Well, Madrake certainly is easy to install... You just sit there watching
it auto-configure everything, and hope that it works.
So what happens when it doesn't? Do I dare venture my newbie ass into
"expert" install? I guess I'll have to.
Here's the deal:
I picked up the Mandrake 7.2 retail box
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:42:30PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Recently discovered tagging 'good' versions so I can try things out, although
> > most people considering branches my private work a tiny bit obsessive.
>
> Why should you treat your private work with any less respect than
> y
Mary Gardiner wrote:
> 2) I don't share my private work with others much, so I don't need to revision
> track so carefully.
Nah.. but CVS acts as a bloody useful backup as well. :)
Jenn V.
--
"Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture
you miss out on by
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:02:16PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mary Gardiner wrote:
>
>
> > 2) I don't share my private work with others much, so I don't need to revision
> > track so carefully.
>
> Nah.. but CVS acts as a bloody useful backup as well. :)
Yeah.
btw can anyone give me a
Excerpts from linuxchix: 30-Apr-101 Re: [techtalk] Re: Write do.. by
Mary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X outside project (say an open source project) has a cvs tree. I
> want to be able to import their CVS tree, whilst at the same time
> maintaining my own tree, probably minor, of changes, and resyncing
>
XFree86-4 has a new configuration script, Xconfigurator
Try running that.
Which package of Mandrake did you get? I stumbled across a "Desktop"
version and absolutely hated it; I installed a full version of mdk 8 a
week later. If you got the desktop version, it probably wants to go into
X when
Title: RE: [techtalk] Mandrake install problems
Avery,
http://www.wam.umd.edu/~zben/Linux/fuji200.html
HTH,
Davida
-Original Message-
From: A Kozic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [techtalk] Mandrake install proble
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Mandi wrote:
> XFree86-4 has a new configuration script, Xconfigurator
>
> Try running that.
Damn. I should have know that. I used that with Red Hat. That runs, but I
can't seem to give it a configuration that works. I still get the black
screen.
> Which package of Mandra
I hope you guys don't get sick of my questions...
I have run into a wierd problem - on this box, I'm running debian woody. All
of a sudden (no, it probably went along with an apt-get update, apt-get
upgrade) sendmail is unable to read or rebuild the aliases database. I get
the following error
I'm interested in learning more about the BSDs - I wondered if anyone had an
opinion about what the best of the BSDs is, in terms of hardware and software
compatibility and security. I am beginning to explore Darwin (the BSD behind
Mac OS X) since I have just installed OS X on a laptop. But I
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Michelle Murrain wrote:
> I hope you guys don't get sick of my questions...
Hey, that's what the list's for!
> I have run into a wierd problem - on this box, I'm running debian woody. All
> of a sudden (no, it probably went along with an apt-get update, apt-get
> upgrade) s
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:13:15PM -0400, Michelle Murrain wrote:
> So, I'm stuck. I can't rebuild the database, or even open it. I'm not sure
> exactly what broke it - a new version of something in woody?
>
> Any solutions? Workarounds, etc.? I've only got about 2 days before mail
> starts to
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:18:50PM -0400, Michelle Murrain wrote:
> I'm interested in learning more about the BSDs - I wondered if anyone had an
> opinion about what the best of the BSDs is, in terms of hardware and software
> compatibility and security. I am beginning to explore Darwin (the BSD
On Monday 30 April 2001 02:28 pm, James Sutherland wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Michelle Murrain wrote:
> > I hope you guys don't get sick of my questions...
>
> Hey, that's what the list's for!
>
> > I have run into a wierd problem - on this box, I'm running debian woody.
> > All of a sudden (no
How secure actually is Microsoft FP
Extensions? I had my co-admin install it on the server so it is easier for
him or others to update via Frontpage 2000, but I'm worried about the security
ramifications. I mean, I don't want to end up on attrition.org with a
picture of someones grandma r
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Michelle Murrain wrote:
> Wish it were simply a permissions issue. All of the files in /etc/mail are
> there, and thier permissions haven't changed (they are all owned by root, and
> chmod 744)
>
> It's a much wierder problem. I think that it has to do with somehow, the
> sys
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:10:42AM -0400, Laurel Fan wrote:
> Excerpts from linuxchix: 30-Apr-101 Re: [techtalk] Re: Write do.. by
> Mary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X outside project (say an open source project) has a cvs tree. I
> > want to be able to import their CVS tree, whilst at the same time
>
Mary Gardiner wrote:
> btw can anyone give me a run down on this situation:
>
> X outside project (say an open source project) has a cvs tree. I want to be able
> to import their CVS tree, whilst at the same time maintaining my own tree, probably
> minor, of changes, and resyncing every so ofte
Very
insecure. Just go look at any security site and do a search for FrontPage
Extensions. I won't let them on any server that I expose to the outside
world.
Jason
-Original Message-From: Kath
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:05
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Kriselda Jarnsaxa wrote:
> I'm
> not familiar with the Mandrake 7.2 configuration/setup sequence, but it
> sounds a LOT like the "Recommended" mode on Mandrake 8. I've found that
> using the "Expert" setting gives me a LOT more control, and it still offers
> warnings if you'r
20 matches
Mail list logo
