MAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [techtalk] problems upgrading to gnome 1.2 and enlightenment
>0.16.4
>Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 08:21:43 +1000
>
>On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 07:31:44AM -0700, colin parr wrote:
> > Right on both counts! I was doing the in
Hi, Malcolm and everyone else,
>
> Oh dear! I would have thought (hoped?) it was harder to mess up the rpm
> database using gnorpm than using the command line. I didn't even think of
> mentioning it in my previous post because I tend to always use the command
> line for installing stuff, but had I
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 07:31:44AM -0700, colin parr wrote:
> Right on both counts! I was doing the install thru gnorpm and was messing
> it up royally, the dot files bit was needed too.
Oh dear! I would have thought (hoped?) it was harder to mess up the rpm database
using gnorpm than using the
edinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [techtalk] problems upgrading to gnome 1.2 and enlightenment
>0.16.4
>Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 20:39:48 +1000
>
>
>When you say you "applied" the RPMs, what do you mean exactly? Did you
>do 'rp
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:43:06PM -0700, colin parr wrote:
> Hope somebody can help - I'm having a complete nightmare trying to upgrade
> to the above over a standard RH6.1 install (completely fresh - I thought I'd
> start over...) on a PIII 500MHz, 64MB, RIVA 32MB TNT2 dual boot w W98.
Don't
Hey all
Hope somebody can help - I'm having a complete nightmare trying to upgrade
to the above over a standard RH6.1 install (completely fresh - I thought I'd
start over...) on a PIII 500MHz, 64MB, RIVA 32MB TNT2 dual boot w W98.
The RH6.1 goes fine - everything working as you'd expect. I th
