Jason wrote:
The new builds of Mozilla are getting very good. I've switched to it as my
standard browser now. Check out a new nightly build. It also has a full
featured IMAP mail client.
I have it installed for pages that need it, but it really eats a lot of memory. I use
lavaps and
Thanks for all the suggestions about replacing Netscape. I do have a
POP3 account, so kmail works fine for me. The problem is that if you
want to quickly check out a web page referenced in a message, kfm will
automatically open and it doesn't do good downloads (I'm not sure it can
even do *any*,
malke wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the suggestions about replacing Netscape. I do have a
> POP3 account, so kmail works fine for me. The problem is that if you
> want to quickly check out a web page referenced in a message, kfm will
> automatically open and it doesn't do good downloads (I'm not su
Is there a reasonable limit to the amount of virtual hosts one should
run on a server? For example, we're up to 5 virtual hosts on one web
server (using Apache) and are considering adding another. One opinion
has been voiced that the more you add, the easier it is for things to
break. My boss als
Slightly off topic, but I need to store thousands of DLT computer
tapes which weigh about a pound each and are roughly 4.5" x 4.5" x
1.25". Has anyone else solved this problem or can anyone recommend a
vendor who builds custom storage boxes?
Thanks for your suggestions!
judith bush
the inter
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:59:29PM -0500, Yvonne Beever wrote:
> Is there a reasonable limit to the amount of virtual hosts one should
> run on a server? For example, we're up to 5 virtual hosts on one web
> server (using Apache) and are considering adding another. One opinion
> has been voiced t
Le 05 octobre 2000 a 13:59, Yvonne Beever a écrit :
> Is there a reasonable limit to the amount of virtual hosts one should
> run on a server? For example, we're up to 5 virtual hosts on one web
> server (using Apache) and are considering adding another. One opinion
> has been voiced that the mor
> Depends what 'slow' you mean. We have just graduated from a 28.8k modem
> to cablemodem (woo!). So everything on the net seems incredibly fast now!
> (Except sourceforge, but that's now usable rather than impossible.)
> It now takes me a few minutes to download a nightly mozilla instead of
>
In response to Erin's comment...another thing you can think about is this:
If you use the Include directive...you can set up a seperate file for each
virtual hosts. That is the way we do it where I work...we have many virtual
hosts. But they each have their seperate config file...then we includ
