"Wendt,Andrew" wrote:
>
> Eek. I cannot understand why people have black letters on a light background
> for viewing text...
> What do you people prefer as colours for extended viewing of text? :-)
Black on white, always. White on black is literally painful!
For me.
Jenn V.
--
"We're rep
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 08:26:06PM +1100 or thereabouts, Jenn V. wrote:
> > What do you people prefer as colours for extended viewing of text? :-)
>
> Black on white, always. White on black is literally painful!
> For me.
I remember when I started using X finding that the combinations of
colou
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Wendt,Andrew wrote:
> [...]
> >6. Get a color scheme that works for you, and stick with it. I like
> >black text on a light yellowy background for major reading of computer
> >text, purply or blue-green title bars, matching widgets, light yellowish
> >text in the titlebars, m
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Wendt,Andrew wrote:
> What do you people prefer as colours for extended viewing of text? :-)
On my old monitor I preferred white text/black background - on this one I find
that anything except white background is okay - even light yellow.
Sunnan (mm, how can I change away the
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Sunnanvind wrote:
> CRT screens are *never* 21" of usable screen.
Objections :-). I once read a test of a CAD workstation (PC hardware)
which had a monitor with an 28" tube which might give some 26" or 27"
usable screen. That thing almost looked like one of those TVs of the
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Jenn V. wrote:
> So I suspect it's a function of the end-user's mail. Do this experiment
> with the various lists you're on - see what you get when you hit
> reply/replyall.
I'd love to, but this version of Pine doesn't _have_ replyall. It prompts
you when you hit reply; if
>> What do you people prefer as colours for extended viewing of text? :-)
If I'm reading a README while installing, it'll probably be less in an Eterm with
randomised
picture bgs - sometimes hard to read, but I love the pics!!!
Else, it might be black on white in emacs or netscape (for html) -
Telsa Gwynne wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 12:13:34PM -0500 or thereabouts, Subba Rao wrote:
> > On 0, Nils Philippsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I wouldn't use the "original" PGP as it has a pretty dumb license and this
> > > backdoor crap. I use the GNU Privacy Guard (www.gnupg.
trueand the resolutions on those screens are comparable to the
resolution on a TVpretty sucky, not adaquate for AutoCAD at all.
-
Objections :-). I once read a test of a CAD workstation (PC hardware)
which had a monitor with an
On Jan 14, Wendt,Andrew conjectured:
> What do you people prefer as colours for extended viewing of text? :-)
I personally like white letters on black background. And word processing
apps are always black letters on white bg. This is why I prefer to use
paper copy for extended reading. I can'
On Jan 14, V Clarke conjectured:
> I'd love to, but this version of Pine doesn't _have_ replyall. It prompts
> you when you hit reply; if you choose the replyall option, it replies to
> the sender with a CC to the mailing list; if not you only get the sender.
> It also prompts for reply-to header
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, J B wrote:
> trueand the resolutions on those screens are comparable to the
> resolution on a TVpretty sucky, not adaquate for AutoCAD at all.
I'm pretty sure that the thing I described was capable of doing CAD,
otherwise why would it be a CAD workstation? I think t
You can also use roles (depending on version of pine... if it is below
4.0 probably not). Roles will recognise a line in a header and form a
pre determined (by you) header
to base the response on.
I guess I don't see the point in manually editing it too many times...
kind of like code. If you ca
At 1:06 PM -0800 1/14/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello All,
>If anyone recieves this please let me know. I seem to
>have seriously goofed up my sendmail. I have not been
>able to post for weeks. Everything gets denied on my
>end.
Came through fine here, Harry!
[copied directly to him as well.
> > Britta.. I'd love to have this link.. but, this
> > one didn't work.. Would you mind sending it again?
>
> That link did work for me. However, the url at the site is
> http://faqfinder.ics.uci.edu:8001/ .
>
> =
> Glen Strom
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks G.. I found that Netscape in win
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nils Philippsen
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 9:14 AM
> To: J B
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [techtalk] Monitor Size
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, J B wrote:
>
> > trueand the resolut
Test
Harry Hoffman
Product Systems Specialist
Restaurants Unlimited Inc.
(206) 634-3082 x. 270
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Hello All,
If anyone recieves this please let me know. I seem to
have seriously goofed up my sendmail. I have not been
able to post for weeks. Everything gets denied on my
end.
Thanks,
Harry Hoffman
Product Systems Specialist
Restaurants Unlimited Inc.
(206) 634-3082 x. 270
[EMAI
18 matches
Mail list logo
