Re: [techtalk] KDE / OpenSource

2000-08-04 Thread Sharon Souter
- Original Message - From: Caitlyn M. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dan Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 7:41 PM Subject: Re: [techtalk] KDE / OpenSource > That doesn't work in the business world, unfortunately. People would > probably le

[techtalk] BASH command return value

2000-08-04 Thread Subba Rao
My PS1 prompt has the following string, PS1='($?)\u@\h:\w =>' In this case, when my command fails the BASH variable $? value is displayed in my prompt. What is happening is that a command return value stays there until an new command is issued. A newline for the shell will still return the prev

Re: [techtalk] BASH command return value

2000-08-04 Thread Mandi
when you change \u to `whoami`, you get the 0 value because you are executing `whoami` everytime you get a prompt, i think. `whoami` has an exit code of 0, successful, so that's what goes into $?. \u, \h, \w, \W, etc aren't executed, they're properties of the shell at that time. that's the way

[techtalk] Newbie

2000-08-04 Thread emeron
Hello Everyone, I'd like to introduce myself. My name is Janice Bub and I live in Ontario :) A co-worker of mine (we work at an ISP), Melanie Burrett told me about this cool Linux site for girls. I'm very new to Linux and I'm teaching myself RedHat 6.0. I look forward to reading the discus

Re: [techtalk] BASH command return value

2000-08-04 Thread Dan Nguyen
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 11:34:07AM -0400, Subba Rao wrote: > > PS1='($?)\u@\h:\w =>' > PS1='($?)`whoami`@\h:\w =>' > In BASH, why does the "\u" and "whoami" make a big difference for > the $? value in PS1 string? The BASH version is 2.04. My assumption is that using whoami with the ` ` causes it

Re: [techtalk] Newbie

2000-08-04 Thread wirren
Woohoo Janice(:! Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Hello Everyone, > > I'd like to introduce myself. My name is Janice Bub and I live in Ontario > :) > A co-worker of mine (we work at an ISP), Melanie Burrett told me about this > > cool Linux site for girls. I'm very new to Linux and I'm teaching

[techtalk] problems upgrading to gnome 1.2 and enlightenment 0.16.4

2000-08-04 Thread colin parr
Hey all Hope somebody can help - I'm having a complete nightmare trying to upgrade to the above over a standard RH6.1 install (completely fresh - I thought I'd start over...) on a PIII 500MHz, 64MB, RIVA 32MB TNT2 dual boot w W98. The RH6.1 goes fine - everything working as you'd expect. I th

Re: [techtalk] BASH command return value

2000-08-04 Thread joey tsai
> My PS1 prompt has the following string, > > PS1='($?)\u@\h:\w =>' > > In this case, when my command fails the BASH variable $? value is displayed > in my prompt. What is happening is that a command return value stays there > until an new command is issued. > > When I change the PS1 sring to,