On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:53:33 -0400 (EDT)
"Jennifer M. Woodard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there called glare screens. A good one runs about 60 bucks. One of my best
> investments, Its really good for those that work in cubicle hell and have
> to deal with florecents. (however thats spelled) M
Amanda Owens wrote:
>
> However, I'm sure the rest of the mailing list would be interested to
> hear if the flat screen helped at all. Not to mention how pretty it
> looks. If only so we can all drool with envy, then try to get our doctors to
> write prescriptions for them so we can write them of
there called glare screens. A good one runs about 60 bucks. One of my best
investments, Its really good for those that work in cubicle hell and have
to deal with florecents. (however thats spelled) My headaches have been
cut in half from it. :)
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Dakota Surmonde wrote:
> On
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Shall I let you know if it makes a difference? I know anecdotal stuff
> 'in the wild' isn't research, but it can trigger research. :)
>
It'd be interesting, but I actually work in the cancer research field.
We're working with ultrasound to elev
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Dakota Surmonde wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > So, since I spend hours/day at the computer.. we're looking into
> > getting me a flatscreen monitor. In case that's it.
>
> When I was pregnant, mindy (son's amom) got a screenish thingie that went
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, since I spend hours/day at the computer.. we're looking into
> getting me a flatscreen monitor. In case that's it.
When I was pregnant, mindy (son's amom) got a screenish thingie that went
over the monitor and supposedly cut out all the nasty st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Amanda Owens wrote:
>
> > Now, there *are* folks who are always more sensitive to such things as
> > others (or else Jenn wouldn't have brought the subject up in the first
> > place). Minimizing exposure (like one might not stand *right* next your
> > microwave while
Amanda Owens wrote:
> Now, there *are* folks who are always more sensitive to such things as
> others (or else Jenn wouldn't have brought the subject up in the first
> place). Minimizing exposure (like one might not stand *right* next your
> microwave while it's on, or the nurse hiding behind an
I doubt there's much 'neutral' literature out there - most people who
research this sort of thing are going to have an agenda on one side of
the arguement or the other, and both sides can take the same data and
argue whatever they want to be 'the truth' with it. Unfortunately.
Personally, I'm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2. Anyone know what issues there are with flatscreens & linux support?
If the flatscreen comes with its own graphics card, it'll only work on one of the
following conditions:
a) There is a linux compatible driver (XFree86, etc) for it
b) It emulates another graphics ca
Amanda Owens wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Discussion on issues brings up a question.
> >
> > We're looking into a flatscreen monitor for our next monitor purchase - for
> > a number of reasons, one of which is that my doctor thinks long exposure to
> > EMR may be
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Discussion on issues brings up a question.
>
> We're looking into a flatscreen monitor for our next monitor purchase - for
> a number of reasons, one of which is that my doctor thinks long exposure to
> EMR may be keeping me unwell. So.
>
> 1. Any
12 matches
Mail list logo
