all I can say is ... keeps notes during your installation .. know where your
libs are going ..
other then that .. it should go fine
Henti
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Mehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 9:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [
> KDE is released under the GPL, but Qt is not. You can't use KDE
> without Qt. (It's questionable in my mind whether a GPL product
> should rely on a third-party library which is not released under
> the GPL, the LGPL, or an equivalently open license)
I can't disagree with the latter statement
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 09:09:01AM -0400, Caitlyn Martin wrote:
> > KDE is released under the GPL, but Qt is not. You can't use KDE
> > without Qt. (It's questionable in my mind whether a GPL product
> > should rely on a third-party library which is not released under
> > the GPL, the LGPL, or a
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 12:38:06AM -0400, Laurel Fan wrote:
> All ftpds suck. The only one that doesn't have more holes than a
> fishing net is the openbsd ftpd (it's debians default ftpd. don't know
> where to get it for other distros..).
would that be proftpd? I seem to recall that being the
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999 09:09:01 -0400, "Caitlyn Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I can't disagree with the latter statement, but it no longer applies
>to KDE. When TrollTech changed the license, it met the Open Source
>definition, at least sufficiently to satisy, form what I've read,
>Eric Raymon
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999 01:04:15 -0400 (EDT), Laurel Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Gnome and KDE will never merge because it would be very very hard and
>nobody would ever do it (unless you're volunteering here..). Harder
>than implementing every Gnome feature from scratch in KDE or vice
>versa. Gt
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999 08:56:53 -0500, Aaron Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>As a side note, someone (I think kelly) described Qt as a 'dog'. I'm
>curious about this... my experiences with Qt have been great -- much
>easier to write in than Gtk+. I'm hardly an experienced X
>programmer, though.
> I am, to be quite blunt, more qualified to render an opinion on the
> compatibility of two licenses than ESR is. Frankly, I think ESR is a
> loon. ESR's imprimateur means virtually nothing to me; I am going on
> my personal evaluation of the licenses as I understand them.
I don't know about
TrueI figured I'd do it the old fashioned way, just load it up and
see what breaks. I figured it would make a good write up to post here
once I got it to work. I'm just glad I was able to talk the client into
letting me use a free OS vs. Solaris or WinNT.
Wayne
--- Henti Smith <[EMAIL PROTE
Greetings,
My wife (guess who!) seems to enjoy this list a lot so I thought I'd join
up (I seem to be doing this frequently). I'm Karl (aka Andross/TeknoDragon
depending on the medium of participation) a CS undergrad at WSU and a
"technopagan".
Right now I'm trying to squeeze MacOS down into 102
Which version are you trying to run? I think I still have my 7.1
floppies somewhere :)
Wayne
--- TeknoDragon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right now I'm trying to squeeze MacOS down into 1024k or so so that I
> can
> install m68k on a 4MB SE/30. I think i'm close, but every combination
> of
>
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Wayne Mehl wrote:
> Which version are you trying to run? I think I still have my 7.1
> floppies somewhere :)
7.0.1, as i'm typing linux is booting (frozen i think, infact... most
deffinately) I got MacOS down to 1072-1074k which is just barely enough
with the 1.4k ramdisk im
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, TeknoDragon wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My wife (guess who!) seems to enjoy this list a lot so I thought I'd join
> up (I seem to be doing this frequently). I'm Karl (aka Andross/TeknoDragon
> depending on the medium of participation) a CS undergrad at WSU and a
> "technopagan".
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Serena Del Bianco wrote:
> that wont work if you're using threads either
> imagine that thread 1 tries to execute that code and x is 0
> it will execute (*x == 0) and it will see the expression is true and will
> execute x++ then, thread 1 is preempted and thread 2 starts exe
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, TeknoDragon wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Serena Del Bianco wrote:
>
> yes, I understand SMP programming concepts...
>
> as I said, I was assuming I could garuntee testset was an *atomic*
> function... i.e. indivisible and possibly smaller than the timeslice of a
> schedul
> as I said, I was assuming I could garuntee testset was an *atomic*
> function... i.e. indivisible and possibly smaller than the timeslice
> of a scheduler... like a few i/o functions...
Speed doesn't guarantee anything. A timer interrupt can reschedule you
anytime, anywhere. Also, reschedule
This is something I'm interested in... I personally use emacs in console but
I'd like to have a graphical interface for X. =} I'm using Xemacs right
now with the cc-mode packages and java stuff but I'd like to try others.
What are everyone else's recommendations?
> What an awesome environme
17 matches
Mail list logo
