Hi,
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Jeff Frasca wrote:
> Just to pick a nit, class A, B, and C address are all valid, however,
> you are probably thinking of the reserved ranges within those classes.
>
> Class A IP Addresses run from 0.0.0.0-127.255.255.255
I think class A is merely the range 1.x.x.x - 1
I don't know much about this kind of stuff, but
if you still have email access where you work,
can't you use that to access the web? Or do
the security measures or whatever prevent that too?
There's a web page at
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/internet-services/access-via-email/
explaining how to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Anne Forker wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Jeff Frasca wrote:
>
> > Just to pick a nit, class A, B, and C address are all valid, however,
> > you are probably thinking of the reserved ranges within those classes.
> >
> > Class A
Sounds like they are just using the proxy and not the firewall to restrict
access to the web if you have some access to the web and you could surf
before the proxy server was installed. I could be wrong though. You said
you were using
Microsoft. That's easy. Just go to tools (depending on whic
Hello all,
I've been testing the above 3 distros, and with every single one getting
dial-up networking to work is a serious hassle. KPPP does not do the job,
nor does the RH PPP dialer. For every one I have to dig into the guts of
the system (hurrah for "Running Linux"!).
In RH 6.1 I ha
Hi Carla,
To be honest, I have been using RH6.0 through 6.2 and have no problems
with ppp. I used the netcfg utility to set up the interface and ensure
that iwas configured to come up at boot time. When I belonged to
sprint, they would allow unlimited internet access in 5 hour
increments. Once
At 05:48 PM 6/18/00 -0700, Carla wrote:
> As I have finally gotten connected with all 3, I was wondering if anyone
>has some insights to offer. Is there a common procedure I am missing? Has
>anyone gotten setup successfully just using KPPP or RH PPP dialer? Is it an
>ISP thing?
I had a t
Someone please tell me there exists an explanation of file and directory
permissions that will make them make sense! I keep thinking that I understand
them, but then I find myself in a tangle that I am sure is caused by improper
permissions. (I am still -- after three months or so -- trying to
Yes, Yes, there is =) :
First, there are lots of neato tricks that people like us like to use to
impress people such as 'chmod ug+rwx file' (which gives yourself and your
group read, right, and execute access to 'file') but I'll try and give you
some of the basics. btw, I'm not really one of thos
