long time lurker, Fedora user since Core 1 or 2, can't remember for sure!
> Proud to say I have no Windows PCs on my property, nor will I allow any!
> My entire Family uses Fedora including my 6 and 8 year old, and have been
> for
Hi,
I'm Manuel Faux from Austria (Europe) and I would like to help Fedora's
BugZappers. I use Fedora since Fedora Core 6 on my desktop and also use
F13 on some servers. Fedora was the first distro i had contact with. I
tried several others, but came back to Fedora every time.
I am experienced
Attention proven testers!
mclasen informs me that a (very) big F14 GNOME update is awaiting proven
tester feedback:
http://tinyurl.com/25nacqc
Desktop team needs this update to go through before they can go ahead
and make refinements after the big changes. If F14-running proven
testers could ple
#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts
to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe
Type: defect| Status: reopened
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Horst H. von Brand
wrote:
> Joachim Backes wrote:
>
>> On 08/15/10 20:17, Rob Healey wrote:
>> > Greetings:
>> >
>> > Yes, I am having the same issues! I can't mount my USB drive either! I
>> > could using the live desktop dvd, but after update, no longer able!!
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Tom London
> > To: For testers of Fedora development releases <
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Sent: Sun, August 15, 2010 11:15:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: Not Authorized (can't mount USB fl
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20100816
= Attendees =
People present (lines said):
* jlaska (124)
* adamw (45)
* j_dulaney (34)
* maxamillion (29)
* nirik (18)
* fenris02 (16)
* kparal (14
#108: Proposed Test Day - Sugar on a Stick
---+
Reporter: sdz | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Day | Ver
Start End Name
Thu 12-Aug Thu 19-Aug Test Alpha Candidate
Thu 12-Aug Fri 20-Aug Prepare Alpha Release Notes (1 page)
Wed 18-Aug Wed 18-Aug Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting (17:00 EST)
Tue 24-Aug Tue 24-Aug Alpha Public Availability
Tue 24-Aug Wed 25-Aug NVR Update Check test
Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 08/15/10 20:17, Rob Healey wrote:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > Yes, I am having the same issues! I can't mount my USB drive either! I
> > could using the live desktop dvd, but after update, no longer able!!!
> >
> > I know that everyone has their own issues and working on
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 11:22 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an ATI Mobility Radeon X300 based laptop (x86) and tried to
> boot the boot.iso by using livecd-iso-to-disk but the installer could
> not see the image (CD/DVD not present, other options NFS, local disk -
> not including the
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
>> status is unclear:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> A follow up to this: a b
On 08/16/2010 09:05 AM, test-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Message: 10 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:36:18 -0700 From: Adam
> Williamson Subject: Re: Xorg.log To: For testers
> of Fedora development releases
> Message-ID: <1281972978.2294.1.ca...@adam.local.net> Content-Type:
> text/
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:02:38PM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>
> A half dozen Xorg log files were created in the same
> minute.
That happens if you are hit by "cascading failures". X crashes,
there is an attempt to restart it on another display, X crashes
again and da capo al fi
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 21:02 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Here is the Xorg log of F14 RC4 sans xorg.conf
> attempting to run the X server on a Radeon HD 5670.
>
> A half dozen Xorg log files were created in the same
> minute. They appear similar except for timestamp.
> The highest
Compose started at Mon Aug 16 13:15:18 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
LuxRender-0
#118: OpenSCAP test day proposal
---+
Reporter: pvrabec | Owner: kparal
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Day | Version:
#118: OpenSCAP test day proposal
---+
Reporter: pvrabec | Owner: kparal
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Day | Version:
On 08/16/2010 08:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
>> status is unclear:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> A follow up to this: a boot.iso w
#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts
to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe
Type: defect| Status: reopened
I have yet to file a bug report, although I intend to, but briefly F14 RC4
install fails on Fdisk error involving Python. I will RE: with bug report as
soon as I finish composing relevant data. Since the problem appears to be
software (python) related and not hardware, I think this would be a
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2010-08-16
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings,
No sense in breaking the trend ... let's continue the theme of F14Alpha
today. That includes Alpha test results [2] and status on remaini
#118: OpenSCAP test day proposal
---+
Reporter: pvrabec | Owner: kparal
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Day | Version:
#118: OpenSCAP test day proposal
---+
Reporter: pvrabec | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day | Version:
Resolution:
Compose started at Mon Aug 16 08:15:07 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req
Hi,
did somebody try to print a file with *gimp* in F14? If I try that, only
an empty page is printed, and if I try a print preview, only an empty
page is presented.
Similar experiences in F14?
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Hi,
I have a network printer (*Lexmark e120n*), attached via LAN to my box
(URL: "dnssd://Lexmark%20E120n._printer._tcp.local/")
It has been attached by "System->Administration->Printing).
I have some GIF files, and I open them by *eog* (via nautilus). Then
saying print (^P), the print is accept
#118: OpenSCAP test day proposal
--+-
Reporter: pvrabec | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
> > status is unclear:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> A follow up to th
33 matches
Mail list logo
