On 0, srl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I've done so far:
>
> -configured fetchmail (I think) properly to check the POP3 box, but it
> won't connect. It's supposed to be logging into maple.he.net as
> localjoe.org/srl. Here's what I get in my /var/log/maillog:
>
> Apr 15 14:40:33 trinity
I'm using Mandrake 7 (kernel 2.2.14-mdk). Do I need to recompile for ipmasq
to work?
Thanks,
Kathy
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
___
tech
I tried that, but the system won't let me change the priority; this is a
service running as LocalSystem, and I think it's locking me out, even as
Administrator.
srl
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, aprilk wrote:
> I play sysadmin at home but learning NT, fortunately it isn't used as
> the main OS here. Y
I installed Redhat Linux 6.1 last night but am having a dickens of a time
getting my mouse to work with X. I had been using a really, really old
version of Linux so I reformatted the drive and started a clean install. I'm
using a Microsoft Intellimouse (the optical version) connected to the PS/2
M
After much frigging about with my system, and I mean ***a very very
large amount of frigging*** I still cannot get sound working on this
machine.
The crux of it seems to be that sound is all there, but I just can't
tell the modconf program what the parameters are to make it sodding well
work.
Sarah-
About a month ago I was like you, pulling my hair out trying to get a
SB-64AWE card to work. This is how I did it.
You should have made the modules in the kernel for sound support
(sound.o), sb compatible support (sb.o) and a low-level AWE driver
(awe_wave.o).
If you have an ISA card yo
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Sarah Hollings wrote:
> After much frigging about with my system, and I mean ***a very very
> large amount of frigging*** I still cannot get sound working on this
> machine.
>
> The crux of it seems to be that sound is all there, but I just can't
> tell the modconf prog
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Lothan wrote:
> I installed Redhat Linux 6.1 last night but am having a dickens of a time
> getting my mouse to work with X. I had been using a really, really old
> version of Linux so I reformatted the drive and started a clean install. I'm
> using a Microsoft Intellimo
Hi all. Long story short, I have decided to install Linux (Mandrake 6.0) on
a second hard drive, rather than partitioning my current 15GB hard drive
devoted to Windows 98. The second hard drive is 10.1 GB and boots to DOS
only right now. It's not even installed on my machine yet.
Obviously, I
Hi,
Sounds to me like your firewall isn't letting the remote POP server
through. Check your logs, if your logging denys you should see it
denying the remote mail server. Let it through on the POP port and
you should not see this error.
Hope it helps.
Nicci
srl wrote:
Okay, I've been kicking at
On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 09:35:50AM -0700, Lothan wrote:
> I'm using a Microsoft Intellimouse (the optical version) connected
> to the PS/2 Mouse port. When I run startx, the mouse pointer sits in
> the top right corner of the screen and won't budge. Moving the mouse
> just causes it to pop up some
I finally figured out the problem with the mouse. For some reason the
Redhat installation utility installed the mouse as PS/2 even though I
had specified Intellimouse. I ran mouseconfig (after a long search
through the web...) and it configured the mouse as IMPS/2. While I was
at it, I ran XConfig
The Russells wrote:
> Hi all. Long story short, I have decided to install Linux (Mandrake 6.0) on
> a second hard drive, rather than partitioning my current 15GB hard drive
> devoted to Windows 98. The second hard drive is 10.1 GB and boots to DOS
> only right now. It's not even installed on m
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Sarah Hollings wrote:
>
> > After much frigging about with my system, and I mean ***a very very
> > large amount of frigging*** I still cannot get sound working on this
> > machine.
> >
> > The crux of it seems to be th
Hi,
I am having some trouble setting up remote root access on a backup
system. In Solaris, to setup remote root access in a secure environment, I
would put a .rhosts file in the root dir, and just use the rsh/rcp/rlogin
commands to access the system without providing a root password (I would
The CD-Rom is the secondary slave because of where it is on the cable. You want your
new hard drive to be the primary slave in the system. You do not want to move you
CD-Rom to the Primary slave position. The position it is currently in is actually the
best for future upgrades and additions o
The Cat In The Hat wrote:
>
> The CD-Rom is the secondary slave because of where it is on the cable. You want
>your new hard drive to be the primary slave in the system. You do not want to move
>you CD-Rom to the Primary slave position. The position it is currently in is
>actually the best f
root wrote:
>
> A lot has changed from
> my 1995 version of Linux (command line only) so now I get to dip my toes
> into the new waters... Anybody have a life preserver I can borrow? :-)
This whole list is a life preserver. :)
Tip: don't do your work as root. Create a login, even if it's just
Pete Durst wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having some trouble setting up remote root access on a backup
> system. In Solaris, to setup remote root access in a secure environment, I
> would put a .rhosts file in the root dir, and just use the rsh/rcp/rlogin
> commands to access the system without provi
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The Cat In The Hat wrote:
>>
>> The CD-Rom is the secondary slave because of where it is on the cable. You want
>your new hard drive to be the primary slave in the system. You do not want to move
>you CD-Rom to the Primary slave position. The pos
>
> I was unaware of any performance differences based on location, but
> someone in the thread mentioned that HD slaves of ATAPI devices can
> suffer. (or 'pears' where an ATAPI is the 'banana'. Hm. Maybe the terms
> aren't quite that arbitrary.)
>
> Jenn V.
Supposedly an IDE controller will d
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, The Russells wrote:
>Anyway. Currently, according to BIOS, my primary master is my 15GB HD. I
>don't have a primary slave or a secondary master. My secondary slave is my
>CD-ROM. This seems strange to me, as I don't have a secondary master.
>However, I am a Mac user at h
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 8:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [techtalk] Mouse Problems
>
>
> root wrote:
> >
> > A lot has changed from
> > my 1995 version of Linux (command line only) so now I g
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:34:28 -0400, "Wendt,Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>With IDE devices, only one of the master/slave can talk to your
>computer at a time, on each channel. But your computer is able to
>talk to a device on the primary channel at the same time as it talks
>to a device on th
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darren
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 9:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [techtalk] Installing Linux on a second hard drive.
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >The Cat In The Hat wrote:
> >>
> >> Th
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
>There are also issues with putting devices that can handle both 16-bit
>and 32-bit transfers on the same channel as devices that only handle
>16-bit transfers; my understanding is that 16-bit-only devices may
>become confused by 32-bit transfers to
26 matches
Mail list logo
